排序方式: 共有9条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
以容量滴定法测定呋塞米原料药含量的验证过程为实例,具体阐述了容量滴定法的方法验证过程和验证结果的认可标准,以期为容量滴定法科学合理的验证与认可提供参考。 相似文献
2.
建立了双葛止泻口服液的微生物限度检查方法。根据2015年版《中华人民共和国兽药典(二部)》通则1102非无菌产品微生物限度检查:微生物计数法,以及通则1103非无菌产品微生物限度检查:控制菌检查法和通则1104非无菌兽药微生物限度标准进行方法适用性试验。结果表明,采用薄膜过滤法对样品进行需氧菌总数、霉菌和酵母菌计数方法适用性试验,试验组与菌液对照组的比值为0.5~2,采用常规法进行控制菌检查方法适用性试验,试验组检出阳性试验菌。所建立的方法可作为双葛止泻口服液微生物限度的检查方法。 相似文献
3.
Alterations due to dilution and anticoagulant effects in hematologic analysis of rodent blood samples on the Sysmex XT‐2000iV 下载免费PDF全文
4.
5.
Density fractionation along with ultrasonic dispersion is widely applied in soil science to obtain distinct fractions of soil organic matter. Density cut‐off and dispersion energy are crucial parameters to yield fractions closely corresponding to their conceptual definitions. Our literature review revealed methodological discrepancies in the utilization of density‐fractionation schemes. Strikingly, reasons for the selection of specific density or dispersion energy were rarely explained. Thus, it is not known how results of different approaches relate to each other. We therefore recommend testing and reporting effects of fractionation parameters on chemical and physical properties of fractions, to achieve agreement and coherence on parameters to be used and facilitate comparability in future studies. 相似文献
6.
土壤环境基准/标准研究需要解决的基础性问题 总被引:11,自引:3,他引:8
土壤环境基准/标准研究是一个复杂的系统工程,涉及到多方面的基础性问题。了解和解决其所涉及的这些基础性问题,是土壤环境基准/标准是否科学准确并在国家层面上能否全面应用的前提。本文从土壤环境基准/标准研究相关的概念及其内涵、基础方法标准化、生物受体的选择和变量归一化4大方面阐述了土壤环境基准/标准研究需要解决的基础性问题,从而为全面系统地开展此项研究工作提供思想、理论、方法和技术等依据。具体来说,包括"环境质量"、"土壤环境质量"、"土壤质量"、"土壤污染"、"污染土壤"、"土壤环境质量基准"、"污染土壤修复基准"等诸多相关概念,采样、前处理、分析步骤和测试方法等的统一与标准化,敏感种与优势种等生物受体的正确选择,以及涉及到总量与有效态或提取态、复合污染与交互作用的情况、土壤本身的一些影响因素(土壤类型、有机质、粘粒、pH、Eh和CEC等)、土壤外部的一些影响因素(地理区域、温度、水分或湿度、施肥或农业措施等)诸多变量的基础数据的归一化处理。最后,结合这些基础性问题,对土壤环境基准/标准的研究进行了展望。 相似文献
7.
用羧甲基壳聚糖-膨润土复合吸附剂吸附处理模拟含铜废水,在pH为6,吸附30 min达到吸附平衡,吸附容量为114.54 mg·g-1。通过三因素三水平中心组合试验设计及响应面分析法,对各因素的影响作用进行了分析,结果表明各因素对吸附容量影响的重要性依次为初始浓度﹥pH值﹥吸附时间。研究优化了复合吸附剂对铜离子吸附工艺参数,得出吸附最优条件:pH值为6.00,初始浓度为33.00 mg·L-1,吸附时间为25.00 min。在此条件下吸附容量为111.81 mg·g-1,与理论值较吻合。 相似文献
8.
G. G. Striker 《Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science》2008,194(4):249-255
Plant responses to flooding have been studied and reviewed extensively. However, the differences among the experimental procedures used to apply the flood that lead to such responses have never been explored. In this work, a database of 132 articles was created to quantify important methodological aspects of flooding experiments in crop and non-crop species for the first time as well as to look for thematic gaps in our knowledge on flooding research. Results showed that the flood experiments were conducted differently for crop and non-crop species, with two main distinctions: the duration of the flood and the consideration of competition among plants. For crop species, experimental flooding had a short duration of 16 days (ranging from 8 to 28 days for the 25th and 75th percentiles), while for non-crop species, flooding was quite longer, nearly 45 days (ranging from 28 to 61.5 days). Also, 53 % of the examined experiments in crop species considered competition among plants in their experimental protocol, while only 20 % did so for non-crop species. Regarding the topics least investigated within this area, in terms of both crop and non-crop species, future investigation should focus on the effects of flooding on reproductive traits, mineral nutrition and the nitrogen fixation of plants. These results are discussed, along with their implications in terms of defining crucial aspects of the methodology of flooding experiments. 相似文献
9.
陈海 《安徽农业大学学报》2020,29(4):108-114
道德直觉是当下道德哲学研究领域的热门话题。如果道德直觉可以成为道德探究的基础,那么其可靠性必须得到保证。论证道德直觉的可靠性,可以将道德直觉作一种道德判断的方法论来理解。而作为道德判断方法论的道德直觉就带有明显的反思平衡的特性。但反思平衡在道德探究中是否具有基础性地位依然存疑。回答这一疑问的方法,就是构建一种持基础主义立场的反思平衡。道德直觉就是这样一种持基础主义立场的反思平衡,因此道德直觉可以成为道德探究的基础。 相似文献
1