冻融条件下土壤侵蚀阻力影响因素

为揭示季节性冻融区土壤侵蚀阻力的变化机制，确定影响土壤侵蚀阻力主控因子，通过室内冻融模拟、水槽冲刷和土壤抗剪试验，对黄绵土(SM粉质壤土)、风沙土(WS砂壤土)和黑土(KS黏壤土)侵蚀阻力影响因素进行研究。结果表明：(1)随着冻融循环次数增加，细沟可蚀性值逐渐升高，而临界剪切力降低。经历10次冻融循环后，SM粉质壤土、WS砂壤土和KS黏壤土的细沟可蚀性分别增加76%,63%,11%,临界剪切力分别减小37%,13%,91%。(2)细沟可蚀性随土壤抗剪强度、黏聚力和内摩擦角增大而减小，临界剪切力则呈相反趋势。与内摩擦角相比，黏聚力更适合用来表征土壤侵蚀阻力。采用黏聚力对SM粉质壤土、WS砂壤土和KS黏壤土的细沟可蚀性进行预测，决定系数(R²)分别为0.42,0.78,0.50,平均为0.57;对临界剪切力的预测效果较差，决定系数(R²)分别为0.16,0.14,0.18,平均仅为0.16。(3)根据皮尔逊相关分析结果，基于土壤的初始含水率、冻融循环次数、力学特性以及土壤参数等分别建立细沟可蚀性(R²=0.85)和临界剪切力...     

西南干暖河谷土壤细沟可蚀性垂直地带性差异

为探究以干暖河谷为基带的西南山地土壤细沟可蚀性垂直地带性差异,选择该区不同垂直带典型土地利用类型(林草地和耕地)下不同土壤类型(红壤、黄壤、棕壤和暗棕壤)为研究对象,利用室内“V”形细沟模拟装置,分别进行6种流量(150,300,450,600,750,900mL/min)和3种水文状态(排水状态、饱和状态和渗流状态)的模拟冲刷试验。结果表明:(1)该区土壤颗粒组成无明显的垂直地带性,林草地的砂粒含量偏高,各土壤的颗粒含量差异在9%以内,所有土壤均为粉质壤土,但有机质差异较大,且随着海拔增加而增加;(2)土壤的细沟可蚀性具有明显的垂直地带性,随海拔升高,林草地土壤可蚀性Kr值逐渐减小,相比于红壤,暗棕壤的Kr值减小幅度平均为47.74%,耕地土壤中黄壤略大于红壤,可能与人为活动强度和土壤熟化程度有关;(3)不同土地利用方式下,林草地土壤Kr值显著大于耕地土壤Kr值,平均增幅为22.63%,这可能与有机质促进土壤抗侵蚀性能的提高有关;(4)不同近地表水文状态下,土壤的细沟可蚀性表现为渗流状态>饱和状态>排水状态,表明随着近地表水文状态变化,尤其是垂直水力梯度的增加会显著导致土壤的细沟可蚀性增大;试验还发现,土壤的临界剪切力仅在不同的水文状态下具有渗流状态>饱和状态>排水状态的规律性,而在不同海拔和土地利用类型之间没有明显的规律性。     

基于CT扫描技术的土柱孔隙结构及其抗侵蚀能力研究——以种植百喜草为例

[目的]分析百喜草土柱孔隙结构与土壤抗侵蚀能力之间的联系,为水土保持植物措施的优化布设以及效益评估提供科学依据。[方法]依托植物土柱长期微区试验,通过CT扫描技术研究种植百喜草的土柱孔隙指标(孔隙长度密度、体积密度、表面积密度和孔隙数密度),开展边坡水槽冲刷试验。设置3个坡度(10°,20°和30°)和5个流量(0.8,1.6,2.4,3.2,4.0 L/s)组合量化土壤抗侵蚀能力,分析孔隙指标与抗侵蚀能力因子之间的关系。[结果]百喜草土柱孔隙发育程度随生长时间不断增强,而随土层深度减弱;4个孔隙结构指标在0—5 cm土层的数值远大于5—10 cm土层,且表层0—5 cm的平均土壤细沟可蚀性(0.026 s/m)和临界水流剪切力(7.0 Pa)分别是下层5—10 cm的0.33,1.54倍。[结论]植物根系发育的孔隙指标能够表征土壤抗侵蚀能力变化,CT扫描获取的4个孔隙结构指标与细沟可蚀性等因子显著相关,其中孔隙表面积密度与土壤抗侵蚀能力指标关系最为密切。     

