The effects of bimatoprost and unoprostone isopropyl on the intraocular pressure of normal cats

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects on intraocular pressure (IOP), pupillary diameter (PD), blepharospasm score, conjunctival injection score, and aqueous humor flare score when either 0.03% bimatoprost solution is applied once daily or 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution is applied twice daily topically to the eyes of normal cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aforementioned parameters were evaluated daily in each of 12 cats throughout the entirety of the study. During an initial 10-day treatment phase a single eye of six of the cats was treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution while a single eye of the remaining six cats was treated with buffered saline solution (BSS) once daily. During a second 10-day treatment phase a single eye of six of the cats was treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution while a single eye of the remaining six cats was treated with BSS twice daily. Contralateral eyes of all cats remained untreated at all time points. RESULTS: Blepharospasm score, conjunctival injection score, and aqueous humor flare score never rose from a value of 0, for any eye of any cat during the study. The mean +/- SD of IOP for eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution and BSS were 16.55 +/- 3.06 mmHg and 18.02 +/- 3.52 mmHg, respectively. The mean +/- of PD for eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution and BSS were 5.7 +/- 1.57 mm and 6.39 +/- 1.78 mm, respectively. The mean +/- SD of IOP for eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution and BSS were 15.7 +/- 2.91 mmHg and 17.2 +/- 2.9 mmHg, respectively. The mean +/- SD of PD for eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution and BSS were 5.8 +/- 1.43 mm and 6.9 +/- 1.37 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference (P > or = 0.05) in IOP or PD between eyes treated with 0.03% bimatoprost solution vs. eyes treated with BSS. Similarly, there was no significant difference (P > or = 0.05) in IOP or PD between eyes treated with 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution vs. eyes treated with BSS. CONCLUSION: Neither once daily topical administration of 0.03% bimatoprost solution nor twice daily topical administration of 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution significantly affect the IOP of normal cats. Both 0.03% bimatoprost solution and 0.15% unoprostone isopropyl solution induced no significant ocular side effects in normal cats when dosed over a 10-day treatment period.     

Effects of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0.005% on the intraocular pressure of normal dogs

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of travoprost 0.004% and latanoprost 0.005% on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of normal dogs. METHODS: Twenty mixed breed dogs were randomized to two groups: latanoprost was used in group A and travoprost in group B. The drugs were instilled in the right eye of the dogs, whereas the left eye received placebo. Both drugs were instilled once a day at 8 am during 5 days. IOP measurements were made at 8 am, 10 am, 2 pm and 8 pm during the 5 days of treatment, the 3 days that preceded treatment, and 3 days following treatment. Presence of blepharospasm, miosis, anterior chamber flare, and conjunctival hyperemia were evaluated during the study. RESULTS: Mean IOP was significantly reduced in the eyes treated with both latanoprost and travoprost, when compared with the eyes treated with placebo (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean IOPs of eyes treated with latanoprost and travoprost at all time intervals during baseline, treatment, and recovery (P>0.05). On the fifth day of treatment and on the first day of the recovery period, a severe ocular hypotension was noted with both drugs, resulting in imprecise readings with the tonometer. Miosis and conjunctival hyperemia were observed in the treated eyes of both groups, whereas flare was noticed in one latanoprost-treated eye. CONCLUSION: Travoprost 0.004% significantly reduces the IOP in normal dogs. The hypotensive effect obtained with travoprost 0.004% is comparable to that obtained with latanoprost 0.005%.     

Effect of single and multiple doses of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate in the glaucomatous Beagle

