Pathogenicity and virulence factors of Pseudomonas syringae

In 1994, Oku reported that plant pathogens, mainly fungal pathogens, require three essential abilities to infect plants: to enter plants, to overcome host resistance, and to evoke disease. Because the infectious process of phytopathogenic bacteria differs from that of fungal pathogens, we have attempted to characterize pathogenicity, the ability of a pathogen to cause disease, using the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae as a representative pathogen. To establish infection and incite disease development, bacteria first have to enter a plant. This process requires flagella- and type IV pili-mediated motility, and active taxis is probably necessary for effective infection. After bacteria enter a plant’s apoplastic spaces, they need to overcome host plant resistance. To do this, they secrete a wide variety of hypersensitive response and pathogenicity (Hrp) effector proteins into the plant cytoplasm to interfere with pathogen/microbe-associated molecular pattern- and effector-triggered immunity, produce phytohormones and/or phytotoxins to suppress plant defense responses and extracellular polysaccharides to prevent access by antibiotics and to chelate Ca²⁺, and activate the multidrug resistance efflux pump to extrude antimicrobial compounds for successful colonization. Furthermore, to evoke disease, bacteria produce toxins and Hrp effectors that compromise a plant’s homeostasis and injure plant cells. The expression of these virulence factors depends on the infection processes and environmental conditions. Thus, the expression and function of virulence factors interact with each other, creating complex networks in the regulation of bacterial virulence-related genes.     

Target the core: durable plant resistance against filamentous plant pathogens through effector recognition

Plant pathogens colonize their host through the secretion of effector proteins that modulate plant metabolism and immune responses to their benefit. Plants evolve towards effector recognition, leading to host immunity. Typically, pathogen effectors are targets for recognition through plant receptors that are encoded by resistance genes. Resistance gene mediated crop immunity puts a tremendous pressure on pathogens to adapt and alter their effector repertoire to overcome recognition. We argue that the type of effector that is recognized by the host may have considerable implications on the durability of resistance against filamentous plant pathogens. Effector genes that are conserved among pathogens and reside in core genome regions are most likely to hold indispensable virulence functions. Consequently, the cost for the pathogen to overcome recognition by the host is higher than for diversified, host‐specific effectors with a quantitative impact on virulence. Consequently, resistance genes that directly target conserved effector proteins without the interception of other effector proteins are potentially excellent resistance resources. © 2019 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.     

The secreted proteome of necrotrophic Ciborinia camelliae causes nonhost-specific virulence

Ciborinia camelliae (Sclerotiniaceae) is a host- and organ-specific fungal pathogen that causes rapid browning and flower drop on ornamental plants of the genus Camellia. To determine the nature of its necrotrophic factors, we tested whether proteins secreted by C. camelliae can damage host-plant tissues. Fungal culture filtrate caused necrogenic activity, abolished by heat or protease treatments, thus indicating that the secreted necrogenic agents are probably proteinaceous in nature. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics was used to detect and identify secreted proteins of C. camelliae. Proteins secreted in culture media (in vitro) and in petal apoplast (in planta) had similar functional distributions, and key identified proteins included homologs to known virulence factors of the closely related Sclerotiniaceae fungus Botrytis cinerea, including endopolygalacturonases, cerato-platanin family proteins, and necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptides. The main class of secreted proteins were carbohydrate-active enzymes, a characteristic signature of necrotrophic plant pathogens. Both fungal culture filtrate and apoplastic washes of infected petals induced necrosis when infiltrated into host and nonhost plants. This suggests that while some of the secreted proteins might contribute to virulence of C. camelliae, and can cause necrosis similar to secreted proteins of broad-host Sclerotiniaceae pathogens, they do not have a role in determining its host specificity.     