水力梯度影响下WEPP模型估计细沟侵蚀参数的可行性分析

为分析近地表水文条件影响下WEPP(Water Erosion Prediction Project)模型估计细沟可蚀性和临界剪切力的可行性,该研究选取长江中上游地区典型黄壤为研究对象,采用不同水力梯度值模拟饱和/渗流(水力梯度为0、0.71和1.43 m/m)和排水(水力梯度为?0.71和?1.43 m/m)2种近地表水文条件,并设置3个放水流量(0.55、1.58、2.51 L/min),利用"V"形试验土槽测定不同条件下细沟产流产沙,以WEPP模型估算的土壤可蚀性和临界剪切力为计算值。测定增大流量直到侵蚀开始并出现连续不断的土壤颗粒分离时所对应的流量,将基于此流量计算获得的临界剪切力作为实测值。比较临界剪切力计算值与实测值验证WEPP模型估算的可靠性。结果表明,在饱和/渗流条件下,土壤剥蚀率随着冲刷历时的增加逐渐减小;在排水条件下,放水流量为0.55 L/min的土壤剥蚀率随冲刷历时的增加快速减少并逐步稳定,而随着放水流量增大土壤剥蚀率波动的更为剧烈。5个水力梯度平均细沟可蚀性为2.51×10?2 s/m。饱和/渗流条件下细沟可蚀性为3.07×10?2 s/m,是排水条件的1.78倍。除水力梯度为?1.43 m/m时临界剪切力在WEPP模型中的计算值与实测值相符外,在?0.71~1.43 m/m范围内,临界剪切力的计算值均高估了实测值,平均高估了36.85%。临界剪切力实测值与计算值呈指数函数关系(R2=0.77,P0.01)。该研究可为黄壤的侵蚀防治及WEPP细沟侵蚀模型临界剪切力修正提供理论支持和科学指导。     

饱和状态下黄绵土坡面细沟侵蚀可蚀性和临界剪切应力特征

土壤可蚀性参数和临界剪切应力是评价土壤易侵蚀程度和抗水流剪切变形能力的重要指标,目前在黄绵土坡面细沟侵蚀过程中,土壤饱和条件下可蚀性参数和临界剪切应力的变化尚不明确。该研究采用室内土槽模拟冲刷试验确定不同坡度（5°、10°、15°、20°）和流量（2、4、8 L/min）下饱和黄绵土坡面的最大细沟剥蚀率,基于数值法、修正数值法和解析法计算土壤可蚀性参数和临界剪切应力。结果表明,3种方法所得最大细沟剥蚀率均随坡度和流量增加而增大,其中修正数值法和解析法计算的最大细沟剥蚀率更接近。土壤可蚀性参数分别是0.485、0.283和0.268 s/m,土壤临界剪切应力分别为1.225、1.244和1.381 N/m2。修正数值法可提高数值法近似计算的精度,使近似计算结果更接近解析法计算获得的理论值。饱和较未饱和黄绵土的土壤可蚀性参数略有减小（16.83%）,而临界剪切应力减小了66.97%,表明土壤饱和对黄绵土土壤可蚀性参数影响很小,但大幅度削弱了土壤临界剪切应力,使得黄绵土坡面饱和后土壤侵蚀更为强烈。此外,饱和黄绵土边坡的临界剪切应力比饱和紫色土坡面大6.38%,而细沟可蚀性参数大2.35倍,表明土壤饱和对2种土壤临界剪切应力影响程度相似,但黄绵土较紫色土对土壤侵蚀的敏感性更高。研究结果可为饱和状态下不同土壤坡面细沟侵蚀模型参数的优化提供参考。     

土壤可蚀性在WEPP模型中的应用

影响土壤侵蚀过程的关键因素是侵蚀力和土壤可蚀性。土壤可蚀性是定量计算土壤流失的重要指标和土壤侵蚀预报模型中的必要参数。WEPP是由美国农业部开发的新一代水蚀预测模型 ,该模型以土壤可蚀性为必要参数 ,并将其分解为细沟间可蚀性 (Ki)、细沟可蚀性 (Kr)和临界剪切力 (τc)来预报流域径流形成与土壤侵蚀过程     

