Overview of the Second International Workshop to define swine cluster of differentiation (CD) antigens

The aim of the Second International Swine Cluster of Differentiation (CD) Workshop, supported by the Veterinary Immunology Committee (VIC) of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS), was to standardize the assignment of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) reactive with porcine leukocyte differentiation antigens and to define new antibody clusters. At the summary meeting of the workshop in July, 1995, revisions in the existing nomenclature for Swine CD were approved, so that the rules are now in accord with those for human and ruminant CD. Swine CD numbers will now be given to clusters of mAb to swine orthologues of human CD molecules when homology is proven by (1) suitable tissue distribution and lymphoid cell subset expression, (2) appropriate molecular mass of the antigen recognized by the mAbs, and (3) reactivity of mAbs with the cloned swine gene products, or cross-reactivity of the mAb on the human gene products. In some cases, this reactivity would not be fully proven, mainly due to the lack of cloned gene products; for these CD antigens, the respective clusters will be assigned by the prefix ‘w' which will lead to ‘wCD' antigens. As a result of the Second International Swine CD Workshop the assignment of 16 mAb to existing CD groups (CD2a, CD4a, CD5a, wCD6, wCD8, CD14, CD18a, wCD21, wCD25) was confirmed, and 2 mAb to existing swine workshop clusters (SWC). More importantly, for the work on the porcine immune system, was the definition of 5 new swine CD antigens, namely CD3 (recognized by 6 new mAb and 3 epitopes), CD16 (1 new mAb), wCD29 (2 mAb), CD45RA (3 mAb) and CD45RC (1 new mAb). Finally, the demarcation of two new SWC molecules in swine, SWC8 (2 mAb) and SWC9 (2 mAb) was confirmed.     

Analyses of monoclonal antibodies reacting with porcine wCD6: Results from the Second International Swine CD workshop

Among the 57 monoclonal antibodies analyzed within the T-cell group of the Second International Swine CD Workshop, one mAb fell within cluster T14a that included the CD6 standard a38b2 (No. 175). The new mAb MIL8 (No. 082) and a38b2 both precipitated from activated T-cells a 150 kDa monomeric protein. Staining patterns on the various cell types were similar. There was no inhibition of binding of either mAb to peripheral blood T-cells with the opposite mAb. The new mAb, MIL8, reacts with a separate epitope on porcine wCD6.     

Overview of the Third International Workshop on Swine Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens.

The aim of the Third International Workshop on Swine Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens (CD workshop), supported by the Veterinary Immunology Committee (VIC) of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS), was to standardize the assignment of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) reactive with porcine leukocyte differentiation antigens and to define new antibody clusters, using nomenclature in accordance with human and ruminant CD nomenclature, as agreed at the summary meeting of the Second International Swine CD Workshop in Davis, 1995: only mAb with proven reactivity for the orthologous porcine gene product or cross-reactivity for the human gene products, were given the full CD nomenclature, all other allocations were prefixed with "w". As in previous workshops, the overall organization was entrusted to the chair and first author, with support by the chair of the previous workshop and second author. In addition to the existing 26 pig leukocyte CD/SWC determinants established in previous workshops, this workshop established/confirmed another 11 CDs for pig leukocytes, identified by a total of 21 mAb: CD11R1 (2 mAb), CD11R2 (1 mAb), CD11R3 (4 mAb), wCD40 (1 mAb), wCD46 (4 mAb), wCD47 (3 mAb), wCD49d (1 mAb), CD61 (1 mAb), wCD92 (1 mAb), wCD93 (1 mAb) and CD163 (2 mAb).     

Monoclonal antibodies putatively identifying porcine B cells

Comparison was made of the binding of 38 test and three standard monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to B cells from various pig lymphoid tissues by flow cytometry (FCM) and immunohistochemistry. Some mAbs were also tested on B cells from foetal pig tissues. Twenty of the new mAbs bound, though to variable degrees, to porcine B cells but only three were given cluster assignations: C35 (#147) and BB6-11C9 (#167) were assigned to wCD21 and 2F6/8 (#057) was assigned to SWC7.     