The objective of this study was to evaluate the changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucomatous dogs after instillations of 0.2% brimonidine once, twice and three times daily in single day studies, and after twice and three times daily for 4 days in multiple dose studies. We studied eight Beagles with inherited primary open angle glaucoma. Applanation tonometry (IOP), pupil size (PS) and heart rate (HR) measurements were obtained at 8 am, 10 am, 1 pm, 3 pm and 5 pm. The studies were divided into: eight glaucoma dogs and five of the eight dogs that demonstrated greater response to 0.2% brimonidine. Single-dose drug studies are divided into placebo (0.5% methylcellulose), 0.2% brimonidine administered once daily (8 am); twice daily (8 am and noon); and three times daily (8 am, noon and 5 pm). The 5-day multiple-dose studies included: day 1, no drug; and 4 days, 0.2% brimonidine instillations either twice daily (8 am and 2 pm) or three times daily (8 am, 2 pm and 9 pm). Statistical comparisons between drug groups included control (nondrug) and treated (placebo/0.2% brimonidine) eyes for both single- and multiple-dose studies. The mean +/- SEM diurnal decrease in IOP in the eight glaucomatous Beagles for the control and placebo eyes were 3.4 +/- 4.7 and 5.4 +/- 2.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean +/- SEM diurnal decrease in IOP after 0.2% brimonidine once, twice and three times daily was 6.4 +/- 3.5, 8.0 +/- 6.1 and 9.8 +/- 8.1 mmHg, respectively; this trend was not significant statistically. Significant miosis occurred starting 2 h postinstillations, and the resultant mean +/- SD pupil size was 2.7 +/- 0.3 mm. A significant decrease in heart rate also occurred (12%). In the five most responsive dogs the changes in PS and HR during these studies were similar to the larger group, but significant decreases in IOP occurred at most measurement times. In the multiple-dose study with 0.2% brimonidine twice daily the mean +/- SEM decrease in IOP for day 1 to day 4 was 5.0 +/- 1.3, 5.7 +/- 1.3, 1.4 +/- 3.3 and 4.9 +/- 1.3 mmHg, respectively. When 0.2% brimonidine was instilled three times daily the mean +/- SEM diurnal IOP decrease was from day 1 to day 4 and was 0.75 +/- 1.3, 2.4 +/- 1.5, 1.2 +/- 2.7 and 1.4 +/- 1.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean change in pupil diameter was 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm. Decrease in HR averaged 22%. In the same single-dose studies with the five most responsive dogs, PS and HR were similar, but the decreases in IOP were significant at more measurement intervals. We conclude that 0.2% brimonidine produces a decrease in IOP in dogs, a statistically significant miosis, and a reduced heart rate (12-22%). However, because of the limited drug-induced ocular hypotension, brimonidine should be combined with other drugs when used for the glaucomas in the dog.     

Effect of topical 1% atropine sulfate on intraocular pressure in normal horses

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of topical 1% ophthalmic atropine sulfate on intraocular pressure (IOP) in ocular normotensive horses. Animals Studied Eleven clinically healthy horses. Procedures IOP was measured bilaterally twice daily, at 8 AM and 4 PM, for 5 days. No medication was applied for the first 2 days of the study. Thereafter, one eye of each horse was treated with 0.1 mL of topical 1% atropine sulfate ointment twice daily (7 AM and 7 PM) for 3 days. The contralateral eye served as a control. In eight of the horses, an additional IOP reading was taken 3 days following cessation of the atropine treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the IOP of control vs. treatment eyes in the pretreatment period, days 1 and 2 (P = 0.97 and 0.55, respectively). During the treatment period, treated eyes of 10 of the horses had significantly lower IOP than control eyes (P = 0.03). The mean IOP reduction in treated eyes, relative to untreated eyes, was 11.2%. One horse had a significant rise in IOP in the treated eye compared to the remaining study animals. The IOP of control eyes did not vary significantly over the observation period (P = 0.27). There was no significant variation in IOP between the 8 AM and 4 PM measurement (P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: Topical 1% atropine sulfate causes a small, but significant decline in IOP in most ocular normotensive horses. Because topical atropine may elevate IOP in some horses, it should be used with caution in the treatment of glaucoma in this species.     

Effect of topical 0.03% flurbiprofen and 0.005% latanoprost, alone and in combination, on normal canine eyes

Objective Evaluate the influence of topically applied flurbiprofen 0.03% and latanoprost 0.005%, alone or in combination, in normal canines. Animals studied 10 Normal Beagles. Procedures Intraocular pressure (IOP), pupil size, aqueous flare, conjunctival hyperemia, and blepharospasm were evaluated bilaterally five times daily (8 am , 11 am , 2 pm , 5 pm, and 8 pm ). The study consisted of a training and acclimation period, followed by 3, 1‐week experiment periods. A 2‐week washout period occurred between each experiment period. During period 1, all dogs received flurbiprofen (three doses 6‐h apart) in the treated eye, whereas in period 2, all dogs received latanoprost (one dose 24‐h apart). During period 3, both latanoprost (one dose 24‐h apart) and flurbiprofen (three doses 6‐h apart) were administered in the treated eye. Results Flurbiprofen resulted in a mean IOP elevation of 1.1 mmHg (8.65%) in the treated eye, as compared with the control eye. No effect on pupil size, conjunctival hyperemia, or aqueous flare was noted. Latanoprost resulted in a mean IOP reduction of 3.4 mmHg (30.19%). Combined latanoprost and flurbiprofen resulted in a mean IOP reduction of 2.7 mmHg (24.56%). Miosis was noted in the treated eyes during both latanoprost periods, with maximal pupil constriction 3‐h post‐dose. This was followed by relative mydriasis 24‐h post‐dose, persisting 48 h after the last dose. The degree of conjunctival hyperemia varied between individuals. Neither blepharospasm nor aqueous flare was noted at any time point. Conclusion Concurrent administration of latanoprost and flurbiprofen resulted in a 20.41% reduction in the ocular hypotensive effect relative to latanoprost therapy alone.     

