THE EFFECT OF CONDITIONING ON THE RATE OF DRYING AND LOSS OF NUTRIENTS IN HAY

Treating cut herbage with a roller-crusher or a crimper resulted in an increased drying rate compared with tedding. A higher rate of drying was obtained when herbage was treated within a short period of the crop being cut, this effect being more marked with the crimper than with the tedder. Nutrient loss was higher when a crimper was used than with a roller-crusher or tedder. Applying water at an early stage in the drying process did not have a marked effect on nutrient loss, but appeared to decrease the digestibility of the crimped hay.     

CHANGES IN CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND THE LOSS OF NUTRIENTS IN TRIPODED AND SWATH-CURED HAY

The changes in chemical composition during haymaking, the loss of nutrients in the field and during storage, and the nutritive value of swath-cured and tripoded hay were compared. In good weather no advantage was gained by tripoding the hay. The nutritive value of the hays made by the two methods was similar and the loss of dry matter in the field slightly lower in the swath-cured hay. In a bad season, however, the nutrient loss in the swath-cured hay greatly exceeded that occurring in the tripoded hay and the starch equivalent, as shown by the results of digestibility trials, was markedly lower for the swath-cured.     

Hay production from lowland semi-natural grasslands: a review of implications for ruminant livestock systems

Data on total, seasonal and between-year variability in the productivity and nutritional quality of cut forages obtained from a range of lowland semi-natural grasslands are reviewed. Dry-matter production, as hay, from unfertilized species-rich semi-natural grasslands ranged from less than 20% to about 80% of the production that might be expected from agriculturally improved and intensively managed grasslands. Unfertilized species-rich grasslands had lower growth rates, reflecting low nutrient availability in spring and early summer. Low soil phosphorus availability appears to be a key factor allowing high species-richness to be maintained. The in vitro digestibilities of herbage cut for hay from semi-natural grasslands were 20%, or more, below values for conserved forages from intensively managed grassland. When losses incurred during the hay-making process were taken into account, then the nitrogen content of hays from many semi-natural grasslands appear to be sub-optimal for productive livestock. Metabolizable energy values of herbage cut for hay were 10–40% below values for intensively managed conserved grass. Phosphorus content of forages from most species-rich grasslands was either below the metabolic requirement of livestock or inadequate to sustain high individual animal performance. Potential problems associated with supplementation of the diet with phosphorus, and with high calcium-to-phosphorus ratios, are discussed. Although potassium content of most of the herbage cut for hay was adequate for productive ruminant livestock, exceptions arise with hay cut after July. The magnesium content of cut herbage from some semi-natural grasslands was below an adequate level for productive livestock. Most cut herbage appeared to contain adequate amounts of sodium. Inadequacy of the mineral content of hays from semi-natural grasslands for ruminant livestock will be exacerbated by nutrient losses incurred during the hay-making process and particularly so when hay- making is prolonged by wet weather. Few feeding studies using hays from semi-natural grasslands of high nature conservation interest have been conducted. Lack of such data makes it difficult to plan any integrated use of these hays in ruminant feed budgets for livestock systems.     

THE ENERGY VALUE OF BARN-DRIED HAY

Recent publications dealing with the efficiency of utilization of dietary energy by ruminants suggest that metabolizable- and net-energy values may be calculated with reasonable precision from digestible-energy values. Use has been made here of existing data to estimate the metabolizable-energy (M. E.) and net-energy values for maintenance and fattening (N. E._m and N. E._f) of 5 samples of barn-dried hay of known in vivo digestibility, firstly to provide such figures for good quality barn-dried hays and, secondly, to illustrate a method of estimating energy values for hays that might be useful for routine advisory purposes.     

THE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL TREATMENT ON THE RATE OF DRYING AND LOSS OF NUTRIENTS IN HAY

Trials are described in which various mechanical treatments of hay in the field were compared. Cutting the crop with a forage harvester resulted in very rapid drying of the hay, but this was accompanied by very high nutrient losses. When the crop was tedded with the harvester the hay dried more quickly than with conventional ledding, the nutrient loss being similar for these two treatments. Tedding with either a harvester or a conventional machine appeared to increase the loss of nutrients compared with less severe treatment, but this loss appears to be acceptable as tedding considerably reduces the risk of the hay being weathered.     