黑土区治理后侵蚀沟道融雪侵蚀观测研究

融雪侵蚀是季节性积雪区水土流失的重要组成部分,融雪作用对侵蚀沟发育的影响对侵蚀沟防治有重要意义。通过野外实地监测和测量,对东北黑土区治理后侵蚀沟融雪侵蚀过程及沟坡细沟形态特征进行分析,探讨水土保持措施对融雪侵蚀的防控效果。结果表明:除侵蚀沟G2未产流外,侵蚀沟G1和G3在融雪中期径流率和泥沙含量明显高于融雪末期和融雪初期。融雪径流率和泥沙含量的日动态变化过程均呈先增加后下降的趋势。融雪期3条侵蚀沟沟坡细沟平均宽度变幅为6.7~9.4cm,平均深度变幅为3.3~4.3cm。阳坡出现细沟的条数,细沟密度,细沟割裂度,平均细沟复杂度和细沟侵蚀平均深度明显高于阴坡,说明阳坡的破碎程度及细沟侵蚀程度大于阴坡。细沟主要以宽浅槽型为主,宽深比为1.91~2.18。水土保持措施在融雪期间作用明显,侵蚀沟G2水土保持措施的拦水拦沙效果达到100%,侵蚀沟G1和G3大部分融雪侵蚀的泥沙也在沟道内沉积。     

降雨强度和细沟间土壤侵蚀与坡度比之间的关系

降雨强度(I)、前期含水量及坡度影响着细沟间的土壤流。失该项研完的目的是①验证细沟间土壤流失是I~2的函数之假设;②确定前期含水量对细沟间两个不同坡度可蚀性因子(K_i)的影响;③评价WEPP所用的坡度因子;④评价把雨强、流量和坡度之积作为可能的细沟间侵蚀模型。     

黄土高原不同退耕年限刺槐林地土壤侵蚀阻力

为了明确黄土高原植被恢复后不断蓄积的枯落物对土壤分离过程的影响,论文选取10、15、20、30、40a退耕年限刺槐林样地及对照样地,采集180个土壤样品用于土壤分离试验,在6组侵蚀动力条件下进行变坡水槽冲刷试验,结果表明:随着退耕年限的增大,刺槐林土壤结构趋于稳定且疏松多孔,40年刺槐林地与对照样地相比:容重降低12.9%、总孔隙度增加10.1%、毛管孔隙度增加62.4%,土壤有机质含量增加97.9%、水稳性团聚体增加112.3%.土壤分离能力均值随着林龄呈指数函数递减(R2=0.82、P<0.05).在退耕0~40年范围内,在0~15 a内土壤分离能力下降迅速,对照、10 a刺槐林地、15年刺槐林地之间的土壤分离能力差异显著(P<0.05),退耕15 a以后土壤分离能力趋于稳定.40 a林龄刺槐林细沟可蚀性比对照的细沟可蚀性降低86.3%,临界剪切力提高10.1%.土壤临界剪切力变化范围在4.15~4.78 Pa之间.细沟可蚀性的变化趋势与土壤分离能力变化趋势相似,相比临界剪切力的变化,细沟可蚀性的变化更能反映土壤分离能力的变化情况.     

降雨和径流条件下红壤坡面细沟侵蚀过程

为明确第四纪黏土发育红壤坡面侵蚀过程特征,采用人工模拟降雨和径流冲刷相结合试验,研究坡度、流量和降雨因素对坡面细沟侵蚀过程影响。结果表明:1)坡面侵蚀过程呈现明显阶段性,试验条件下侵蚀前3 min为层状面蚀为主的初始阶段,细沟出现后转变为细沟侵蚀为主的细沟发育阶段。降雨以及增加坡度和流量能加快细沟发育速度和侵蚀速率;2)各侵蚀阶段平均侵蚀速率关系为初始阶段细沟发育阶段细沟稳定阶段。初始阶段侵蚀速率对各水动力学参数响应关系为水流功率坡度水流剪切力单位水流功率=流速流量。细沟发育阶段平均侵蚀速率与水流功率、水流剪切力和坡度关系密切,而细沟稳定阶段侵蚀速率只与坡度和流量相关;3)水流功率是与初始阶段和细沟发育阶段关系最密切的水动力学参数,侵蚀初始阶段的层状面蚀、单独径流冲刷和降雨-径流作用下细沟侵蚀发生的临界水流功率分别为0.091、0.121、?1.691 N/(m·s)。试验在小尺度条件下初步揭示了红壤坡面细沟侵蚀过程特征,为南方红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀预报模型和侵蚀防治提供理论参考。     