Biochemical and physiological responses to long‐term Citrus tristeza virus infection in Mexican lime plants

Reactions that occur when a plant is subjected to Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) infection often result in triggering of numerous defence mechanisms to fight the infection. The reactions vary according to virus strain, host genotype, time of exposure to the infection and environmental conditions. To date, no study has examined in detail the consequences of 10‐year exposure to CTV infection on the biochemical and physiological status of susceptible Mexican lime plants (Citrus aurantifolia). To understand the reaction of such plants, changes in nutrient status, total proteins, enzyme activity involved in scavenging of reactive oxygen species, photosynthetic and transpiration rates, chlorophyll content, membrane permeability and water content were analysed in plants infected with different CTV isolates and in healthy plants. The activity of superoxide dismutase and polyphenol oxidase significantly decreased in the infected leaves, and membrane permeability was lower in the infected plants. Macro‐ and micronutrient elements were significantly changed: concentrations of leaf nitrogen, zinc, magnesium and iron were elevated but potassium concentration depressed in comparison to noninfected control leaves. Levels of other analysed nutrient elements, enzymes, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content and relative water content were unchanged. Clear physiological changes were found among infected and noninfected control plants but none between plants infected with different CTV isolates. The data suggest that some of the defence mechanisms investigated here were suppressed due to the continuous and long‐term pressure of biotic stress.     

Plant immunisation: from myth to SAR

The idea that plants might be able to develop a form of acquired immunity to infection following exposure to a pathogen has been current ever since discovery of the animal immune system in the later years of the nineteenth century. Early attempts to demonstrate a comparable system in plants focused on the detection of precipitating antibodies and hence were doomed to failure. Nevertheless, largely anecdotal evidence for plant immunisation continued to accumulate, culminating in the discovery of phytoalexins in the 1940s. Convincing evidence for systemic changes in plant resistance following an inducer inoculation was not available until 20 years later, when pioneering work on tobacco infected with blue mould (Peronospora tabacina) or tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) showed that tissues remote from the inoculation site were altered in disease reaction type. Increased resistance was expressed as a reduction in lesion numbers and size, and a reduced rate of pathogen reproduction. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) has now been demonstrated in at least 20 plant species in at least six plant families, although detailed genetic or molecular analysis has mainly been confined to a few models, such as tobacco, cucumber and Arabidopsis. SAR is associated with the coordinate induction of genes encoding defence proteins which can be used as molecular markers of the response. The availability of Arabidopsis mutants altered in the induction and expression of SAR is now providing new insights into the signal transduction pathway(s) involved, and will enable comparison with the molecular mechanisms operating in other plant taxa. Important unresolved questions concern the nature of the translocated signal, the mechanism of defence ‘priming’, efficacy of the response against different pathogens, and practical exploitation of SAR in crop protection. The first generation of chemical plant defence activators is now commercially available and optimal use of these SAR inducers in integrated disease control requires further evaluation. The prospects for engineering transgenic crops altered in the regulation or expression of SAR is also a subject for further investigation. © 1999 Society of Chemical Industry     

Cytomolecular aspects of rice sheath blight caused by <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rhizoctonia solani</Emphasis>

Sheath blight, caused by anastomosis group 1-IA of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn (teleomorph Thanatephorus cucumeris (Frank) Donk), is one of the most destructive rice diseases worldwide. The pathogen is able to infect plants belonging to more than 27 families, including many economically important monocots and dicots such as rice, wheat, alfalfa, bean, peanut, soybean, cucumber, papaya, corn, potato, tomato and sugar beet. It is a soil borne necrotrophic fungus that survives in plant debris as sclerotia, which are small brown-to-black, rocklike reproductive structures. The sclerotia can survive in the soil for several years and infect rice plants at the water-plant interface in the flooded field by producing mycelia. Management of rice sheath blight requires an integrated approach based on the knowledge of each stage of the disease and cytomolecular aspects of rice defence responses against R. solani. This review summarizes current knowledge on molecular aspects of R. solani pathogenicity, genetic structure of the pathogen populations, and the rice-R. solani interaction with emphasis on cellular and molecular defence components such as signal transduction pathways, various plant hormones, host defence genes and production of defence-related proteins involved in basal and induced resistance in rice against sheath blight disease.     