The effect of propionic acid on the storage losses of hay

Storage losses in moist hay treated with propionic acid were compared with those occurring in untreated moist hay in two experiments and with field-cured hay in three experiments. Dry matter losses in treated hays ranged from 41 to 8.6% and from 1.7 to 12.6% in untreated hays. Digestible organic matter losses in both treated and untreated hays were generally greater than dry matter losses. Only in one experiment did propionic acid application significantly reduce nutrient losses in moist hays. Nutrient losses, and water-soluble carbohydrate losses in particular, were shown to be correlated with maximum and cumulative bale temperatures during storage in two of the experiments. The rise in hale temperatures during storage was reduced in all three experiments, to a greater or lesser extent, by application of the additive. Loss of propionic acid from the hay during and after application was very large. In the three experiments 86.2, 85.3 and 85.6% of the acid applied was lost by the end of the storage period. Acid distribution studies indicated that variation in acid concentration within bales was as great as between bales. It was concluded that more research is needed into applicator design and position on the baler and into alternative application methods if the benefits of propionic acid as a moist hay preservative are to be fully exploited.     

LOSSES IN THE CONSERVATION OF HEAVILY-WILTED HERBAGE SEALED IN POLYTHENE FILM IN LINED TRENCH SILOS

A conservation experiment is described in which the losses in ensiling heavily-wilted herbage, of approximately 50% dry matter, in lined trench silos, with and without a polyethylene film seal, are compared. The composition and digestibility of the silages produced in the sealed silos were comparable with those of the original herbage. The content of organic acids in the sealed silos was low, suggesting that fermentation was suppressed by the partially gas-tight seal. In the unsealed silos there was considerable spoilage, 70% of the material being inedible. In the 2 sealed silos losses of dry matter were 8·2 and 5·2% and losses of SE 11·5 and 7·8%, respectively. The losses recorded are compared with those usually encountered in lined trench silos.     

Silage and milk production: comparisons between hays of different digestibilities as silage supplements

In three separate feeding experiments using a total of thirty individually-housed Ayrshire cows three silages made from perennial ryegrass were given ad libitum together with supplements of four different hays in the long form. The in vitro D-values of the silages ranged from 0·298 to 0·283, and the hays from 0·280 to 0·200. The daily intake of hay DM varied from 0·2 to 4·2 kg per cow and was given either without or with a daily maximum of 2·2 kg concentrate DM containing 379–527 g CP per kg DM. On average, 1 kg hay DM decreased silage intake by 0·24 kg DM with a range of 0·21–1·20 kg. The hay supplements had only small and non-significant effects on total DM intake, milk yield and milk composition, but increased the daily intake of drinking water. In three behavioural studies, the eating and ruminating times expressed as min per kg DM did not differ significantly between the various supplement treatments. It is concluded that hay has only a marginal value as a supplement for grass silage, although the hay could serve as a useful 'buffer' feed if the amount of silage was limited.     

A COMPARISON OF SILAGE AND BARN-DRIED HAY FOR BEEF PRODUCTION

Three trials were carried out to compare the feeding value of silage and barn-dried hay for fattening bullocks of approximately 8 cwt initial body weight. In each case the silage and hay were cut from the same sward at the same time. In the first trial the bullocks fed on hay gained 1·88 lb/day while those self-fed on silage gained 1·55 lb/day during a 70-day feeding period. In the second trial of 70 days, the bullocks fed on hay gained 1·96 lb/day and those fed on silage from a trough gained 2·39 lb/day. In the third trial, individually-fed bullocks housed in stalls and given the same hay and silage as used in Trial 2 gained 123 lb/day on hay and 127 lb/day on silage. The significance of these results is discussed in relation to the findings of other workers.     

