Policy analysis of the ‘MPA‐process’ in temperate continental shelf areas

• 1. The decision to designate, implement and manage marine protected areas (MPAs) is often made ad hoc without clear guiding procedures. This study evaluates the process of establishment and management of MPAs in temperate soft‐bottom marine areas, including identification of objectives, site selection, designation, implementation, ecological effectiveness and socio‐economic impacts.
• 2. For the first time, literature about marine conservation strategies in soft‐bottom temperate areas is brought together in one ‘systems approach’, which is visualized in a flow chart including three phases: setting policy objectives, making decisions and evaluating the eventual effects of the MPA. Policy objectives are generally easy to identify and in most cases national policy objectives are driven by international and regional legal obligations. The decision making process is the most complex phase, as the acceptance of MPAs has to be balanced against the human activities that take place in the area.
• 3. The relation between fisheries and MPA‐management appears to be most challenging in soft‐bottom temperate marine areas because of conflicting interests and institutional differences. Activities limited in space and not relying directly on ecosystem functions (e.g. offshore energy production and aggregate extraction) are generally easier to manage than fisheries.
• 4. The conceptual mapping exercise presented here serves as a basis for a systems approach for MPAs and has been tested for the Belgian coastal environment. In the Belgian ‘MPA‐process’, the application of the systems approach proves to be useful in providing insight into the complex interactions of various authorities with scattered jurisdictions.
• 5. The unified and simplified representation of the various aspects is (1) a useful communication tool for policy makers and managers to inform other sectors and the public at large and (2) a valuable support during the ‘MPA‐process’ that considerably enhances the prospects for success.

Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Interactions between epibenthos and meiobenthos in a high intertidal Avicennia marina mangrove forest

Many studies in the muddy intertidal zone of temperate regions haveindicated meiofaunal communities to be mainly affected by epibenthicpredation and disturbance rather than competition. Few studies, however,have dealt with mangrove sediments of tropical areas. In addition to aparallel study in a Ceriops tagal (Perr.) Rob. zone, a manipulativeexclusion technique was used to trace the dominant biological interactionsstructuring the meiobenthos of an East African Avicennia marina (Forsk.)Vierh. mangrove forest.The densities of the major meiobenthic taxa and nematode genera and abroad range of environmental factors were monitored over a depth profile forone year of caging. Cages (1 m²) excluded all epibenthos (> 2 mm)for one year and were procedurally controlled. Procedural and exclusioneffects were traced, using a factorial and mixed ANOVA design. Significant exclusion effects were indicated for oligochaetes and for oneof the dominant epistratal feeding nematode genera. They are discussed interms of epibenthic composition and density, feeding behaviour, foodresources, and the abiotic environment. The conclusion is that the observed meiobenthos (especially oligochaetesand nematodes) is influenced mainly by exploitative or resource competitionwith the epibenthos. The common food source was indicated to be muddydetritus and microalgae. Consequently, the role of the meiobenthos is mainlysituated in an isolated, detrital food web with only minor energy fluxes tothe epibenthos.