Summary of workshop findings for antibodies reacting with porcine T-cells and activation antigens: results from the Second International Swine CD Workshop

After initial evaluation of the 176 new and 19 control monoclonal antibodies (mAb) submitted to the Second International Swine CD Workshop, 57 were assigned to the T-cell/activation marker subgroup. These 57 mAb were further analyzed using flow cytometry on whole blood lymphocytes, splenocytes, Peyer's patch lymphocytes, in vitro cell lines, broncho-alveolar lavage cells, Con A and PHA blasts, fetal cell populations, and by 2-color flow cytometry against mAb to porcine CD2, CD4, and CD8. Finally, the molecular weights of the target antigens were characterized when possible. As a result of these analyses, 23 mAb were distributed into 7 CD clusters. Newly confirmed mAb assignments included: two CD2; one CD4; two CD5; one wCD6; and one wCD25. Three new mAb were found that reacted with wCD8, one of which defined a new epitope, wCD8c. For the first time, mAb against porcine CD3 were identified, including 6 mAb that reacted with three different epitopes. Several new mAb reacted with antigens whose expression varied depending on the activation state of the test cell. These will require further characterization in order to assign a CD number.     

Differentiation of porcine myeloid bone marrow haematopoietic cell populations.

The myeloid panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) submitted to the Third Swine CD Workshop were analysed for reactivity with bone marrow haematopoietic cells (BMHC). Using single and triple immunofluorescence labelling by flow cytometry (FCM), the mAbs were grouped according to their capacity to recognise myeloid cell populations and/or maturation stages. Group 1 consisted of mAbs labelling the majority of myeloid BMHC, including neutrophilic, eosinophilic and monocytic cells. The ligands for SWC3 and CD11b-like mAbs of group 1 showed a maturation-dependent intensity of expression. The other antibodies of group 1 reacted with BMHC to give a sharp, single peak. Group 2 mAbs reacted only with monocytic cells. The anti-human CD49e mAb Sam-1 was the only mAb detecting the majority of monocytic cells, but not other BMHC. The mAbs in group 3 recognised antigens expressed on granulocytes, but not monocytes. The previously identified SWC8 in this group proved to be useful in differentiating major population of BMHC when cells were double labelled with the pan-myeloid SWC3. Other mAbs within group 3, such as MIL4 and TMG6-5 (an anti-human CD11b), only recognised subsets of neutrophils and eosinophils. Group 4 mAbs reacted with the more mature subpopulations of neutrophils and monocytes. Some of these antibodies might prove useful for assessment of cell maturity, such as anti-CD14 and the anti-human CD50 mAb HP2/19.     

Report on the analyses of mAb reactive with porcine CD8 for the second international swine CD workshop

Based on an analysis of their reactivity with porcine peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), only three of the 57 mAbs assigned to the T cell/activation marker group were grouped into cluster T9 along with the two wCD8 workshop standard mAbs 76-2-11 (CD8a) and 11/295/33 (CD8b). Their placement was verified through the use of two-color cytofluorometry which established that all three mAbs (STH101, #090; UCP1H12-2, #139; and PG164A, #051) bind exclusively to CD8⁺ cells. Moreover, like the CD8 standard mAbs, these three mAbs reacted with two proteins with a MW of 33 and 35 kDa from lymphocyte lysates and were, thus, given the wCD8 designation. Because the mAb STH101 inhibited the binding of mAb 76-2-11 but not of 11/295/33, it was given the wCD8a designation. The reactivity of the other two new mAbs in the T9 cluster with the various subsets of CD8⁺ lymphocytes were distinct from that of the other members in this cluster including the standards. Although the characteristic porcine CD8 staining pattern consisting of CD8^low and CD8^high cells was obtained with the mAb UCP1H12-2, a wider gap between the fluorescence intensity of the CD8^low and CD8^high lymphocytes was observed. In contrast, the mAb PG164A, not only exclusively reacted with CD4⁻/CD8^high lymphocytes, but it also failed to recognize CD4/CD8 double positive lymphocytes. It was concluded that this mAb is specific for a previously unrecognized CD8 epitope, and was, thus, given the wCD8c designation. A very similar reactivity pattern to that of PG164A was observed for two other mAbs (STH106, #094; and SwNL554.1, #009). Although these two mAbs were not originally positioned in the T cell subgroup because of their reactivity and their ability to inhibit the binding of PG164A, they were given the wCD8c designation. Overall, five new wCD8 mAbs were identified. Although the molecular basis for the differences in PBL recognition by these mAbs is not yet understood, they will be important in defining the role of CD8⁺ lymphocyte subsets in health and disease.     

