The effect of harvesting system on nutrient losses during silage making. 1. Field losses

An experiment was carried out during 1982 in which the effects of three differing harvesting systems on the field losses occurring during the conservation of grass as silage were examined. The treatments were either (a) harvesting herbage directly by means of a flail harvester (unwilted flail, UF), or (b) pre-cu ing of herbage with a rotary drum mower and lifting using a precision-chop forage harvester with wilting (WP) and without wilting (UP). Herbage was harvested on 26 May, 21 July and 7 September 1982. The mean yields of herbage produced from plots harvested by the three systems were not significantly different, with dry ma er (DM) yields of 12470, 12300 and 12230 kg ha^-1 for the UF, UP and WP treatments respectively. However, field losses with the UP and WP treatments were greater than with the UF treatment (P<0·01). As a result the yields of herbage ensiled with the UP and WP treatments, 11690 and 11320 kg DM ha^-1 respectively, were significantly lower than with the UF treatment, 12710 kg DM ha^-1 (P <0·05). Wilting of first cut herbage for a period of 72 h resulted in a significant reduction (P<0·05) in digestible organic ma er (DOM) concentration (determined in vitro), whereas small increases in DOM concentration were observed following wilting of second and third harvest material.
It is concluded that, even under favourable weather conditions, both pre-cutting and wilting of herbage prior to harvesting can result in considerable losses of nutrients in the field.     

The practical and economic consequences of integrating maize with grass production on dairy farms in southern England: a computer simulation

A mathematical model of the production, harvesting and utilization of maize and grass silage on a dairy farm with an autumn-calving herd is described. Using the model the comparative costs and benefits of growing and feeding maize in place of grass silage are examined for three sites in southern England. It is concluded that a winter milk production system based on maize rather than grass should improve profits by at least £30, and possibly by as much as £80 cow^-1. This financial improvement is attributable to higher feed intakes and lower harvesting and fertilizer costs with maize silage. Simulating the results over a 10-year period also revealed that the switch from grass to maize should lower the risks in terms of the annual variability of silage yields and herd profits. Furthermore, it would appear unnecessary to completely turn over from grass to maize production to realize a significant financial benefit. Setting aside just 25% of the conservation area to maize and feeding a mixture of maize and grass silage is projected to increase profits from winter milk production by £30 to £45 cow^-1.     

Supplementary feeding of forage to grazing dairy cows, 3. The effect of three daytime stocking rates on the performance of cows offered grass silage overnight

Over a 24-week period, three groups of dairy cows were continuously stocked at 8, 10 or 12 cows ha^-1 between morning and afternoon milkings, and overnight were housed and offered grass silage ad libitum. Due to a prolonged drought, sward heights only averaged 4·1 cm.
The increase in daytime stocking rate led to a decline in herbage intake, and increases in silage intake. At the highest stocking rate (12 cows ha^-1), the silage intake failed to compensate for the reduced herbage intake. Consequently the total dry matter and estimated metabolizable energy intakes were lower than for the 8 and 10 cows ha^-1 treatments. Milk yields and milk composition were not significantly affected by treatment but the 12 cows ha^-1 stocking rate gave the lowest milk and milk solids yields.
The utilized metabolizable energy (UME) on the grazed swards was greatest for the 10 cows ha^-1 treatment. The sward cut to provide the silage had a UME level (GJ ha^-1) 32% greater on average than the grazed swards during the same growth period. The total areas utilized for grazing and silage production for 8, 10 and 12 cows ha^-1 were 0·240, 0·224 and 0·215 ha respectively. Fat and protein yields per unit area were greatest for the 10 cows ha^-1 group.     

The effect of frequency of harvesting grass for silage on the intake and performance of beef cattle

