佛教文化景观及其陈设要素设计在周园中的体现

佛教在我国宗教历史上有着重要地位,对我国文化产生了很大影响。因此,我国的佛教文化景观也是丰富而明显。如何将佛教文化景观在我国佛教景观中更好地融合和体现成为研究的目的。以南京周园为例,论述了佛教元素与中国园林景观的关系,继而讨论了佛教文化景观及其陈设要素设计在中国园林的体现。     

微缩景观文化的美学价值初探

微缩景观艺术在我国造园活动中历史久远,形成的门派风格众多,现代微缩景观设计能否将其蕴含的中国传统元素发展应用,是值得关注的一个重要议题。即从微缩景观艺术的意象、微缩景观艺术的美术思想和微缩景观设计的继承与创新等几个方面去探讨微缩景观艺术的美学价值及其应用。     

基于景观地域性下的中国古典园林的南北差异

随着城市化进程的加快发展,不同城市都产生了不同景观。本文基于景观地域性的中国古典园林存在的南北差异进行了探讨,保证我国的未来景观地域性文化发展具有重要意义。     

论园林设计在城市景观中作用及其理念创新

随着我国城市建设的发展,我国国民生活水平的提高,许多城市景观都在追求人与社会、自然和谐发展,这也就造成了我国城市景观对园林设计追求更高了。同时随着我国社会经济的快速发展,大多数人的精神文明追求也更高了,而城市景观建设又与人们日常工作生活环境密不可分,所以,将园林设计融入到城市景观建设中,并创新相应的理念,是推动城市景观建设和发展的必然趋势。     

浅谈城镇景观生态规划方法与实践

随着现代化社会的高速发展,我国建筑行业的发展得到显著提高,也使得我国城镇建设得到显著发展。现代化城镇建设发展在于景观生态规划,要做好景观生态规划就必须将景观生态规划中方法与实践放在首位,因为方法与实践才是景观生态规划发展的重要要素。我们需要不断提高城镇建设景观生态规划中的方法与实践能力,并不断增加经验,促进景观生态规划应用,降低成本以人为本才是城镇建设发展重点,同时也要将景观生态规划中的方法与实践作为发展目标,它也是保证城镇建设发展动力。     

“郊”的意趣——城市生态公园的价值构成与设计实践

城市化进程,使"郊"的景观在当代重新焕发光芒。"郊"是一个与现代化城市相对的空间概念与权属概念。如何将"郊"的意趣在城市生态公园中有效实现与合理地体现,并且将"农"与"艺"的景观元素融入"郊"文化景观中去。当代中国城市化的深入发展为中国的城市景观建设提出了挑战,同时也赋予中国城市景观以发展的新契机。     

我国园林景观设计现状及发展趋势分析

首先将园林设计过程中的相关概念进行了介绍,之后讲述了当前中国景观园林设计的发展情况,最后一部分对中国景观园林设计的未来发展趋势进行了相应的预测。     

法式园林对王家大院园林景观设计的影响

王家大院园林景观既有深厚的中国古典园林文化渊源,又有独到的法国现代景观理念,并将传统园林与现代景观完美结合的大院景观,在全国独树一帜。虽然就传统园林风格和表现手法而言,中法两国分处世界园林发展史上相反的两极,但就其深层次的园林文化和设计理念而言,两国之间又存在诸多相通相融的趋向,尤其为王家大院的景观起到了深刻的认知和情感的细腻投入,对我国园林景观发展有很深刻的影响。     

景观植物在园林造景中的应用研究

随着现代化快速发展,我国生活质量水平得到显著提高,促使园林工程得到显著发展,而园林设计人员需要不断对景观植物应用进行展现,本文主要针对现代园林景观植物应用及管理进行分析,同时也将园林景观植物应用内容进行总结,不断对景观植物应用水平进行强化。将景观植物应用作为发展重点,同时将景观植物应用作为发展目标也是保证园林工程快速发展。     

浅析中国传统园林对现代园林的影响

随着我国经济与科技发展速度不断加快,城市景观系统的革新也在不断加快,注重地域性的景观成为了人们所关心的焦点之一,对于文化的传承与创新成为景观设计不能忽略的问题。今天的中国景观虽然已经有了明显的进步,但并没有形成具有中国独有的特色景观形式。本文主要分析了中国传统园林所蕴含的文化精髓,以及如何运用到现代景观当中。     

