Effects of intracoelomic alfaxalone–dexmedetomidine on righting reflex in common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis): preliminary data

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on alfaxalone immobilization in snakes.Study designNonblinded, crossover study.AnimalsA total of eight mature common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis).MethodsSnakes were administered each of three treatments intracoelomically: alfaxalone (30 mg kg^–1; treatment A), alfaxalone (30 mg kg^–1) combined with dexmedetomidine (0.05 mg kg^–1; treatment AD0.05); and alfaxalone (30 mg kg^–1) combined with dexmedetomidine (0.10 mg kg^–1; treatment AD0.10). A minimum of 10 days elapsed between experimental trials. Times to loss of righting reflex (LRR) and return of righting reflex (RRR) were recorded. Heart rate (HR) was recorded every 5 minutes throughout the period of LRR and averaged for each snake. Times to LRR and RRR, and mean HR in snakes that achieved LRR were reported.ResultsLRR occurred in eight (100%), five (63%) and three (38%) snakes in treatments A, AD0.05 and AD0.10, respectively. For all treatments, time to LRR ranged 3–20 minutes. Median (range) times to RRR were 39 (30–46), 89 (62–128) and 77 (30–185) minutes for treatments A, AD0.05 and AD0.10, respectively. In animals where righting reflex was lost, mean HR was lower in all dexmedetomidine treatments compared with treatment A.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn this pilot study, alfaxalone resulted in reliable immobilization, whereas dexmedetomidine and alfaxalone combinations resulted in highly variable durations of immobilization with low HR in immobilized animals. For snakes that achieved LRR, the addition of dexmedetomidine (0.05 mg kg^–1) to alfaxalone appeared to extend the period of immobilization compared with alfaxalone alone.     

The effect of butorphanol on the incidence of dexmedetomidine‐induced emesis in cats

ObjectiveTo evaluate the antiemetic effect of butorphanol (BUT) when co-administered with dexmedetomidine (DEX) in cats.Study designDouble-blind, randomized controlled cross-over experimental study.AnimalsFourteen purpose-bred healthy Domestic Short Hair cats, seven females and seven males, aged median (range) 14–84 (78) months and weighing 1.7–5.5 (4.0) kg.MethodsEach cat received five different treatment protocols intramuscularly (IM): (A) 25 μg kg⁻¹ DEX; (B) 20 μg kg⁻¹ DEX and 0.2 mg kg⁻¹ BUT; (C) 20 μg kg⁻¹ DEX and 0.1 mg kg⁻¹ BUT; (D) 25 μg kg⁻¹ DEX and 0.2 mg kg⁻¹ BUT; and (E) 20 μg kg⁻¹ DEX. Episodes of emesis, incidence and severity of nausea, and time to lateral recumbency were recorded for a period of 8 minutes after treatment administration, and the sedation was scored at the end of this period. The Friedman test and the Cochran’s Q-test were used to analyse the data. Significance was evaluated at the 5% level.ResultsThe proportion of cats that vomited was significantly lower with the treatment protocols that included BUT (B, C and D) compared with the protocols that included only DEX (A and E). The proportion of cats that had nausea was significantly higher with the protocols that included only DEX (A and E) compared with protocols B and D. Time to lateral recumbency (p = 0.09) and sedation score (p = 0.07) was not statistically different between the treatment protocols.Conclusions and clinical relevanceButorphanol can be used to prevent emesis and reduce the incidence and the severity of nausea caused by DEX in cats. It seems that the combination of BUT and DEX is very useful not only when emesis could result in serious complications, but also to provide comfort and well-being in cats sedated for minor procedures.     

Medetomidine and dexmedetomidine: a review of cardiovascular effects and antinociceptive properties in the dog

Alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor agonists (alpha(2)-agonists) are commonly used in small animal anaesthesia for their potent sedative and analgesic properties, although concerns about their cardiovascular effects have prevented their full adoption into veterinary practice. Research into alpha(2) adrenoreceptor agonists and their clinical use is extensive, therefore this review focuses on the use of dexmedetomidine and medetomidine in dogs. Emphasis is given to the cardiovascular effects and antinociceptive action of these agents.     

Effects of a constant‐rate infusion of dexmedetomidine on the minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in ponies