肺炎克雷伯氏菌(Klebsiella pneumoniae)对植物影响的研究进展

 肺炎克雷伯氏菌(Klebsiella pneumoniae)不仅是重要的人和动物的条件致病菌和食源性致病菌,也是一种能够跨界侵染植物的病原菌。K. pneumoniae能够以植物作为回到人和动物寄主的载体,在植物的附生或内生生长是其生命周期的重要组成部分。它还能够跨越生物界直接侵染玉米、香蕉、石榴、高粱等,引起植物病害。在不同环境中生存的生态适应性是K. pneumoniae跨界侵染的机制。K. pneumoniae很可能利用与感染动物相同或不同的策略来侵染植物,但其机制有待进一步研究。本文综述了K. pneumoniae对植物影响的研究进展,重点介绍了其对植物的致病性,并对其众多的生态位进行了讨论。     

植物水通道蛋白结构与功能及其识别与转导水稻黄单胞菌Hpa1信号的机制

 植物水通道蛋白PIP不仅担负细胞间或细胞内外水分子输导的基本功能,还参与植物-微生物互作与植物防卫反应,这种双重功能的调控机制目前还不清楚。水稻OsPIP1;2和拟南芥AtPIP1;4可以与水稻黄单胞III型泌出蛋白Hpa1互作,Hpa1定位于植物细胞的质外体,诱导过氧化氢在质外体产生及向原生质转运,进而影响植物防卫反应与对病原细菌的抗性。根据植物水通道蛋白拓扑结构与病原细菌Ⅲ型分泌系统工作模型,水稻OsPIP1;2与Hpa1互作的功能域是互作发生的分子基础。互作引发信号转导,调控过氧化氢信号从植物细胞的质外体向原生质转运与植物防卫反应。由于Hpa1对Ⅲ效应蛋白来说具有转位子的功能特征,OsPIP1;2-Hpa1还可能对水稻黄单胞菌Ⅲ型效应蛋白从细菌细胞向植物细胞转运发生调控作用。围绕这些设想进行研究,可以深入阐释水稻-黄单胞菌互作机制,同时为植物水通道蛋白功能调控提供新的见解。     

Biochemical responses associated with common bean defence against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in defence compounds of common bean cultivars with different levels of resistance to the fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and determine the relation of the compounds to pathogen tolerance. The lines were inoculated with the pathogen and assessed for enzymatic and non-enzymatic parameters related to plant defence: peroxidases (POX), polyphenol oxidases (PPO), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), total soluble phenol and lignin contents. Stem tissue samples were collected from two regions of the plant for biochemical analyses. Stem tissue samples were collected from two regions of the plant for biochemical analyses. In the position one, 5 cm of the stem was collected from the region with necrosis caused by the pathogen, and in the position two, 5 cm of the stem was collected from the end of the position one at the times of 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h after inoculation (HAI). Greater lignin and total soluble phenol contents and greater induction of POX and SOD activity in inoculated plants in the region near the inoculation (position one) indicate local activation with later signalling for activation of defence mechanisms in other regions of the plant. The genotype with a greater level of resistance was superior to the susceptible one in regard to lignin production and the activities of POX, APX and SOD defence enzymes. These results suggest that a combination of these defence responses in common bean may contribute to greater plant resistance to the pathogen and that these enzymes have potential use in selection of common bean genotypes.     

Pathogenesis by fungi and by parasitic plants: Similarities and differences

The processes by which fungi and parasitic plants infect their plant host are compared. The steps considered are: location of the host by the pathogen, the concept of the haustorium, attachment of the pathogen to the host, mechanism of penetration into the host, responses of the host to infection by fungi and by parasitic plants, and the suppression of the host response by the pathogen. Although superficially similarities between fungal infection and infection by parasitic plants exist, the underlying mechanisms appear to be different and only in the penetration step are similar strategies used, including the use of lytic enzymes. These differences are important when seeking ways of combating the parasitic plants. The strategies used against the parasitic plants must be different from those used to combat fungal infections and should not be based only on analogies with host resistance to fungal pathogens. http://www.phytoparasitica.org posting Nov. 2, 2005.     