风景园林规划设计课程实践性教学环节改革初探

风景园林规划设计课程是风景园林专业的核心课程,该课程中的实践性教学环节更是重中之重,其实施效果直接影响着本课程的教学效果和学生规划设计能力的提高。为促使浙江理工大学建筑工程学院风景园林专业持续向前健康发展,必须要使该课程的实践性教学环节与时俱进,紧跟行业发展态势,不断进行优化、改革,以适应行业的发展需求。     

Changing landscapes to accommodate for climate change impacts: a call for landscape ecology

Predictions of climate change suggest major changes in temperature, rainfall as well as in frequency and timing of extreme weather, all in varying degrees and patterns around the world. Although the details of these patterns changes are still uncertain, we can be sure of profound effects on ecological processes in and functioning of landscapes. The impact of climate change will affect all types of land use, ecosystem services, as well as the behavior of humans. The core business of Landscape Ecology is the interaction of landscape patterns and processes. Most of these interactions will be affected by changing climate patterns, so clearly within the focus of our science. Nevertheless, climate change received little attention from landscape ecologists. Are we missing the boat? Why is it that our science does not contribute to building a knowledge base to help solving this immense problem? Why is there so little attention paid to adaptation of landscape to climate change? With this editorial article IALE would like to receive inputs from the Landscape Ecology scientific community in related research on adaptation of landscapes to climate change, on tools or approaches to help landscape planners and stakeholders to this new challenge where landscape ecology can play a key role.     

Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here?

Landscape genetics is an emerging interdisciplinary field that combines methods and concepts from population genetics, landscape ecology, and spatial statistics. The interest in landscape genetics is steadily increasing, and the field is evolving rapidly. We here outline four major challenges for future landscape genetic research that were identified during an international landscape genetics workshop. These challenges include (1) the identification of appropriate spatial and temporal scales; (2) current analytical limitations; (3) the expansion of the current focus in landscape genetics; and (4) interdisciplinary communication and education. Addressing these research challenges will greatly improve landscape genetic applications, and positively contribute to the future growth of this promising field. Participants of the Landscape Genetics Research Agenda Workshop, held at the 2007 World Congress of the International Association of Landscape Ecologists (IALE), in Wageningen, The Netherlands: Paul Arens, Pascal Campagne, Virginia H. Dale, Alfredo G. Nicieza, Marinus J. M. Smulders, Edoardo Tedesco, Hongfang Wang, Tzeidle Wasserman.     

传统文化与现代别墅生活——道家文化与西安楼观古镇设计

随着经济的发展,文化的普及,人们的居住观念和居住环境的需求也逐步发生变化,越来越多的人对现代居住环境产生了更多更高的追求;景观与生态环境、邻里和谐与人文环境的追求上,人们的期望越来越高。文章以理论联系实际的方法作为论文的主线,以传统文化与景观设计学原理为指导,通过对西安楼观古镇景观带的设计并提出传统文化与精神价值在今后的别墅景观设计中将成为核心。另外从传统文化的基础上研究当代别墅的景观设计,通过传统文化与美学的研究,提升人们的审美情趣,从而培育出高质量的生活环境。     

Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis

Landscape ecology has made tremendous progress in recent decades, but as a rapidly developing discipline it is faced with new problems and challenges. To identify the key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology, a special session entitled “Top 10 List for Landscape Ecology in the 21st Century” was organized at the 16th Annual Symposium of the US Regional Association of International Association of Landscape Ecology, held at Arizona State University (Tempe, Arizona, USA) during April 25–29, 2001. A group of leading landscape ecologists were invited to present their views. This paper is intended to be a synthesis, but not necessarily a consensus, of the special session. We have organized the diverse and wide-ranging perspectives into six general key issues and 10 priority research topics. The key issues are: (1) interdisciplinarity or transdisciplinarity, (2) integration between basic research and applications,(3) Conceptual and theoretical development, (4) education and training, (5)international scholarly communication and collaborations, and (6) outreach and communication with the public and decision makers. The top 10 research topics are: (1) ecological flows in landscape mosaics, (2) causes, processes, and consequences of land use and land cover change, (3) nonlinear dynamics and landscape complexity, (4) scaling, (5) methodological development, (6) relating landscape metrics to ecological processes, (7) integrating humans and their activities into landscape ecology, (8) optimization of landscape pattern, (9)landscape sustainability, and (10) data acquisition and accuracy assessment. We emphasize that, although this synthesis was based on the presentations at the“Top 10 List” session, it is not a document that has been agreed upon by each and every participant. Rather, we believe that it is reflective of the broad-scale vision of the collective as to where landscape ecology is now and where it may be going in future. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

关于风景园林行业市场领域分类的思考

从园林投资主体和使用目的的角度,把园林市场划分为市政类园林、地产类园林、企事业单位类园林、生态修复类园林、私家园林(艺)、园林苗木和养护7种主要类型,并对前5种概念给出定义,可供园林行业市场领域研究参考.     