Reasons for performing study: Dexmedetomidine has been administered in the equine as a constant‐rate infusion (CRI) during inhalation anaesthesia, preserving optimal cardiopulmonary function with calm and coordinated recoveries. Inhalant anaesthetic sparing effects have been demonstrated in other species, but not in horses. Objectives: To determine the effects of a CRI of dexmedetomidine on the minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane in ponies. Methods: Six healthy adult ponies were involved in this prospective, randomised, crossover, blinded, experimental study. Each pony was anaesthetised twice (3 weeks washout period). After induction with sevoflurane in oxygen (via nasotracheal tube), the ponies were positioned on a surgical table (T0), and anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (expired sevoflurane fraction 2.5%) in 55% oxygen. The ponies were randomly allocated to treatment D (dexmedetomidine 3.5 µg/kg bwt i.v. [T10–T15] followed by a CRI of dexmedetomidine at 1.75 µg/kg bwt/h) or treatment S (bolus and CRI of saline at the same volume and rate as treatment D). After T60, MAC determination, using a classic bracketing technique, was initiated. Stimuli consisted of constant‐current electrical stimuli at the skin of the lateral pastern region. Triplicate MAC estimations were obtained and averaged in each pony. Monitoring included pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, anaesthetic gas monitoring, arterial blood pressure measurement and arterial blood gases. Normocapnia was maintained by mechanical ventilation. Analysis of variance (treatment and period as fixed factors) was used to detect differences between treatments (α= 0.05). Results: An intravenous (i.v.) dexmedetomidine CRI decreased mean ± s.d. sevoflurane MAC from 2.42 ± 0.55 to 1.07 ± 0.21% (mean MAC reduction 53 ± 15%). Conclusions and potential relevance: A dexmedetomidine CRI at the reported dose significantly reduces the MAC of sevoflurane.     

Prolonged anesthesia using sevoflurane,remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in a horse

HistoryA 10–year old Arabian mare had a slow–growing mass on the lower right mandible and required a large partial mandibulectomy.Physical examinationNo abnormalities were detected apart from the mass.ManagementA temporary tracheostomy was performed pre–operatively. Anesthesia was induced with xylazine followed by ketamine and diazepam. For 13 hours, anesthesia was maintained using sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions, with the exception of surgical preparation time. Intra–operatively, ventilation was delivered through the cuffed tracheotomy tube. Heart and respiratory rates, ECG, arterial pressures, inspired and expired gases, pulse oximetry values and body temperature were monitored. Dobutamine and whole blood were necessary, and romifidine was used to control recovery. Post–operatively, phenylbutazone and buprenorphine given systemically and bupivacaine administered through a wound soaker catheter were used to provide analgesia. Head–shaking from buprenorphine was controlled with acepromazine and detomidine once standing after 87 minutes in recovery. For 3 days after surgery, analgesia was provided with butorphanol, phenylbutazone and bupivacaine. The mare recovered well, appeared comfortable and started eating the following day with no signs of ileus.Follow–upSeven months later, the mare was doing well.ConclusionsSevoflurane, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions were suitable for a long and invasive procedure.     

Changes in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane and some cardiopulmonary measurements during three continuous infusion rates of dexmedetomidine in dogs

OBJECTIVE: To measure the change in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane associated with three constant rate infusions of dexmedetomidine. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, and blinded experimental trial. Animals Six healthy 6-year-old Beagles weighing between 13.0 and 17.7 kg. METHODS: The dogs received each of four treatments; saline or dexmedetomidine at 0.1, 0.5 or 3 microg kg(-1) loading dose given intravenously (IV) over 6 minutes followed by infusions at 0.1, 0.5 or 3 microg kg(-1) hour(-1), respectively. There were 2 weeks between treatments. The dogs were mask-induced with and maintained on isoflurane in oxygen. Acetated Ringer's (5 mL kg(-1) hour(-1)) and saline or dexmedetomidine (each at 0.5 mL kg(-1) hour(-1)) were given IV. Pulse rate, blood pressure, samples for the measurement of blood gases, pH, lactate, packed cell volume (PCV), total protein (TP) and dexmedetomidine concentrations were obtained from an arterial catheter. Sixty minutes after induction minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined by intermittently applying supramaximal electrical stimuli to the thoracic and pelvic limbs. Cardiopulmonary measurements and arterial blood samples were collected before each set of stimuli. Statistical analyses were conducted with analysis of variance or mixed models according to the experimental design. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the MAC of isoflurane associated with 0.5 and 3 microg kg(-1) hour(-1) but not with 0.1 mg kg(-1)hour(-1). Serum concentrations of dexmedetomidine were not measurable at the 0.1 mg kg(-1) hour(-1) and averaged 0.198 +/- 0.081 and 1.903 +/-0.621 ng mL(-1) for the 0.5 and 3 microg kg(-1) hour(-1) infusion rates, respectively. Heart rate decreased with increasing doses of dexmedetomidine while blood pressure increased. Packed cell volume increased at 3 microg kg(-1) hour(-1) but not with other doses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dexmedetomidine infusions decrease the intra-operative requirement for isoflurane and may be useful in managing dogs undergoing surgery, where the provision of analgesia and limitation of the stress response is desirable.     

A comparison of cardiopulmonary effects and anaesthetic requirements of two dexmedetomidine continuous rate infusions in alfaxalone-anaesthetized Greyhounds

Objective

To determine the effects of two dexmedetomidine continuous rate infusions on the minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), and subsequent haemodynamic and recovery effects in Greyhounds undergoing laparoscopic ovariohysterectomy.

Postinduction apnoea in dogs premedicated with acepromazine or dexmedetomidine and anaesthetized with alfaxalone or propofol

Objective

To compare incidence and duration of postinduction apnoea in dogs after premedication with methadone and acepromazine (MA) or methadone and dexmedetomidine (MD) followed by induction with propofol (P) or alfaxalone (A).