A COMPARISON OF TWO HAYS FOR BEEF PRODUCTION

A medium quality barn-dried hay and a poor quality field-cured hay were each supplemented with 3 levels of concentrate in the diet of young beef cattle, averaging 313 kg liveweight. The supplement was given on predetermined hay concentrate metabolizable energy (ME) ratios based on the determined ME of the hays and an assumed ME of 3·0 McalsAg DM for the supplement. The hay concentrate ratios used were 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3, the aim being to provide a reasonable rate of growth (0·7 kg/day) with the poorer hay. It was necessary to include urea in the concentrate mixtures used on the 1:1 and 1:2 ratios with the field-cured hay. The urea appeared to have an adverse effect on the intake and utilization of DM on the 1:1 ratio. The range of mean intakes of supplement DM was 3·02 to 4·41 kg/day for the barn-dried hay and 2·23 to 4·61 for the field-cured hay. Mean daily liveweight gains with the barn-dried hay were 0·76, 0·89 and 0·85 kg for the 1:1, 1:2 and 1:3 ratios, respectively, with no significant difference between ratios. The mean daily gains with the field-cured hay were 0·39, 0·77 and 0·75 for the three ratios, the mean gain on the 1:1 ratio being significantly lower than those of the other ratios. The ME conversion ratios were not significantly affected by either ratios or hay type, except on the 1:1 ratio with field-cured hay. There were significant differences between the barn-dried hay and field-cured hay diets in the digestibilities of DM, organic matter, crude protein and energy; the mean coefficients for DM being 74·5% and 65·6%, respectively.     

Grass height as an indicator for supplementary feeding of continuously stocked dairy cows

Three groups of cows were continuously stocked on pasture and offered supplementary concentrates according to the herbage height measured weekly with a grass disc. Concentrates were offered when the mean herbage height fell below 9 cm for treatment A, 7 cm for treatment B and 5 cm for treatment C at a rate of 1 kg d^-1 for each 0·2-cm decline below these threshold levels. If the herbage height declined by more than 1·2 cm (8 kg concentrates d^-1) hay was offered in addition ad libitum. The stocking rates for all three treatments were 5·2, 3·2 and 3·2 cows ha^-1 for three successive 8-week periods. For treatments A, B and C the mean concentrate DM intakes were 3·2, 1·2 and 1·2 kg d^-1 (treatment A also received 0·2 kg hay DM d^-1), and the mean daily milk yields were 17·2, 16·2 and 15·2 kg respectively. The increasing level of supplementary feeding from treatment C to A also resulted in an increase in liveweight and body condition score change, and a reduction in milk fat.     

A REVIEW OF NUTRIENT LOSSES AND EFFICIENCY OF CONSERVING HERBAGE AS SILAGE, BARN-DRIED HAY AND FIELD-CURED HAY

A review of American literature indicates that barn drying of hay and silage making are both greatly superior to the field curing of hay in preserving nutrients. This is true of total dry matter, crude protein, ether extract and ash; crude-fibre losses are greater in silage making. Energy losses run parallel with dry matter. Bam drying of hay with heat preserves a rather greater proportion of nutrients than does silage making.
Chemical composition and digestibility are mostly a function of stage of maturity of the crop at the time of cutting. Actual carbohydrate (energy) losses are greater than protein losses in all methods. The influence of method of conservation is unimportant if conservation is properly carried out, but considerable deterioration can result from bad application. Field-cured hay usually suffers most in this respect, due to weather damage.
The conservation processes reviewed have no influence per se on feeding value where each is applied under ideal conditions. Differences found in practice are usually linked to the stage of maturity or to weather damage, which explains the usually superior feeding value of silage and barn-dried hay over field-cured hay.
When the efficiency of each method is compared by determining the quantity of milk produced from equal areas of forage, conserved in the three different ways, barn-dried hay is somewhat superior to silage, but both are greatly superior to field-cured hay.     