Comprehensive prediction of plant cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors underlying Erwinia psidii pathogenicity

Erwinia psidii (Eps) is the causal agent of emerging diseases of eucalypt and guava; however, the mechanisms underlying its pathogenicity are not fully understood. Here, we predicted factors involved in the ability of Eps to cause disease on its host plants. For that, the genomes of four Eps strains exhibiting different virulence on eucalypt were sequenced, and hrp/hrc genes coding for the type III secretion system (T3SS), effectors injected into the plant cell cytoplasm through the T3SS (T3SEs) and their plant subcellular localizations, as well as proteins deployed to the host apoplast, were predicted. It was found that Eps possesses a complete hrp/hrc gene cluster based on comparison with Erwinia amylovora. A total of 18 T3SEs were predicted, 11 of which were shared among all strains, none were exclusive to any strain and seven were absent in at least one strain. No sequence variation among strains was found for five T3SE candidates whereas extensive variation was found for six, suggesting the latter may be determinants of virulence differences. The T3SE candidates are predicted to target the plant cell nucleus, cytoplasm, mitochondrion, chloroplast and peroxisome. The predicted apoplastic effector repertoire common to all four strains was over-represented in proteins of unknown functions or predicted to possess enzymatic activities, among which the most abundant were oxidoreductases and peptidases. Proteins with lytic transglycosylase activity were predicted in strain-specific apoplastic effector repertoires. These results provide an important framework for future research aimed at uncovering the factors underlying Eps pathogenicity.     

Components of different signalling pathways regulated by a new orthologue of AtPROPEP1 in tomato following infection by pathogens

Plants express different defence mechanisms in response to pathogens. Understanding the recognition of pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by specific receptors, and the role of endogenous signals such as AtPep1 that regulate expression of genes in Arabidopsis thaliana, has aided the understanding of the defence mechanisms in different species. The aim of this study was to identify possible orthologous sequences of AtPROPEPs in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and characterize its role in resistance to necrotrophic pathogens. The presence of an orthologue of the A. thaliana AtPROPEP1 gene in S. lycopersicum, SlPROPEP, by in silico analysis, is reported here. This has 96% identity with the C‐terminal region of a previously described potato peptide, another possible orthologue of AtPep1. A virus‐induced gene silencing (VIGS) system was employed to investigate the role of the SlPROPEP. Silencing of SlPROPEP in tomato made plants more susceptible to Pythium dissotocum; approximately 30% of SlPROPEP‐silenced plants showed stem constriction compared with 4% in control plants. Furthermore, quantification of P. dissotocum by qPCR revealed that the increase in symptom severity in SlPROPEP‐silenced plants was associated with a 15 times increase in growth of the pathogen compared to control plants. Silencing of SlPROPEP also resulted in decreased expression of genes involved in plant defence against pathogens, such as PR‐1, PR‐5, ERF1, LOX‐D and DEF2. These results suggest that SlPROPEP is involved in tomato resistance to P. dissotocum and probably acts as a pathogen‐associated molecular pattern through signalling pathways mediated by jasmonic acid/ethylene (JA/ET).     

Effect of light and dark on the growth and development of downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis

Disease development in plants requires a susceptible host, a virulent pathogen, and a favourable environment. Oomycete pathogens cause many important diseases and have evolved sophisticated molecular mechanisms to manipulate their hosts. Day length has been shown to impact plant–oomycete interactions but a need exists for a tractable reference system to understand the mechanistic interplay between light regulation, oomycete pathogen virulence, and plant host immunity. Here we present data demonstrating that light is a critical factor in the interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and its naturally occurring downy mildew pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa). We investigated the role of light on spore germination, mycelium development, sporulation, and oospore formation of Hpa, along with defence responses in the host. We observed abundant Hpa sporulation on compatible Arabidopsis under day lengths ranging from 10 to 14 hr. In contrast, exposure to constant light or constant dark suppressed sporulation. Exposure to constant dark suppressed spore germination, mycelial development, and oospore formation, whereas exposure to constant light stimulated these three stages of development. A biomarker of plant immune system activation was induced under both constant light and constant dark. Altogether, these findings demonstrate that Hpa has the molecular mechanisms to perceive and respond to light and that both the host and pathogen responses are influenced by the light regime. Therefore, this pathosystem can be used for investigations to understand the molecular mechanisms through which oomycete pathogens like Hpa perceive and integrate light signals, and how light influences pathogen virulence and host immunity during their interactions.     