Changes in intraocular pressure associated with topical dorzolamide and oral methazolamide in glaucomatous dogs

Objective To compare the reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) by topical 2% dorzolamide to oral methazolamide (5 mg/kg) in dogs, and determine if the combination of both drugs would reduce IOP more than either drug administered alone. Animals studied Thirteen glaucomatous beagles. Procedures Measurements, including applanation tonometry, pupil size and heart rate, were obtained at 8 am, 12 noon, and 5 pm on days 1, 3 and 5. The 5‐day drug studies included placebo (0.5% methylcellulose); 2% dorzolamide administered in one eye twice daily (8 am and 5 pm), and repeated again in one eye three times (8 am, 12 noon and 5 pm) daily; methazolamide (5 mg/kg per os administered at 8 am and 5 pm); 2% dorzolamide instilled twice daily (5 days) combined with oral methazolamide on the last 3 days, and methazolamide (5 days) combined with 2% dorzolamide on the last 3 days and instilled twice daily. Statistical comparisons between drug groups included control (nondrug) eye and treated (placebo/drug) eyes for days 1, day 3 and 5. Results Topical 2% dorzolamide, administered twice and three times daily, significantly decreased IOP (mean ± SEM) in glaucomatous dogs on the first day (twice daily 7.6 ± 2.4 mmHg, and three times daily 16.4 ± 3.6 mmHg) that was even greater by day 5 (twice daily 10.4 ± 2.0 mmHg, and three times daily 13.9 ± 2.7). Oral methazolamide also significantly lowered IOP in both eyes. Oral methazolamide (administered from day 1 through to day 5) combined with 2% topical dorzolamide (instilled in the drug eye for day 3 through to day 5) also significantly lowered IOP of both eyes for all days, and for day 5 the mean ± SEM IOP was decreased by 7.9 ± 1.7 mmHg (methazolamide plus dorzolamide) and 7.5 ± 2.6 mmHg (methazolamide only). Topical dorzolamide (instilled in the drug eye for day 1 through to day 5) combined with oral methazolamide (administered from day 3 through to day 5) significantly lowered IOP in the drug eye on day 1 (5 pm: 9.6 ± 1.9 mmHg), for day 3 (11 am and 5 pm) and for all of day 5 for both eyes (5 pm: control eye 9.5 ± 1.8 mmHg; drug eye 9.2 ± 1.9 mmHg). Topical dorzolamide (2%) instilled three times daily produces similar IOP declines compared to the combination of oral methazolamide and 2% dorzolamide administered twice daily. Conclusions Dorzolamide (2%) instilled twice or three times daily causes significant decreases in IOP in glaucomatous dogs. Twice daily instillations caused progressive declines in IOP from day 1 to day 5. Dorzolamide (2%) combined with oral methazolamide (5 mg/kg per os twice daily) produces similar but not additional declines in IOP.     

Effects of 0.005% latanoprost solution on intraocular pressure in healthy dogs and cats

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of daily topical ocular administration of latanoprost solution on intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy cats and dogs. ANIMALS: 9 domestic shorthair cats and 14 dogs. PROCEDURE: Latanoprost solution (0.005%) was administered topically to 1 eye (treated) and vehicle to the other eye (control) of all animals once daily in the morning for 8 days. Intraocular pressure was measured twice daily for the 5 days preceding treatment, and IOP, pupillary diameter, conjunctival hyperemia, and blepharospasm were measured 0, 1, 6, and 12 hours after the first 4 treatments and 0 and 12 hours after the final 4 treatments. Measurements continued twice a day for 5 days after treatment was discontinued. Aqueous flare was measured once daily during and for 5 days after the treatment period. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure and pupillary diameter were significantly decreased in the treated eye of dogs, compared with the control eye. Mild conjunctival hyperemia was also detected, but severity did not differ significantly between eyes. Blepharospasm and aqueous flare were not detected in either eye. Intraocular pressure in cats was not significantly affected by treatment with latanoprost. However, pupillary diameter was significantly decreased in the treated eye, compared with the control eye. Conjunctival hyperemia, aqueous flare, and blepharospasm were not detected in either eye. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Once-daily topical ocular administration of latanoprost solution (0.005%) reduced IOP in healthy dogs without inducing adverse effects but did not affect IOP in healthy cats. Latanoprost may be useful for treating glaucoma in dogs.     