以需求为导向 以设计为核心——长春建筑学院园林专业课程体系和教学内容改革

为进一步深化园林本科教育教学改革,以市场需求为导向,创新人才培养模式,优化人才培养过程,提高教育质量,更好地服务地方及国家的城市建设和经济发展,对长春建筑学院园林专业课程体系和教学内容进行改革,突出对学生设计能力和动手能力的培养。改革的成果现已在2012级园林专业本科生中全面实施。     

Evolving landscapes in the headwaters area of the Yellow River (China) and their ecological implications

The relationship and feedback between landscape pattern, function and process serve to describe the behavior of a regional landscape. Based on landscape function characteristics such as biological productivity, soil nutrient content, vegetative cover, etc., a quantitative method and digital model for analyzing evolving landscape functionality in the headwaters area of the Yellow River in the People's Republic of China were devised. Through the analysis of three-phase remote sensing data from 1975, 1985 and 1995 and based upon the well-defined characteristics of this region's evolving landscape over the past 30 years, the attendant ecology of the different functional landscape ecotypes was investigated. Between 1975 and 1995 the area of AC&S (alpine cold meadow and steppe) in the source area of the Yellow River has decreased by 27.25%, ACSW (alpine cold swamp meadow) has decreased by 27.04%, ALP (alpine steppe) by 38.18% and lakes by 9.78%. The grass biomass production decreased by 752.37 Gg, of which AC&S meadows accounted for 83.8% of these losses. The overall stock capacity of the headwaters area of the Yellow River decreased by 518.36 thousand sheep units. Soil nutrients showed a similar pattern, soil nutrient loss was greater from 1985–1995 than from 1975–1985. Changes in the overall ecological functionality of the area were not simply a result of a summation of the changes associated with individual evolving landscapes, but rather an integration of positive and negative influences. Landscape evolution occurs in two main directions: degradation and strengthening (expanding and improving). An understanding of the direction, force and integration of parameters influencing landscape evolution as it impacts the attending ecosystems can allow one to foresee how the landscape of the Yellow River source area will evolve in the coming years. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

对景观设计方法的研究与分析

景观设计与规划林,生态,地理等多种学科交叉融合,在不同的学科中具有不同的意义,"景观设计"(又叫做景观建筑学)是指在建筑设计或规划设计的过程中,对周围环境要素的整体考虑和设计包括自然要素和人工要素。使得建筑(群)与自然环境产生呼应关系,使其使用更方便,更舒适,提高其整体的艺术价值。     

Landscape – What’s in it? Trends in European Landscape Science and Priority Themes for Concerted Research

Reflecting on the other papers in this special issue, this synopsis characterises some essential trends in European Landscape Ecology, including the challenges it is facing in society. It describes the various perspectives on the ‘contents’ of landscape that are currently being practiced, and especially considers the notion of ‘environment’ as something intrinsic to human activity. Landscape classification and typology are discussed in their potential but limited use for landscape science. The specificity of the European approach appears to be related to the large diversity of cultural landscapes, currently losing their functional ties with the land-use systems that had formed them. European landscape research reports show a large commitment to this decreasing diversity, a dedication characterised by a strong sense of ‘loss and grief’. On the other hand, it is concluded that European landscape research has a specific niche with a clear focus on applied landscape studies explicitly including people’s perceptions and images, as well as the participation of the public and stakeholders. Since globalisation tends to reinforce the detachment of people from their environment; an increased effort is needed to compensate for this effect, and therefore the consideration of the various dimensions of the landscape is today more pertinent than ever. Meeting the challenges of present landscapes, in the face of new multifunctional demands in old diverse landscapes, requires more than before the combination of various perspectives and methods, and of various scales of application, in order to design innovative and adaptive paths for the future.