Two randomized-block experiments were conducted to examine the effects of frequency of harvesting grass for silage on the intake and performance of beef cattle. In both experiments swards of S24 perennial ryegrass were harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals throughout the growing season. Grass harvested before and after 10 July was ensiled separately and termed spring and autumn silage respectively. In Experiment 1 the silages were offered ad libitum either unsupplemented or supplemented with 2 kg barley per head daily to eighty-four Hereford-cross weaned, single-suckled steer calves of mean initial live weight 284 kg, in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial design. Silage dry matter (DM) intakes and liveweight gains for the silages harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals were 4.80, 0.72; 4.49,0.76; and 4.62,0.78 kg d⁻¹ for the spring silages and 4.69, 0.67; 4.59, 0.85; and 4.55,0.86 kg d⁻¹ for the autumn silages respectively. There was no significant interaction between frequency of harvesting and concentrate supplementation. In Experiment 2 the silages were offered ad libitum and unsupplemented to forty-two Hereford-cross weaned, single-suckled steer calves of mean initial live weight 240 kg, and forty-two Hereford-cross store cattle of mean initial live weight 356 kg, in a 3 × 2 × 2 factorial design. Silage DM intakes and liveweight gains for the silages harvested at 63-, 49- and 38-d intervals were 4.94,0.49; 5.69,0.80; and 619,0.93 kg d⁻¹ for the spring silages and 5.50, 0.61; 5.57, 0.72; and 505, 0.65 kg d⁻¹ for the autumn silages respectively. There were no significant interactions between frequency of harvesting and type of animal. It is concluded that a cutting interval of 49 d commencing on 21 May is likely to be optimum for this type of sward except under exceptional weather conditions.     

Barley/pea mixtures as cover crops for grass re-seeds

Substantial annual fluctuations in the performance of arable silage mixtures, comprising Minerva forage pea and Goldmarker barley, were observed from ten annual sowings between 1977 and 1986, Total dry matter (DM) yield varied between 2·5 and 11·5 t ha⁻¹. Dry matter content also ranged widely from 10·3% to 20·0% and there was a large variation in the proportion of peas in the DM (0·44 to 0·90). Almost 80% of this yield variation was due to the fluctuation in pea performance and over 60% of all yield variation was related to the variation in sunshine hours and air temperature.
In 1983 and 1984 differences in seed rate of between 20 and 140 kg ha⁻¹ of Minerva and 80 and 160 kg ha⁻¹ of Goldmarker influenced the forage composition at harvest, with the pea component capable of outgrowing and suppressing the other species when sown at over 80 kg ha⁻¹. Very high yields of peas were associated with increasing stress on the undersown grass re-seed and were considered undesirable.
It was concluded that sowing rates of between 120 and 160 kg ha⁻¹ for barley and a maximum of 60 kg ha⁻¹ for peas would, in most years, provide the best compromise between attaining good arable silage yields and avoiding excessive dangers of damage of undersown grass re-seeds.     

Effects of treating lucerne with an inoculum of lactic acid bacteria or formic acid upon chemical changes during fermentation, and upon the nutritive value of the silage for lambs

A second cut of lucerne was wilted to 500 g DM kg⁻¹ and either left untreated (control) or treated with formic acid (4.5 1 fresh forage t⁻¹) or with a commercial inoculum of lactic acid bacteria (10⁵ colony forming units (cfu) g forage⁻¹). The forages were ensiled in 2-t capacity silos for 8 months, and later fed to six lambs (mean initial weight 27.7 ±1.60 kg) in a 3x3 duplicated Latin square with 27-d periods. Portions of the untreated and additive-treated forages were also ensiled in laboratory silos at 25 ° C for intervals up to 42 d. Results from the laboratory silos showed that the major increase in ammonia-N in silage occurred between 40 h and 7 d of fermentation; during this period, both formic acid and the inoculant produced a smaller increase in ammonia-N, than did the control. The pH of inoculated silage declined from 5.74 to 4.57 in 7 d, but it took 14 d for the pH of the control silage to fall below 5.0. Formic acid treatment immediately reduced the silage pH from 5.74 to 5.10 ( P < 0·01); the pH then remained unchanged until 21 d, after which it decreased slightly. When compared with control, lambs fed formic acid-treated silage consumed more ( P < 0·05) digestible organic matter; the response was associated with a trend towards decreased concentration of ammonia in plasma. Inoculation of lucerne silage did not ( P < 0·05) affect voluntary intake but increased ( P <0.05) apparent digestibility of fibre and tended to increase N retention.     

Supplementary forage for grazing sheep. 1. Effects on lactating ewes and lambs

In two experiments, ewes in weeks 1–20 of lactation received either pasture only or pasture plus ad libitum conserved forage. Herbage height was maintained at 3·3–3·4 cm on both treatments by manipulation of stocking rate in the 24 plots (twelve per treatment) used for the experiment with additional ewes and lambs. In experiment 1, silage, which was of lower metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) contents than the grazed herbage, was consumed at an average of 375 g dry matter (DM) ewe⁻¹ d⁻¹. In experiment 2 a strawmix, containing (g kg ⁻¹ freshweight) 480 g barley straw, 300 g concentrate and 220 g molasses, again with a lower ME and CP content than the grazed herbage, was consumed at an average of 165 g DM ewe ⁻¹ d ⁻¹. In both experiments ewes not receiving forage lost weight whereas those with forage gained weight and tended to have increased body condition scores. Offering silage or strawmix did not affect lamb liveweight gain or stocking rate.     