Effect of different dose schedules of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and pupil size in the glaucomatous Beagle

Objective To evaluate the changes in intraocular pressure and pupil size in glaucomatous dogs after instillation of 0.005% latanoprost (Xalatan, Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) once in the morning, or once in the evening, or twice daily in five‐day multiple‐dose studies. Animals studied Eight Beagles with the moderate stage of inherited primary open‐angle glaucoma. Procedures Applanation tonometry (IOP) and pupil size (PS) measurements were obtained at 8 am, 10 am, 12 noon, 2 pm, and 4 pm in eight glaucoma dogs. Methylcellulose (0.5% as placebo) was instilled in the control eye, and 0.005% latanoprost was instilled in the opposite drug eye. Control and drug eyes were selected using a random table. For these three studies, 0.5% methylcellulose and 0.005% latanoprost were instilled the second through the fifth days with instillations in the morning (8.30 am), or evening (8 pm), or twice daily (8.30 am and 8 pm). Statistical comparisons between drug groups included control, placebo, and treated (0.005% latanoprost) eyes for three multiple‐dose studies. Results In the 8‐am latanoprost study, the mean ± SEM diurnal declines in IOP for the placebo and drug eyes for the first day were 6.5 ± 3.6 mmHg and 8.4 ± 4.0 mmHg, respectively. The mean ± SEM diurnal changes in IOP after 0.005% latanoprost at 8 am once daily for the next four days were 23.3 ± 5.0 mmHg, 25.4 ± 2.1 mmHg, 25.7 ± 1.7 mmHg, and 26.1 ± 1.7 mmHg, respectively, and were significantly different from the control eye. A significant miosis also occurred starting 2 h postdrug instillation, and the resultant mean ± SD pupil size was 1.0 ± 0.1 mm. In the first day of the second latanoprost study, the mean ± SEM diurnal changes in the placebo and drug eye IOPs were 11.6 ± 3.8 mmHg, and 12.0 ± 4.4 mmHg, respectively. For the following four days with latanoprost instilled at 8 pm, the mean ± SEM diurnal changes in IOP in the drug eyes were 24.9 ± 2.1 mmHg, 22.4 ± 1.8 mmHg, 21.6 ± 1.9 mmHg, and 26.6 ± 2.2 mmHg, respectively. Compared to the fellow placebo eyes, the diurnal changes in IOP were significantly different. Significant changes in pupil size were similar to the IOP changes, with miosis throughout the day and return to baseline pupil size the following morning before drug instillation. In the last study, the mean ± SEM diurnal changes in IOP for the placebo and drug eyes for the first day were 6.6 ± 2.1 mmHg and 9.4 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. For the four subsequent days with latanoprost instilled twice daily, the mean ± SEM diurnal IOP changes were 19.6 ± 1.5 mmHg, 19.1 ± 1.4 mmHg, 19.9 ± 1.7 mmHg, and 20.3 ± 0.7 mmHg, respectively, and were significantly different from the placebo eyes. The mean changes in PS were 3.1 ± 0.7 mm. Conclusion 0.005% latanoprost instilled once daily (am or pm) as well as twice daily produces significant decreases in IOP and PS in the glaucomatous Beagle. The evening instillation of 0.005% latanoprost produced less daily fluctuations in IOP than when the drug was instilled in the morning. 0.005% latanoprost instilled twice daily produced the greatest decline in IOP with the least daily fluctuations, but longer duration miosis.     

