Poind Soil pH Measurement

Soil pH often is measured in samples from the bottoms of aquaculture ponds. Several different techniques for soil pH are used. This study considered the differences in pH obtained by the different methods and determined which methods appeared most useful. Dual electrodes (indicating and reference) and a single‐probe combination electrode gave similar pH values when inserted into 1:1 mixtures of dry soil and distilled water. There were slight differences in pH between readings with dual and combination electrodes when the dual electrodes were arranged with the indicating electrode in the sediment phase and the reference electrode in the supernatant phase of the mixture. The two‐phase method with the dual electrode does not appear warranted because of greater difficulty in making measurements. Dry soil: distilled water ratios of 1:2.5, 1:5, and 1:10 had progressively greater pH readings than obtained at a 1:1 ratio. Measurements made in 0.01 M CaCl₂ and 1.0 M KCl had much different values than those made in distilled water. Higher pH resulted when pH was measured without stirring or in filtrates of soil‐water mixtures. A 20‐min period of intermittent stirring before making measurements was necessary for a stable pH value. Particle size did not influence pH in aliquots passing 0.053 to 2.36‐mm sieves. Drying temperature had a strong influence on pH, and measurements made on samples dried at 40 to 60 C are probably most reliable. Measurements of in situ pH in wet soil with standard pH electrode or a portable acidity tester differed greatly from those made in 1:1 dry soil to distilled water mixtures. Pond bottom soil pH measurement should be standardized. Based on findings of this study, the following method is suggested: dry soil at 60 C in a forced‐draft oven; pulverize soil to pass a 2‐mm sieve; mix soil and distilled water in a 1:1 ratio (weight: volume); stir intermittently with glass rod for 30 min; insert dual electrodes or a combination electrode into the mixture; measure pH while stirring.     

Bottom soil quality in Tilapia ponds of different age in Thailand

Bottom soil samples were collected from 35 ponds in the vicinity of Samutprakarn, Thailand. Ponds ranged in age from 3 to 39 years and had been used continuously for production of tilapia. Liming materials had been applied in large amounts, and bottom soils of all ponds had pH above 7, low exchange acidity, and free carbonate. Pond soils often contained between 1% and 2% total sulphur, suggesting that they were potential acid–sulphate soils. However, acidity from sulphide oxidation was not expressed because carbonate in the soil neutralized it. Concentrations of total carbon seldom exceeded 4% and the average for organic carbon was 1.90%. The correlations between pond age and both total carbon and organic carbon concentration were weak (r=0.34 and 0.36 respectively). Concentrations of nitrogen in bottom soils did not differ with pond age and ranged from 0.1% to 0.3% with an average of 0.19%. The average ratio of concentrations of carbon and nitrogen was 11. Acid‐extractable phosphorus concentrations averaged 217 mg kg^?1, but the phosphorus adsorption capacity averaged 768 mg kg^?1 suggesting that soils still have considerable reserve capacity to adsorb phosphorus. Ponds can be used annually for semi‐intensive production of tilapia, and presumably other species, for many years without serious deterioration of bottom soil quality.     

Quality of liming materials used in aquaculture in Thailand

Samples of 45 brands of liming materials were obtained in Thailand and analyzed for chemical and physical properties. Eight of 10 products sold as ground calcium carbonate (calcitic agricultural limestone) were properly identified by vendors and of high quality, that is, neutralizing value and fineness rating above 85%. Seven of 15 products sold as ground dolomite (dolomitic agricultural limestone) were properly identified, seven were ordinary pulverized limestone instead of dolomite, and one was lime. The seven dolomitic agricultural limestone samples were of high quality, that is, fineness ratings above 85% and neutralizing values above 95%. Only two of eight misidentified samples were of high quality. Only one of four products sold as marl had neutralizing value and efficiency rating above 85%, but all were properly identified. Five products sold as crushed seashell had been burned and should have been identified as lime. However, neutralizing values (72–103%) were lower than those of good quality lime. All 13 samples sold as lime were properly identified, and eight were of good quality, that is, neutralizing value above 120% and fineness rating above 85%. The cost of liming materials ranged from US$ 0.01 to 0.20kg^–1 for marl and from US$ 0.10 to 0.14kg^–1 for lime. There was no relationship between product quality and cost. Fish and shrimp farmers in Thailand should insist that manufacturers and vendors of liming materials provide data on product composition.