Summary of workshop findings for porcine B-cell markers.

Based on cluster groups from the first-round analyses of the Third International Swine CD Workshop, 38 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) including eight internal controls were analysed by flow cytometry (FCM) and immunohistochemistry (IH) in the second-round analysis of the B-cell section of this workshop. Targets in this section included peripheral blood lymphocytes and cells isolated from ileal Peyer's patches (PP), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) of adult animals, bone marrow cells from newborn piglets and thymus cells isolated from foetuses at day 105 of gestation.Immunohistochemistry of these 38 MAbs identified four sets, whose ligands were co-expressed with CD21, which showed a tissue distribution compatible with specificity for cells including those of the B-cell lineage. Another group of miscellaneous antibodies appeared to identify other cells, several antibodies were negative. Two-colour flow cytometry (2C-FCM) was carried out by pairing each antibody of interest with antibodies to SWC7, CD21, sIgM and a polyclonal rabbit anti-swine immunoglobulin antiserum (RaSwIg).The anti-CD21 MAb BB6-11C9 (no. 20) and IAH-CC51 (no. 19), established in previous workshops, as well as the cross-reactive anti-human CD21 B-1y4 (no. 146), clustered together in FCM analyses of the first round and showed similar cellular distribution in IH. A further cluster was formed by the standard CC55 (no. 55) and 2A10/8 (no. 102) submitted as SWC7 specific. The second SWC7 standard 2F6/8 (no. 100) clustered separately, but IH showed an identical pattern of reactivity to the other SWC7 MAb.Unfortunately, this work could not identify any other novel clusters with specificity for B-cells, as the statistical clustering of other MAbs could not be substantiated by IH or subsequent two-colour-FCM work. However, we could identify MAb with similar cellular distribution. The ligands for the cross-reactive anti-human CD40 G28.5 (no. 25) and STH224 (no. 153) were expressed on very similar targets, similarly the ligands for the MAb pair JM1H1 (no. 139) with BB6-10A10 (no. 142) and the MAb pair 3F7/11 (no. 115) with 1C2F10 (no. 187).     

Analysis of monoclonal antibodies that recognize γδ T/null cells

Thirty two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the first round of analysis in the Second International Swine CD Workshop were placed together with additional mAb derived from the first workshop in the null cell panel for further evaluation. Preparations of peripheral blood leukocytes, concanavalin A stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and spleen cells were used in flow cytometric analyses. Nineteen mAbs identified molecules that were not expressed on null cells, not lineage specific, or recognized activation molecules. Sixteen mAbs including control mAbs were identified that were specific for null cells. One of the latter mAbs, 041 (PGBL22A), that recognizes a determinant on a constant region of porcine γδ TcR established the majority of null cells are γδ T cells. Use of this mAb in further comparisons demonstrated the γδ T cell population is comprised of two major subpopulations, one negative and one positive for CD2. Two color analyses demonstrated that 11 of the mAbs formed a broad cluster that included control mAbs 188 (MAC320) that defined the CD2 negative SWC6 cluster in the first workshop and mAb 122 (CC101) that might recognize an orthologue of bovine WC1 and nine mAbs that recognize determinants on one or more molecules with overlapping patterns of expression on subsets of CD2⁻ γδ T cells. Two groups of mAbs formed the previously identified subset clusters SWC4 and SWC5. Two new mAbs formed a third subcluster. Three mAbs did not form clusters. Three mAbs predicted to recognize TcR in the first workshop (020 [PT14A], 021 [PT79A], and 022 [MUC127A]) and mAb PGBL22A were shown to immunoprecipitate a 37, 40 kDa heterodimer.     