A rational method for estimating erodibility and critical shear stress of an eroding rill

Soil erodibility and critical shear stress are two of the most important parameters for physically-based soil erosion modeling. To aid in future soil erosion modeling, a rational method for determining the soil erodibility and critical shear stress of rill erosion under concentrated flow is advanced in this paper. The method suggests that a well-defined rill be used for shear stress estimation while infinite short rill lengths be used for determination of detachment capacity. The derivative of the functional relationship between sediment yield and rill length at the inlet of rill flow, as opposed to average detachment rate of a long rill, was used for the determination of detachment capacity. Soil erodibility and critical shear stress were then regressively estimated with detachment capacity data under different flow regimes. Laboratory data of rill erosion under well defined rill channels from a loess soil was used to estimate the soil erodibility and critical shear stress. The results showed that no significant change in soil erodibility (K_r) was observed for different slope gradients ranging from 5 to 25 while critical shear stress increased slightly with the slope gradient. Soil erodibility of the loess soil was 0.3211 ± 0.001 s m^− 1. The soil erodibility and critical shear stress calculations were then compared with data from other resources to verify the feasibility of the method. Data comparison showed that the method advanced is a physically logical and feasible method to calculate the soil erodibility and critical shear stress for physically-based soil erosion models.     

Soil resistance to interrill erosion: Model parameterization and sensitivity

Interrill erosion, which is less visible in the landscape than rill and gully erosion, may cause major sediment deposits in the lower part of cultivated fields. It is often associated with runoff resulting from sealing and crusting, and soil properties such as soil detachability or soil aggregate stability have been used to express soil resistance to interrill erosion processes, i.e., interrill erodibility. From a literature review including more than fifteen erosion models, we have identified three main methods used to measure these properties: aggregate stability and splash cup detachability, methods performed in the laboratory using only a few grams of soil, and standard plot methods that are based on field plot measurements. This difference makes the parameters involved in assessing interrill erodibility dependent upon the scale and the hydrological processes involved and difficult to compare. According to the literature, the sensitivity of actual erosion models to interrill erodibility is lower than the sensitivity to hydrological properties and rill erodibility parameters. This numerical study shows that erodibility measurements from the three major assessment methods give different results regarding the contribution of interrill erosion and show that the sensitivity of erosion modeling to interrill erodibility may in fact be greater than shown in the literature on global sensitivity analysis.     

Interrill and rill erodibility in the northern Andean Highlands

There is a lack of quantitative information describing the physical processes causing soil erosion in the Andean Highlands, especially those related to interrill and rill erodibility factors. To assess how susceptible are soils to erosion in this region, field measurements of interrill (Ki) and rill (Kr) erodibility factors were evaluated. These values were compared against two equations used by the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP), and also compared against the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) erodibility factor. Ki observed in situ ranged from 1.9 to 56 × 10⁵ kg s m^− 4 whereas Kr ranged from 0.3 to 14 × 10^− 3 s m^− 1. Sand, clay, silt, very fine sand and organic matter fractions were determined in order to apply WEPP and USLE procedures. Most of the evaluated soils had low erodibility values. However, the estimated USLE K values were in the low range of erodibility values. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were applied to ascertain the influence of the independent soil parameters on the Ki and Kr values. After this, we yield two empirical equations to estimate Ki and Kr under this Andean Highlands conditions. Ki was estimated using as predictors silt and very fine sand, while Kr used as predictors clay, very fine sand and organic matter content. Relationship among Ki, Kr and K are described for the Highland Andean soils.     