Effect of harvesting system on nutrient losses during silage making. 2. In-silo losses

Nutrient losses during the in-silo period were determined following the ensiling of grass using three differing harvesting systems. The treatments were either (a) harvesting herbage directly by means of a flail harvester (unwilted flail, UF) or (b) pre-mowing of herbage with a rotary drum mower and lifting using a precision chop forage harvester with wilting (WP) and without wilting (UP). Herbage was harvested and ensiled over the period 26–29 May 1982, and a good fermentation was achieved with all three silages. Losses of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP) during the in-silo period were greatest with the UF system, intermediate with the UP system and lowest with the WP system. Gross energy losses followed the same trend with losses (as a percentage of ensiled levels) of 18·6, 9·8 and 4·4% for the UF, UP and WP systems, respectively. Gross energy loss as effluent accounted for 24% and 22% of total gross energy ensiled for the UF and UP treatments. Patterns of effluent flow differed between the two unwilted silages with a higher peak flow rate with the UF material. Total effluent production at 354 ml (kg DM ensiled)^-1 was greater for the UF material than for the UP material (288 ml (kg DM ensiled)^-1). Nutrient loss through surface waste was similar for all three silages whereas gross energy losses arising through residual respiration, fermentation and gaseous loss amounted to 149%, 6·7% and 31% of that ensiled for the UF, UP and WP silages, respectively. The results of this study, taken in conjunction with those of an earlier study where field losses were assessed, indicate that recovery of gross energy during silage making was very similar for the UP and WP systems and only marginally greater than that recovered with the UF system.     

A comparison of methods of establishing swedes following an early silage cut

Experiments were carried out over three seasons in which swedes were sown by precision drilling after ploughing and conventional cultivation or by direct drilling with two types of drill at two row widths with and without shallow cultivation. The swedes were sown in June or early July following a first silage cut and sward desiccation with paraquat. Precision drilling with inter-row cultivation and singling gave a uniform weed-free stand and had the highest mean yield of over 8 t DM ha⁻¹ Where hoeing was omitted yields were reduced due to weed competition. Yields following direct drilling were lower than with precision drilling due to uneven plant establishment, weed competition and grass regrowth. A shallow rotavation prior to direct drilling improved uniformity and yields and reduced grass regrowth. Direct drilling produced high numbers of small roots. The highest root yields were associated with sowing in early June and harvesting in December or January. Overall yields from the silage cut plus direct drilled swedes and silage cut plus precision drilled swedes were 12 and 13 t DM ha⁻¹respectively compared with about 14 t DM ha⁻¹expected from a grass sward.     

Effect of herbage water-soluble carbohydrate content and weather conditions at ensilage on the fermentation of grass silages made on commercial farms

A total of 1009 samples of silage made in bunker silos on commercial farms between 1972 and 1978 was analysed to investigate the effect of herbage water-soluble carbohydrate content (WSC) and weather conditions at ensilage on fermentation as measured by ammonia-N concentration and pH of first-cut grass silages.
Silage dry matter (DM) content had the major effect on fermentation. Factors influencing silage DM were rainfall and hours of sunshine during silage making, and DM content of the grass cut. WSC content of herbage ensiled also had a significant effect on subsequent fermentation. The major influences on herbage WSC were hours of sunshine and rainfall during the growing season.
The effect of chemical additives, albeit at poorly defined and often inadequate rates, was small in comparison to that of silage DM.
The minimum DM necessary to produce well-fermented silage without additive was approximately 260 g kg⁻¹. Use of formic acid significantly reduced this requirement to 240 g kg⁻¹ and to 252 g kg⁻¹ for sulphuric add + formalin. The results indicate that the minimum herbage WSC necessary to prevent a clostridial fermentation developing in silage with a DM content of 230 g kg⁻¹ is approximately 37 g kg⁻¹ without additive and 30 g kg⁻¹ with formic acid.
It is concluded that on commercial farms, weather conditions i.e. amount of rainfall and sunshine prior to and at ensilage, have a greater effect on subsequent silage fermentation than additive use.