Leukocyte subsets and specific antibodies in pigs vaccinated with a classical swine fever subunit (E2) vaccine and the attenuated ORF virus strain D1701

Total white blood cell (WBC) counts and percentages of CD4a+, CD8a+, CD5a+, CD45RA+, CD45RC+, wCD21+ and SWC3a+ cells in the peripheral blood of pigs were analysed in this study. Blood samples were collected before and on days 4, 10, 21 and 28 after vaccination. Group 1 pigs were vaccinated with a subunit E2 vaccine (gp E2 32 microg/dose), and Group 2 received a subunit vaccine combined with an attenuated ORF virus strain D1701 10(6.45) TCID50/dose. Control pigs received a placebo. The total WBC count and percentage of particular cell types were within the normal range in vaccinated and control pigs. Although the mechanism of attenuated ORF virus activity is not clear, changes were observed in CD4a+, CD5a+, CD8a+, CD45RA+ and CD45RC+ cells in pigs that received the combination of a subunit vaccine and ORF virus. However, the percentage of wCD21+ and SWC3a+ did not differ significantly from that recorded in pigs given only the subunit vaccine. At days 4 and 10 the number of pigs positive to E2 antibodies was higher in the group that received the subunit vaccine and ORF virus than in pigs vaccinated with the subunit vaccine only. A higher percentage of memory cells (CD45RC+) as well as Th and Tc lymphocytes in pigs that received the ORF virus and the subunit vaccine could be ascribed to a nonspecific influence of the ORF virus on the development (through cognate interactions between T and B cells) and the duration (presumed according to the finding of the clonal expression of memory cells) of humoral immunity (assessed by a higher number of seropositive pigs in this group). This seems likely since the proportion of these cells was found to be lower in the pigs that received E2 vaccine only.     

Characterization of monoclonal antibodies assigned to the CD45 subgroup of the Third International Swine CD Workshop.

As a result of the first-round cluster analysis, a panel of 16 novel monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was assigned for detailed analysis to the CD45 subgroup of the Third International Swine CD Workshop. The specificity of the mAbs was initially determined by examining their reactivity with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells engineered to express individual isoforms of porcine CD45. These analyses indicated that seven of the mAbs (PG77A, PG96A, PG167A, PGB78A, 3C/9, MIL13, NHT 101) recognized the portion of the CD45 molecule encoded by the A exon (CD45RA), while one (MIL15) was specific for that portion encoded by the C exon (CD45RC). In each case, the designation was supported by the demonstration that the molecular weight(s) of the recognized antigen(s) in porcine mononuclear cells, as determined by immunoprecipitation, corresponded to the predicted size(s) according to their specificity. As expected, a similar correlation was obtained for five standard mAbs whose specificity for either common or restricted epitopes of porcine CD45 had been established in previous workshops. Screening of the remaining 174 mAbs that comprised this workshop but were excluded from the CD45 subgroup by cluster analysis failed to detect any additional ones reactive with the porcine CD45-expressing cells.     

Summary of the first round analyses of the Third International Workshop on Swine Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens.

The reactivity of 155 monoclonal antibodies submitted to the Third International Workshop on Swine Leukocyte Differentiation Antigens, together with 41 internal standards, was analysed by flow cytometry on 29 different pig cell targets as well as two human cell targets as a means of establishing suitable panels of monoclonal antibodies for more detailed clustering analyses by the various subsections of the workshop. Results were collected either without further gating, with gating based on FS/SS characteristics or with gating based on the co-expression of a reference antibody in two-colour flow cytometry. The CD or SWC reactivity of the internal standards had been established in previous workshops. Data sets were subsequently analysed by statistical clustering using the Leucocyte Typing Database IV software. The resulting 18 cluster groups were allocated to the appropriate second round sections of the workshop, after reviewing the overall cellular reactivity of each cluster as well as the specificity of known standards which clustered in a group.     

Workshop studies with monoclonal antibodies identifying a novel porcine differentiation antigen, SWC9

Two monoclonal antibodies (mAb) within cluster M4 of the myeloid section of the Second International Swine CD Workshop, C4 (No. 144) and PM18-7 (No. 192), showed reactivity with thymocytes and among cells of myelomonocytic origin with mature macrophages but not with monocytes and granulocytes. Both mAb recognize a protein showing two bands of 205 kDa and 130 kDa under both reducing and non-reducing conditions. Although epitope mapping with these mAb could not be performed, this cluster received the SWC9 designation.     