土壤侵蚀物理模型中紫色土细沟侵蚀参数研究

以长江中上游典型侵蚀性土壤紫色土为研究对象,采用变坡限定性细沟土槽,研究不同流量、坡度和沟长情况下,紫色土细沟侵蚀特征,并量化了细沟侵蚀参数。结果表明:细沟侵蚀受水流水力特征、土壤性质和坡面影响,随着水流含沙量的增大,细沟侵蚀速率呈现减小趋势;流量越大,坡度越陡,细沟水流的剥蚀率越大,造成细沟侵蚀速率也越大。在5L/min的小流量下,细沟侵蚀速率受剥蚀率限制与含沙量没有出现线性关系,15,25L/min流量下,细沟侵蚀速率与含沙量呈线性相关。侵蚀速率在细沟开始处最大,随沟长的增大,水流能量消耗于挟带泥沙而迅速减小,相关性分析得到侵蚀速率与沟长呈指数递减,相关系数R2变化于0.45~0.98之间。通过回归分析得到试验条件下,紫色土细沟土壤可蚀性均值为0.005 3s/m,临界剪切力均值为2.92Pa。研究结果对于坡面土壤侵蚀物理模型的建立和推广应用提供数据支撑,为紫色土坡面侵蚀研究提供借鉴。     

Erosion processes and erodibility of cultivated soils in North Rhine‐Westphalia under artificial rain. I. Site characteristics and results of laboratory experiments

Soil erosion by water causes substantial on‐site degradation and off‐site damages in the densely populated state of North Rhine‐Westphalia (Germany). Measures of soil conservation should be adjusted to soil erodibilities and should be based on an understanding of the processes involved in water erosion including aggregate breakdown, rainsplash erosion, surface sealing, and soil loss. For a state‐wide assessment of erosion processes and erodibilities, we tested representative cultivated soils of North Rhine‐Westphalia in laboratory and field experiments with artificial rain. In the laboratory experiments described in this paper, rainsplash erosion, sealing susceptibility, and interrill erodibility of 25 topsoils filled in 0.5 m² boxes were investigated. Results of different aggregate‐stability tests correlate with organic‐matter contents but not with parameters of rainsplash or soil loss. On most soil materials, rainsplash increases or maintains constant rates in the course of the simulation runs indicating that the soil surface did not attain a higher shear resistance. High sealing susceptibilities are found for soils of quite different textures ranging from loam sand to silt clay, whereas other silt clays, clay loams, and some clay silts maintain high infiltration rates. A trend of increasing sealing susceptibility and total soil loss with increasing clay content is observed for the loam sands to sand loams. Dynamics of soil loss is largely governed by runoff rates. Total soil loss is also determined by sediment concentration in surface runoff, which is low on most clayey soils, on loam sands poor in clay, and on a sand loam, and high in the case of highly erodible clay silts, loam sands, and sand loams. The most crust prone soils are not necessarily the most erodible. On most soils, soil‐loss rates do not stabilize until the end of the rainfall experiments. For comparing the interrill erodibilities of the soils, total soil loss is preferred instead of interrill erodibility factors (K_i, K_iq) published in the literature.     

Determination of rill erodibility and critical shear stress of saturated purple soil slopes

The hydrological conditions near the soil surface influence the soil erosion process, as determined by the soil erodibility and critical shear stress. The soil erodibility and critical shear stress of saturated purple soil slopes were computed and compared with those of unsaturated purple soil slopes. The detachment capacities computed through the numerical method (NM), modified numerical method (MNM) and analytical method (AM), from rill erosion experiments on saturated purple soil slopes at different flow rates (2, 4, and 8 L min^?1) and slope gradients (5, 10, 15, and 20°), were used to comparatively compute the soil erodibility and critical shear stress. The computed soil erodibilities and critical shear stresses were also compared with those of unsaturated purple soil slopes. At the different slope gradients ranging from 5° to 20°, there were no significant differences in the soil erodibilities of the saturated purple soil and also in those of the unsaturated purple soil. The critical shear stresses slightly varied with the slope gradients. The saturated purple soil was relatively significantly more susceptible to erosion. The NM overestimated the soil erodibility of both saturated and unsaturated soils by 31% and underestimated the critical shear stress. The MNM yielded the same soil erodibility and critical shear stress values as the AM. The results of this study supply parameters for modeling rill erosion of saturated purple soil slope.