The effect of dorzolamide 2% on circadian intraocular pressure in cats with primary congenital glaucoma

Objective To determine the extent of fluctuation in circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) and the efficacy of topical dorzolamide 2% q 8 h in lowering IOP and blunting circadian fluctuation in IOP in glaucomatous cats. Animals studied Seven adult cats with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). Procedures Measurements of IOP and pupil diameter were obtained for both eyes (OU) of each cat q 4 h for 12 days. Cats were housed in a laboratory animal facility with a 12‐h light:dark cycle. Baseline values were established for 2 days. For the next 5 days, placebo (1.4% polyvinyl alcohol) was administered OU q 8 h. Dorzolamide 2% was then administered OU q 8 h for a further 5 days. A multivariate mixed linear model was fitted to the data, with parameters estimated from a Bayesian perspective. The 4 am time point was selected as the reference for the purposes of comparisons. Results Estimated mean IOP for the reference time point pre‐treatment was symmetric (about 33 mmHg OU). In all cats, IOP was significantly lower during the diurnal phase, relative to the 4 am measurements, with highest IOP observed 2–6 h after the onset of the dark phase. Circadian fluctuations in IOP were dampened during the treatment period. There was a significant decrease in IOP in all cats during the dorzolamide treatment period (estimated mean for the treatment period reference = 17.9 mmHg OU). Conclusions Topical dorzolamide 2% q 8 h is effective in reducing IOP and IOP fluctuation in cats with PCG.     

Effect of topical ophthalmic application of cidofovir on experimentally induced primary ocular feline herpesvirus-1 infection in cats

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of twice-daily ophthalmic application of 0.5% cidofovir solution in cats with experimentally induced primary ocular feline herpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) infection. ANIMALS: Twelve 6-month-old sexually intact male cats. PROCEDURES: Cats were randomly assigned to either a treatment or control group. Ocular infection with FHV-1 was induced (day 0) in all cats via inoculation of both eyes with 10(4) plaque-forming units of a plaque-purified FHV-1 field strain. Twice daily for 10 days beginning on day 4 after virus inoculation, the treatment group received 1 drop of 0.5% cidofovir in 1% carboxymethylcellulose in both eyes, and the control group received 1 drop of 1% carboxymethylcellulose in both eyes. A standardized scoring method was used to evaluate clinical signs of FHV-1 infection in each cat once daily for 24 days. The amount of ocular viral shedding was assessed by use of a quantitative real-time PCR procedure every 3 days during the study period. Clinical scores and viral quantification were averaged over the pretreatment (days 0 to 3), treatment (days 4 to 14), and posttreatment (days 15 to 24) periods for each cat. RESULTS: During the treatment period, clinical scores and amount of viral ocular shedding were significantly lower in the treatment group, compared with findings in the control group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Twice-daily application of 0.5% cidofovir solution in both eyes significantly decreased the amount of viral shedding and the severity of clinical disease in cats with experimentally induced ocular FHV-1 infection.     

Effects of topical administration of 1% brinzolamide on normal cat eyes

Objective To evaluate the effect of short‐term daily topical administration of 1% brinzolamide on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of healthy domestic cats with normotensive eyes and to assess the potential for negative side effects of drug administration. Animals Twelve privately owned adult domestic cats without physical or ocular abnormalities. Procedure Normal variation in IOP was determined on day 1. Cats were then treated on days 2–8 with a topical placebo (artificial tear solution) OU q 12 h. On days 9–15 the cats were treated q 12 h with 1% brinzolamide in one randomly selected eye and the placebo in the contralateral eye. All medications (drug and placebo) were administered twice daily at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. On days 16–22 the cats received no topical medications. IOP, horizontal pupil size in mm and assessment of conjunctival hyperemia were noted OU on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 at 5 time points (9 a.m., 11 a.m., 1 p.m., 3 p.m. and 5 p.m.). Mixed linear regression models were used to compare the IOP of each eye at all time periods for each cat, controlling for age and weight. Results Mean IOP was not significantly altered in any eye at any time point during the treatment period compared with pretreatment, baseline, or follow‐up evaluations. Conjunctival hyperemia and miosis were not detected in either eye at any time point. Conclusions and clinical relevance Short‐term q 12 h administration of 1% brinzolamide did not significantly reduce IOP in this small sample population of normotensive cats under these study conditions. No clinically relevant side effects were noted with brinzolamide administration.     

Effects of mydriatics on intraocular pressure and pupil size in the normal feline eye

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of various mydriatics (1% atropine, 1% cyclopentolate, 0.5% tropicamide, 10% phenylephrine) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and pupil size (PS) in normal cats. ANIMALS STUDIED: The mydriatics were tested in 10 adult ophthalmoscopically normal European Domestic Short-haired cats. Procedure Single-dose drug studies were divided into placebo (vehicle of phenylephrine), 10% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide, 1% cyclopentolate and 1% atropine. After measurement of IOP and pupil size (PS) at 8 a.m. on the first day, one drop of the tested drug was applied to one randomly selected eye. The IOP and PS were measured for a minimum of 36 h until the pupil returned to pretest size. RESULTS: Ten per cent phenylephrine had no significant effect on IOP, and the effect on the pupil size was minimal (相似文献   

Intraocular pressure measurements obtained as part of a comprehensive geriatric health examination from cats seven years of age or older.