THE USE OF BARN-DRIED HAY AND SILAGE IN FATTENING YOUNG BEEF CATTLE

A series of trials was carried out in which barn-dried hay and silage were fed to young fattening cattle with or without supplementary barley. Liveweight-gains on silage and barn-dried hay alone were too low to provide an adequate finish during winter feeding. Liveweight-gains on hay alone were always higher than those obtained on silage alone, the difference being more marked in lighter animals. There was a marked response to supplements of 3 and 4 lb (1.4 and 1.8 kg) of barley, the response being significantly greater in silage-fed cattle than in those fed on barn-dried hay. There was some evidence of growth compensation with the introduction of a barley supplement to cattle on silage diets, but there was no such response in those fed on hay. Compensatory growth was not accompanied by improved digestibility or N retention.     

THE CONSERVATION OF HEAVILY–WILTED BALED HERBAGE IN SEALED POLYTHENE CONTAINERS

A conservation experiment is described in which the losses in ensiling heavily–wilted, baled herbage of 49–58% dry–matter content in a completely sealed polythene film is described. In addition, a comparison is made between silages with and without sodium metabisulphite added as a preservative. The mean DM loss for the control silages was 11.1%, and that for the metabisulphite–treated silages 12.8 %. These losses, and the individual crude–nutrient and digestible–nutrient losses are compared with those obtained for heavily–wilted and conventional silage made in lined trench silos. Metabolizable energy values for the grass and silages are also presented.     

The effect of harvesting system on nutrient losses during silage making. 1. Field losses

An experiment was carried out during 1982 in which the effects of three differing harvesting systems on the field losses occurring during the conservation of grass as silage were examined. The treatments were either (a) harvesting herbage directly by means of a flail harvester (unwilted flail, UF), or (b) pre-cu ing of herbage with a rotary drum mower and lifting using a precision-chop forage harvester with wilting (WP) and without wilting (UP). Herbage was harvested on 26 May, 21 July and 7 September 1982. The mean yields of herbage produced from plots harvested by the three systems were not significantly different, with dry ma er (DM) yields of 12470, 12300 and 12230 kg ha^-1 for the UF, UP and WP treatments respectively. However, field losses with the UP and WP treatments were greater than with the UF treatment (P<0·01). As a result the yields of herbage ensiled with the UP and WP treatments, 11690 and 11320 kg DM ha^-1 respectively, were significantly lower than with the UF treatment, 12710 kg DM ha^-1 (P <0·05). Wilting of first cut herbage for a period of 72 h resulted in a significant reduction (P<0·05) in digestible organic ma er (DOM) concentration (determined in vitro), whereas small increases in DOM concentration were observed following wilting of second and third harvest material.
It is concluded that, even under favourable weather conditions, both pre-cutting and wilting of herbage prior to harvesting can result in considerable losses of nutrients in the field.     

A STUDY OF WILTING CONDITIONS IN SOUTH-WEST ENGLAND

Moisture losses from swaths of long herbage were recorded on eleven occasions in May, June and September, in order to supply data on which to base advice on making prewilted silage. Mowing in the late afternoon and picking up the following afternoon and mowing in the morning and picking up in mid-afternoon both resulted in losses averaging 9·6%. These losses occurred in fairly dry weather throughout the season, even when it was cloudy and cool. Mowing in the late afternoon and picking up next morning, before dew or overnight rain had evaporated, resulted in negligible losses, averaging only 2·4%.     

Concentrate supplementation of grazing dairy cows. 2. Effect of concentrate composition on herbage intake and milk production