Moss-Erwinia pathosystem reveals possible similarities in pathogenesis and pathogen defense in vascular and nonvascular plants

Vascular plants have various inducible resistance mechanisms as defense against pathogens. Mosses, small nonvascular plants (subkingdom Bryophyta), have been little studied in regard to their pathogens or modes of defense. Data here show that Erwinia carotovora, a bacterial plant pathogen that causes softrot in many dicotyledonous plants, can also cause soft rot symptoms in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Infection of moss by E. carotovora required pathogenicity factors similar to those required to infect vascular plants and, again as in vascular plants, salicylic acid (SA) induced moss to inhibit tissue maceration by Erwinia. These data reveal that SA-dependent defense pathways may have evolved before differentiation of vascular and nonvascular plants.     

Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Non-pathogenic soilborne microorganisms can promote plant growth, as well as suppress diseases. Plant growth promotion is taken to result from improved nutrient acquisition or hormonal stimulation. Disease suppression can occur through microbial antagonism or induction of resistance in the plant. Several rhizobacterial strains have been shown to act as plant growth-promoting bacteria through both stimulation of growth and induced systemic resistance (ISR), but it is not clear in how far both mechanisms are connected. Induced resistance is manifested as a reduction of the number of diseased plants or in disease severity upon subsequent infection by a pathogen. Such reduced disease susceptibility can be local or systemic, result from developmental or environmental factors and depend on multiple mechanisms. The spectrum of diseases to which PGPR-elicited ISR confers enhanced resistance overlaps partly with that of pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Both ISR and SAR represent a state of enhanced basal resistance of the plant that depends on the signalling compounds jasmonic acid and salicylic acid, respectively, and pathogens are differentially sensitive to the resistances activated by each of these signalling pathways. Root-colonizing Pseudomonas bacteria have been shown to alter plant gene expression in roots and leaves to different extents, indicative of recognition of one or more bacterial determinants by specific plant receptors. Conversely, plants can alter root exudation and secrete compounds that interfere with quorum sensing (QS) regulation in the bacteria. Such two-way signalling resembles the interaction of root-nodulating Rhizobia with legumes and between mycorrhizal fungi and roots of the majority of plant species. Although ISR-eliciting rhizobacteria can induce typical early defence-related responses in cell suspensions, in plants they do not necessarily activate defence-related gene expression. Instead, they appear to act through priming of effective resistance mechanisms, as reflected by earlier and stronger defence reactions once infection occurs.     

Fertilization affects severity of disease caused by fungal plant pathogens

Commercial fertilizers are commonly applied in farming to maximize crop yield. Lifting nutrient limitation to plant growth when water and light conditions are sufficient may permit plants to grow to the maximum of their ability; however, plant ability to resist pathogen infections is also modified. A meta‐analysis was conducted on 57 articles to identify the way plant disease severity of fungal pathogen‐induced infection is modified following fertilization, and the key regulators of such an effect. The analysis largely focused on N fertilization events in order to minimize the effect of heterogeneity that could result from differences in the way different nutrient fertilizers are able to modify plant disease severity. Fungal pathogen identity and fungal pathogen lifestyle were the main significant regulators affecting the extent of the modification of plant disease resistance following N fertilization, whereas contradictory results were obtained with the susceptibility of plant species. No differences were detected between pot or field experiments and following artificial or natural infection. Although in the vast majority of instances N fertilization increased disease severity, characteristic plant species and fungal pathogens could be identified for which disease severity following N fertilization declined. It is concluded that the potential of some plant species such as Solanum spp. to show reduced disease severity following N fertilization requires further investigation, as in such cases N fertilization could potentially be used as an additional means of suppressing fungal pathogens.