OBJECTIVE: To determine intraocular pressure (IOP) in cats > or = 7 years of age undergoing a routine comprehensive geriatric health examination. DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: 538 cats (1,068 eyes). PROCEDURE: IOP was measured by applanation tonometry following instillation of 0.5% proparacaine. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD IOP for all eyes was 12.3 +/- 4.0 mm Hg (range, 4 to 31 mm Hg). Mean age was 12.3 +/- 2.9 years. Intraocular pressure did not vary significantly cross-sectionally with age. However, in 78 cats, IOP was measured more than once, and follow-up measurements were significantly less than initial measurements (mean time between measurements, 9.4 +/- 3.0 months). The most useful tonometric criteria for identifying ocular abnormalities on the basis of IOP was an IOP > or = 25 mm Hg (mean + 3 SD) or a difference in IOP between eyes > or = 12 mm Hg. Eight cats met these criteria, and 5 of these cats had ophthalmic abnormalities. Low IOP was a nonspecific indicator of the presence of ocular abnormalities, as 111 cats had an IOP < or = 8 mm Hg, but only 2 had uveitis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that IOP measurements can be a useful addition to a comprehensive geriatric health examination in cats > or = 7 years of age, especially when combined with an ophthalmic examination. Cats without ocular abnormalities that have lOP > or = 25 mm Hg or a > or = 12 mm Hg difference in IOP between eyes should have tonometry repeated or be referred to an ophthalmologist for further evaluation before beginning antiglaucoma treatment.     

Time-specific intraocular pressure curves in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with laser-induced ocular hypertension

Objective To detect and categorize time‐specific variations in daytime intraocular pressure (IOP) found in Rhesus monkeys with laser‐induced ocular hypertension. Procedures Ten male monkeys with argon laser‐induced ocular hypertension in one eye were anesthetized with ketamine hydrochloride, and the IOP measured in both eyes at 7 a.m., 7.30 a.m., and then hourly until 1 p.m. with a Tonopen? XL applanation tonometer. Intraocular pressure time profiles for both eyes in each animal were developed. The means ± SD of the IOPs for both eyes were calculated for the whole 6‐h study period, and the values compared statistically. The difference between the lasered eye mean IOP standard deviation and the normal eye mean IOP standard deviation for each animal during the 6‐h follow‐up was also calculated and compared. Results Mean IOP (± SD) in the glaucoma and normal eyes for the 10 animals during the 6‐h study was 32.6 ± 2.5 and 14.9 ± 2.5 mmHg, respectively. The IOP was significantly higher in the experimental eye than in the normal eye (P = 0.0008). The mean IOP in the lasered eye did not significantly change during the study period, whereas a slight but significant increase in IOP of the normal eye over the study period was recorded (P = 0.003). The variance in IOP in the hypertensive eyes was considerably greater than that in the untreated control eyes. From 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. the IOP declined in five eyes and increased in the other five eyes with laser‐induced ocular hypertension. Conclusions The time‐specific IOP variation pattern in the daytime in the laser treated eyes is significantly greater than the variation in the normotensive eyes. This shows that in order to detect statistical differences between IOP variations induced by an IOP‐reducing drug, and the exaggerated spontaneous IOP variations present in the laser‐induced hypertensive eye, sufficient animals should be included in any study. Understanding the time‐specific IOP variation present in a group of monkeys with laser‐induced ocular hypertension is essential prior to using the model for the evaluation of IOP‐reducing drugs.     

