首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   1篇
林业   1篇
  1篇
  2019年   1篇
  2009年   1篇
排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Information on soil carbon sequestration and its interaction with nitrogen availability is rather limited, since soil processes account for the most significant unknowns in the C and N cycles. In this paper we compare three completely different approaches to calculate carbon sequestration in forest soils. The first approach is the limit-value concept, in which the soil carbon accumulation is estimated by multiplying the annual litter fall with the recalcitrant fraction of the decomposing plant litter, which depends on the nitrogen and calcium content in the litter. The second approach is the N-balance method, where carbon sequestration is calculated from the nitrogen retention in the soil multiplied with the present soil C/N ratio in organic layer and mineral topsoil. The third approach is the dynamic SMART2 model in combination with an empirical approach to assess litter fall inputs. The comparison is done by first validating the methods at three chronosequences with measured C pools, two in Denmark and one in Sweden, and then application on 192 intensive monitoring plots located in the Northern and Western part of Europe. Considering all three chronosequences, the N-balance method was generally most in accordance with the C pool measurements, although the SMART2 model was also quite consistent with the measurements at two chronosequences. The limit-value approach generally overestimated the soil carbon sequestration. At the intensive monitoring plots, the limit-value concept calculated the highest carbon sequestration, ranging from 160 to 978 kg ha−1 year−1, followed by the N-balance method which ranged from 0 to 535 kg ha−1 year−1. With SMART2 we calculated the lowest carbon sequestration from −30 to 254 kg ha−1 year−1. All the three approaches found lower carbon sequestration at a latitude from 60 to 70° compared to latitudes from 40 to 50 and from 50 to 60. Considering the validation of the three approaches, the range in results from both the N-balance method and SMART2 model seems most appropriate.  相似文献   
2.
慈溪1000年时间序列农田土壤氮矿化和硝化的变化   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
汪峰  姚红燕  陈若霞  陈贵  戴瑶璐 《土壤学报》2019,56(5):1161-1170
长时间序列土壤关键氮(N)转化过程和相关微生物的变化规律仍不清楚。以慈溪市滨海围垦农田土壤为研究对象,利用室内培养法研究了11个不同利用年限土壤(0~1 000 a)N矿化速率、硝化强度和硝化细菌数量。结果表明,随着利用年限的增加,土壤电导率和pH下降,而有机质和全氮逐渐积累,土壤性质在利用前50 a内变化幅度较快;土壤N矿化速率的大小表现为:220~1 000 a >0~50 a >60~200 a;硝化强度大体随着利用年限的延长而增强,而土壤硝化细菌数量表现为在0~20 a增加后逐渐降低的趋势,其中,20~60 a达到最高;皮尔森相关和聚类推进树(ABT)分析表明,土壤利用年限(45%)、电导率(12%)和有机质(11%)是影响硝化强度的主控因子,土壤中NH4+-N和有效磷含量分别是影响N矿化速率(86%)和硝化细菌数量(42%)的关键限制因子。因此,海陆界面土壤在持续农业利用过程中,硝化强度及硝化细菌丰度得到一定加强,但同时受到历史条件和当代环境因素的共同影响。  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号