排序方式: 共有3条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
社会捐赠已经是当前高等学校教育经费的重要来源。通过对农业院校社会捐赠发展现状进行分析,发现农业院校存在社会捐赠工作相对落后,地区分布有明显的"马太效应",资金管理不规范等问题。但目前社会氛围、国家政策等都对农业院校有倾斜,政府层面要鼓励社会捐赠,规范监管行为,农业院校要重视校友资源培育与挖掘,明确筹资目标。 相似文献
2.
Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Using Reticulocyte Indices in Dogs Enrolled in a Blood Donor Program 下载免费PDF全文
D.S. Foy K.R. Friedrichs J.F. Bach 《Journal of veterinary internal medicine / American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine》2015,29(5):1376-1380
Background
People donating blood more than twice annually are at risk of developing iron deficiency. Little is known about the iron status of dogs enrolled in blood donor programs.Hypothesis
Dogs donating blood ≥6 times annually will show evidence of iron deficiency based on their reticulocyte indices.Animals
Thirteen dogs enrolled in a blood donor program donating ≥6 times over the preceding 12 months and 20 healthy nondonor control dogs.Methods
Prospective observational study. Mature red blood cell (RBC) indices, reticulocyte indices, serum iron, serum ferritin, and total iron‐binding capacity (TIBC) were compared between groups.Results
Packed cell volume (median 47%, range 40–52%, P < .01), hematocrit (median 46.4%, range 40.3–52.5%, P < .01), and reticulocyte count (median 16,000/μL, range 9,000–38,000/μL, P < .01) were significantly lower in the blood donor dogs. No statistically significant differences were noted in the mature RBC indices between groups. Both reticulocyte mean corpuscular volume (median 88.8 fL, range 83.4–95.5 fL, P = .03) and reticulocyte hemoglobin content (median 24.6 pg, range 23.1–26.6 pg, P < .01) were significantly lower in the blood donor group. Serum iron and ferritin were similar between groups; however, TIBC was significantly higher in the control group (median 403 μg/dL, range 225–493 μg/dL, P = .02).Conclusions
The findings in dogs donating ≥6 times annually suggest the presence of iron‐deficient erythropoiesis in this population. 相似文献3.
张珊珊 《安徽农业大学学报》2009,(1):1-3
在 5.12 地震发生之后的捐款活动中,一些跨国企业因为反应迟缓饱受舆论诟病;同时,很多中国企业在捐款中的行动受到公众的高度赞扬。对此现象,可以从中西慈善文化差异和中西企业慈善文化及机制的差异分析其深层原因。由于西方慈善文化的影响以及自身公司严格的捐赠运行机制,跨国企业的捐赠相对迟缓,而基于中国慈善文化的影响,中国公众对跨国公司的行为无法接受,因而掀起了舆论狂澜。这次事件应促使跨国公司和中国企业及中国公众思考应如何在全球化的浪潮中更好地应对文化差异。 相似文献
1