Effects of topical 0.5% tropicamide on intraocular pressure in normal cats

The objective of the study was to determine the effect of topical 0.5% tropicamide on intraocular pressure (IOP) in normotensive feline eyes. IOP was measured bilaterally in 70 clinically healthy cats and gonioscopy (and goniophotography) was performed. Thereafter, 50 cats were treated unilaterally with one drop of 0.5% tropicamide. The contralateral, left eye served as a control. In the placebo group consisting of 20 cats, one drop of physiologic saline solution was administered to the right eye. In all cats, IOP of both eyes was measured 30, 60 and 90 min after topical administration. After unilateral tropicamide application, IOP increased significantly both in the right and in the left eye. Maximum average IOP increase was observed at the control measurement performed 90 min after treatment, with an elevation of 3.8 +/- 4.2 mmHg in the right eye and 3.5 +/- 3.6 mmHg in the left eye. Maximum IOP increase after treatment was 18.0 mmHg in the treated eye and 17.0 mmHg in the left eye. Measurements made at 60 min after treatment revealed a significantly higher increase in IOP in the right eye as compared to the left eye (P60 < 0.05), whereas the differences between right and left eye in IOP increase were not significant at 30 and 90 min after mydriatic application (P30 = 0.123; P90 = 0.305). Although tropicamide-induced mydriasis was observed in the treated eye, the contralateral eye did not show any changes in pupillary function at any time. With increasing age of the cats, IOP increase was found to be more moderate, whereas the gender of the cats did not have any significant influence on IOP changes. In the 20 cats in the placebo group, no significant changes in IOP were observed. We conclude that topical 0.5% tropicamide causes a significant elevation of IOP in the treated and untreated eye in normal cats.     

Effect of Coherin™ on intraocular pressure,pupil size and heart rate in the glaucomatous Beagle: a pilot study

Objective To evaluate effects of Coherin? on intraocular pressure (IOP), pupil size (PS), and heart rate (HR) in glaucomatous Beagles in single‐dose studies in a pilot study. Materials and methods Intraocular pressure, PS, and HR were measured in eight glaucomatous Beagles. One randomly chosen eye received single 50 μL doses of differing concentrations of Coherin? (treated eye) or vehicle (placebo‐treated eye), and the fellow eye served as the untreated control. After the first measurements, a single dose of either Coherin? or sterile water vehicle was instilled in the drug and placebo eyes, respectively. Results The mean ± SEM diurnal changes in IOP after 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.2%, 0.284%, 1%, 2%, and 4% topical Coherin? once daily were 7.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, 15.5 ± 5.3 mmHg, 11.2 ± 4.4 mmHg, 11.8 ± 4.4 mmHg, 19.1 ± 3.8 mmHg, 5.0 ± 1.8 mmHg, and 8.8 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. The declines in IOP were significantly different (P < 0.05) from the untreated control eyes with the 0.2% and 0.284% Coherin?‐treated eyes and suggestive for 1% Coherin? concentrations. No signs of irritation, significant PS, and HR changes were detected in the Coherin?‐treated eyes. Conclusion Of seven different concentrations, 2% and 0.248% Coherin? produced significant declines in IOP in the glaucomatous beagle in single‐dose studies when compared to both untreated control and placebo‐treated eyes. One percent Coherin? solution produced significant IOP decreases compared with the placebo‐treated eye but not the untreated control eyes. No local ocular irritation, PS and HR changes were observed in Coherin?‐treated eyes. This pilot study suggests that topical Coherin? has potential as an ocular hypotensive agent.     

Circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in cats

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rhythm of intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy domestic cats with no evidence of ocular disease and to analyze the influence of photoperiod, age, gender and ocular diseases on diurnal-nocturnal variations of cat IOP. ANIMALS: All animals were Domestic Short-haired cats; 30 were without systemic or ocular diseases, classified as follows: 12 male intact adult cats, five intact adult female, five adult spayed female, and eight male cats; the latter were less than 1 year of age. In addition, five adult cats with uveitis and three adult cats with secondary glaucoma were included. PROCEDURE: IOP was assessed with a Tono-Pen XL at 3-h intervals over a 24-h period in 12 healthy adult male cats kept under a photoperiod of 12-h light/12-h darkness for 2 weeks. Eight animals from the same group were then kept under constant darkness for 48 h, and IOP was measured at 3-h intervals for the following 24 h. In addition, IOP was assessed at 3 p.m. and 9 p.m. in five intact females, five spayed females, and in eight young cats, as well as in five adult cats with uveitis and three glaucomatous cats. RESULTS: Consistent, daily variations in IOP were observed in animals exposed to a light-dark cycle, with maximal values during the night. In cats exposed to constant darkness, maximal values of IOP were observed at subjective night. Differences of IOP values between 3 p.m. and 9 p.m. (diurnal-nocturnal variations) persisted in intact females, spayed females, and young animals, as well as in uveitic and glaucomatous eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate a daily rhythm of cat IOP, which appears to persist in constant darkness, suggesting some level of endogenous circadian control. In addition, daily variations of cat IOP seem to be independent of gender, age, or ocular diseases (particularly uveitis and glaucoma).     

