共查询到5条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Mining new resources for grape resistance against Botryosphaeriaceae: a focus on Vitis vinifera subsp. sylvestris 下载免费PDF全文
Botryosphaeria dieback is an important grapevine trunk disease with global impact. Susceptibility differences between grape varieties manifest as different expression of canopy symptoms in the field. However, the cause of these dieback symptoms and their relation with wood necrosis remain only partially understood. As a first step towards future strategies for resistance breeding, wood necrosis was investigated over a large selection of the Vitaceae family members following artificial inoculation of the Botryosphaeriaceae fungi Neofusicoccum parvum and Diplodia seriata into woody internodes. Large variation of resistance levels was found, with good performance in several accessions from V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris, the ancestor of cultivated grapevine. To get insight into the mechanisms of this apparent resistance, expression of defence genes was studied in V. vinifera cv. Chardonnay, Gewürztraminer and different V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris genotypes, in both green and necrotic areas of inoculated woods. Resistance to Botryosphaeriaceae in V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris correlated with earlier and higher induction of some defence genes, both in green and necrotic wood. Moreover, leaves of several V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris accessions were also less susceptible to necrosis induced by treatment with a culture filtrate of Botryosphaeriaceae, compared to commercial cultivars of V. vinifera. The results show that V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris provides interesting genetic resources for breeding new varieties with enhanced resistance to botryosphaeria dieback. 相似文献
2.
The susceptibility of 1‐ and 2‐year‐old grapevine wood to botryosphaeria canker caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum parvum was evaluated in California in two seasons. In the 2007 dormant season, pruning‐wound susceptibility was highest when wounds were inoculated immediately after pruning in December (80% of pruning wounds were infected in Chardonnay for both fungal species and 75% and 98% in Cabernet Sauvignon for N. parvum and L. theobromae, respectively). In the 2008 dormant season, pruning‐wound susceptibility was highest in November in Chardonnay (86% and 93% for N. parvum and L. theobromae, respectively) and in December in Cabernet Sauvignon (71% and 75% for N. parvum and L. theobromae, respectively). The lowest infection rates (13–35%) were observed when vines were pruned and inoculated in March in both dormant seasons and for both cultivars. Susceptibility of pruning wounds did not differ significantly (P = 0·7612) between 1‐ and 2‐year‐old wood and consequently, pruning‐wound protection treatments should be applied to all wounds. In conclusion, grapevine pruning wounds were susceptible to infection by L. theobromae and N. parvum to varying extents throughout the dormant season in California (November–March), but, overall, susceptibility of pruning wounds was highest when inoculations were done immediately after pruning and decreased significantly as the interval between pruning and inoculation increased. Results of this study suggest that pruning grapevines in late winter (March) in California would significantly reduce the risk of infection by L. theobromae and N. parvum. 相似文献
3.
4.
Isolation,production and in vitro effects of the major secondary metabolite produced by Trichoderma species used for the control of grapevine trunk diseases 下载免费PDF全文
Antibiosis has been shown to be an important mode of action by Trichoderma species used in the protection of grapevine pruning wounds from infection by trunk pathogens. The major active compound from Trichoderma isolates known to protect grapevine pruning wounds from trunk pathogen infection was isolated and identified. The compound, a 6‐pentyl‐α‐pyrone (6PP), was found to be the major secondary metabolite, by quantity, which accumulated in the culture filtrate of T. harzianum isolate T77 and the two T. atroviride isolates UST1 and UST2. Benzimidazole resistant mutants generated from these isolates also produced 6PP as their main secondary metabolite, except for a mutant of T77 that had lost its ability to produce 6PP. The isolates UST1 and UST2 were co‐cultured with the grapevine trunk pathogens Eutypa lata and Neofusicoccum parvum in a minimal defined medium and a grapevine cane‐based medium (GCBM). Co‐culturing UST1 with N. parvum induced 6PP production in the minimal defined medium and the GCBM. The production of 6PP by UST2 was induced in the GCBM, while co‐culturing with the two trunk pathogens either reduced or had no effect on 6PP production. Mycelial growth and ascospore/conidia germination of E. lata, N. australe, N. parvum and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora were inhibited by 6PP in a concentration‐dependent manner. The results show that the presence of N. parvum and grapevine wood elicits the production of 6PP, suggesting that this metabolite is involved in Trichoderma–pathogen interactions on grapevine pruning wounds. 相似文献