The effect of feeding either traditional concentrates containing starch or high quality fibrous concentrates on the performance of grazing dairy cows was examined in a trial in which cows were given concentrates with either 350 g starch and sugars (kg dry matter (DM))^-1 (high-starch) or 100 g starch and sugars (kg DM)^-1 (high-fibre). The swards used consisted predominantly of perennial ryegrass and were usually aftermaths following cutting. Each area was grazed for 3 or 4 d at each grazing and a two-machine sward-cutting technique was used for estimating herbage intake.
The effect of concentrate composition on the herbage intake of grazing cows at a high daily herbage allowance of 28 kg OM above 4 cm cutting height was investigated in 1983 and 1984. With 54 kg OM d^-1 of high-starch concentrates the mean herbage intake was 11·5 kg OM d^-1 per cow while cows fed 5.3 kg d^-1 of high-fibre concentrates consumed on average 12–6 kg OM d^-1. The mean substitution rate of herbage by concentrates was reduced from 0·45 kg herbage OM (kg concentrate OM)^-1 with the high-starch concentrate to 0·21 with the high-fibre concentrates.
The effect of the treatments on milk production was studied in 1984. The cows consumed 5·5 kg OM d^-1 as concentrates and grazed at a lower herbage allowance of 19 kg OM above 4 cm cutting height. With high-fibre concentrates milk production and 4% fat-corrected milk production were 13 and 1·8 kg d^-1, respectively, higher than with the high-starch treatment. The daily live weight gain with the high-starch concentrates was 0·17 kg per cow more than with the high-fibre concentrates.     

Some changes associated with the field drying of lucerne and timothy

Lucerne (approximately 10% flowering, 270 g dry matter kg⁻¹) and timothy (boot stage, 310 g dry matter kg⁻¹) were harvested and allowed to wilt for a period of 52·5 h. During the early stages of wilting of lucerne there were increases in the proportion of leaf material (dry weight basis), as well as increases in total available carbohydrate and water soluble carbohydrate concentrations. Approximately 50% of the leaf material in lucerne and in timothy was lost after a drying period of 52·5 h and after tedding and raking operations prior to baling of the hay. This resulted in considerable reduction in the protein content of both lucerne and timothy.     

THE EFFECT OF ENSILING ON CROP DIGESTIBILITY

The digestibilities of 22 herbages, and of the silages made from them, were measured with sheep: in two experiments batches of the same herbage were ensiled by several different methods. In every case the digestibilities of herbage and of the corresponding silages were found to be very similar, and no significant effect of method of ensilage on digestibility was found. The importance of using the true dry-matter content of silages (i.e. corrected for losses of volatile constituents during drying) is emphasized; a depression in the digestibility of herbage during ensilage is likely to be estimated unless this correction is made. These experiments have shown that silage of high digestibility (>80%) can be made from highly digestible herbage; however the intakes, both of dry matter and of digestible dry matter, from such silages were found to be much lower than expected. If the potential for animal production of high digestibility in silage is to be exploited, intakes must be in-creased; two possible measures, viz. the wilting of herbage before ensilage, and the use of high-digestibility forages of high soluble carbohydrate contents, are discussed.     

Effect of harvesting system on nutrient losses during silage making. 2. In-silo losses

Nutrient losses during the in-silo period were determined following the ensiling of grass using three differing harvesting systems. The treatments were either (a) harvesting herbage directly by means of a flail harvester (unwilted flail, UF) or (b) pre-mowing of herbage with a rotary drum mower and lifting using a precision chop forage harvester with wilting (WP) and without wilting (UP). Herbage was harvested and ensiled over the period 26–29 May 1982, and a good fermentation was achieved with all three silages. Losses of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) and crude protein (CP) during the in-silo period were greatest with the UF system, intermediate with the UP system and lowest with the WP system. Gross energy losses followed the same trend with losses (as a percentage of ensiled levels) of 18·6, 9·8 and 4·4% for the UF, UP and WP systems, respectively. Gross energy loss as effluent accounted for 24% and 22% of total gross energy ensiled for the UF and UP treatments. Patterns of effluent flow differed between the two unwilted silages with a higher peak flow rate with the UF material. Total effluent production at 354 ml (kg DM ensiled)^-1 was greater for the UF material than for the UP material (288 ml (kg DM ensiled)^-1). Nutrient loss through surface waste was similar for all three silages whereas gross energy losses arising through residual respiration, fermentation and gaseous loss amounted to 149%, 6·7% and 31% of that ensiled for the UF, UP and WP silages, respectively. The results of this study, taken in conjunction with those of an earlier study where field losses were assessed, indicate that recovery of gross energy during silage making was very similar for the UP and WP systems and only marginally greater than that recovered with the UF system.