Effect of topical administration of 2% dorzlamide hydrochloride or 2% dorzlamide hydrochloride-0.5% timolol maleate on intraocular pressure in clinically normal horses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of topical administration of 2% dorzolamide hydrochloride or 2% dorzolamide hydrochloride-0.5% timolol maleate on intraocular pressure (IOP) in clinically normal horses. ANIMALS: 18 healthy adult horses without ocular abnormalities. PROCEDURE: The IOP was measured at 5 time points (7 AM, 9 AM, 11 AM, 3 PM, 7 PM) over 11 days. On days 1 and 2, baseline values were established. On days 3 through 5, horses received 2% dorzolamide HCI (group D, n = 9) or 2% dorzolamide HCl-0.5% timolol maleate (group DT, 9) in 1 randomly assigned eye every 24 hours immediately following each daily 7 AM IOP measurement. On days 6 through 9, each drug was given every 12 hours (7 AM and 7 PM) in the treated eye. Measurements on days 10 and 11 assessed return to baseline. Mixed linear regression models compared mean IOP difference for each drug at each time period. RESULTS: Mean IOP decreased significantly in all eyes during the 2 dose/d period, compared with the baseline, 1 dose/d, and follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Administration of either drug every 24 hours for short-term treatment does not reduce IOP significantly. Administering either drug every 12 hours induced a significant reduction of IOP; however, controlling for all variables, the reduction was less than 2 mm Hg.     

Evaluation of intraocular pressure in eyes of clinically normal llamas and alpacas

OBJECTIVE: To estimate intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes of healthy camelids, using applanation tonometry. ANIMALS: The eyes of 34 camelids (16 llamas [Lama glamal and 18 alpacas [L. pacos]) that did not have major abnormalities of the ocular surface or intraocular abnormalities. PROCEDURE: Tonometry measurements were obtained from each eye 3 times during a 24-hour period. Each measurement was the mean of several corneal applanations obtained by use of an applanation tonometer. Data were analyzed, using an ANOVA for a repeated-measures design. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SEM) IOP of llamas and alpacas was 13.10+/-0.35 and 14.85+/-0.45 mm Hg, respectively. Range of IOP was 7 to 18 mm Hg for llamas and 11 to 21 mm Hg for alpacas. Mean IOP of llamas was significantly less than the mean IOP of alpacas. Significant differences in IOP were not detected between the right and left eye of animals. Significant differences in IOP were not attributed to sex, age, or time of measurement within llamas or alpacas. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishing the mean and range of IOP of clinically normal llamas and alpacas provides a frame of reference that is important for use in a complete ophthalmic examination of camelids, which can assist clinicians in the diagnosis of glaucoma and uveitis. Reasons for the difference in mean IOP between llamas and alpacas are unknown. Although the difference may be unimportant clinically, this finding reiterates the fact that caution must be used when extrapolating IOP among species.     

Evaluation of the Perkins® handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats

Objective  To evaluate and to validate the accuracy of the Perkins^® handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of IOP in dogs and cats.
Animals  Twenty eyes from 10 dogs and 10 cats immediately after sacrifice were used for the postmortem study and 20 eyes from 10 clinically normal and anesthetized dogs and cats were used for the in vivo study. Both eyes of 20 conscious dogs and cats were also evaluated.
Procedure  Readings of IOP postmortem and in vivo were taken using manometry (measured with a mercury column manometer) and tonometry (measured with a Perkins^® handheld applanation tonometer). The IOP measurement with Perkins^® tonometer in anesthetized and conscious dogs and cats was accomplished by instillation of proxymetacaine 0.5% and of 1% fluorescein eye drops.
Results  The correlation coefficient ( r ²) between the manometry and the Perkins^® tonometer were 0.982 (dogs) and 0.988 (cats), and the corresponding linear regression equation were y  = 0.0893 x  + 0.1105 (dogs) and y  = 0.0899 x  + 0.1145 (cats) in the postmortem study. The mean IOP readings with the Perkins^® tonometer after calibration curve correction were 14.9 ± 1.6 mmHg (range 12.2–17.2 mmHg) in conscious dogs, and were 15.1 ± 1.7 mmHg (range 12.1–18.7 mmHg) in conscious cats.
Conclusion  There was an excellent correlation between the IOP values obtained from direct ocular manometry and the Perkins^® tonometer in dogs and cats. The Perkins^® handheld tonometer could be in the future a new alternative for the diagnosis of glaucoma in veterinary ophthalmology.