Characterisation of lymphocyte populations in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and waterbuck (Kobus defassa) with workshop monoclonal antibodies

In order to measure different lymphocyte populations in buffalo (Syncerus caffer) and waterbuck (Kobus defassa), we analysed the monoclonal antibodies from the 1st International Workshop on Leukocyte Antigens in Cattle, Sheep and Goats for suitable cross-reactive reagents. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from three buffalo and three waterbuck were tested with the whole panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) together with some additional antibodies against MHC and Ig. In some clusters almost all antibodies cross-reacted (CD2, CD8), in others almost none cross-reacted (CD4, CD5) and in cluster CD6, mAbs only reacted with buffalo but not waterbuck. Double staining experiments were performed on buffalo PBM with the cross-reacting antibodies, to confirm that they detected similar cell populations as in bovine PBM. This was shown with reagents against CD2, CD4, CD6, CD8, CD11, WC1, WC3 and Ig. The molecular weights of the buffalo antigens correlated well with those of the homologous cattle antigens. In the CD5 cluster, only one mAb reacted with the two wild species, and defined an unusual CD2+ CD5- cell population in buffalo. Also mAbs cross-reacting with buffalo MHC class II detected unusual expression on resting T cells. From the results presented, it is clear that the workshop panel contains mAbs against the most important T and B cell antigens of buffalo and probably waterbuck, which will allow us to compare functional lymphocyte populations in cattle and wild ruminants.     

Summary of workshop findings for porcine T-lymphocyte-specific monoclonal antibodies.

Fifty-seven monoclonal antibodies (mAb) selected after the first round analyses in the Third International Swine CD workshop for their possible reactivity with T-lymphocyte specific antigens were further analysed in a second round. As target cells for flow cytometric analyses served peripheral blood mononuclear cells, nylon-wool enriched T-lymphocytes, thymocytes, splenocytes, and lymphocytes derived from Peyer's patches. These second round analyses revealed 15 different data sets. Together with 22 pre-selected data sets from the first round analyses with the whole panel of monoclonal antibodies, 37 data sets were used for the clustering of the respective mAb. Using the LTDB4 program, 19 preliminary clusters could be defined. Two clusters (C3 and C7) with 4 mAb showed no labelling of resting T-lymphocytes. Seven clusters (C1, C2, C4, C5, C6, C11, and C12) contain mAb (in total: 16 mAb) directed against subsets of CD4(-)CD8(-) T-lymphocytes. These mAb seem to recognise antigens on porcine T-lymphocytes with T-cell receptor (TcR) gamma/delta chains. Three clusters (C8, C9, C10, C13) seem to be artificial. They contain either mAb staining CD4(-)CD8(-) T-lymphocytes and low CD8+ cells (C8, C9), mAb with various reactivity (C10) and mAb with known differences in their reactivity (C13). Cluster C14 contains 3 mAb against the CD4a-epitope, C15 describes mAb directed against porcine CD8c-epitope whereas mAb against CD8a and CD8b-epitopes grouped in C19. The mAb found in C16 seem to recognise CD45R. Cluster C17 is composed of different standards directed against CD2, CD3, CD5 and wCD6. Two additional mAb recognising the CD2a-epitope could be enclosed. C18 contains two mAb directed against SWC2.     

Proportions and phenotypic expression of peripheral blood leucocytes in pigs vaccinated with an attenuated C strain and a subunit E2 vaccine against classical swine fever

The influence of an attenuated classical swine fever virus C strain vaccine and a subunit E2 vaccine against classical swine fever on the peripheral blood leucocyte proportion and phenotypic expression in 12-week-old pigs was studied. The C strain was amplified in minipig kidney cell culture and final product contained 10(4 +/- 0.15) TCID50/ml, while the subunit vaccine contained 32 microg per dose of gp E2. Haematological findings showed that the vaccines did not cause leucopenia or lymphocytopenia and the number of neutrophils and eosinophils during the observation period was within physiological range. The results of the proportion of CD4a+, CD5a+, CD8a+, wCD21+, CD45RA+, CD45RC+ , non-T non-B, SWC3a+ and CD11b+ cells were gained by single-colour flow cytometry. At the end of the trial a significantly increase of percentage of CD4+, CD5a+, CD8+, wCD21+ cells has been found in pigs that received the subunit vaccine and the percentage of CD4+, CD5a+, CD8+, CD45RA+ and CD45RC+ cells was higher in pigs that received the attenuated vaccine. Twenty-eight days after vaccination the percentage of CD4+, CD45RA+ and CD45RC+ was significantly higher in pigs vaccinated with the C strain than in pigs vaccinated with the subunit vaccine. In contrary, the percentage of the wCD21- cells was higher in pigs that received the subunit vaccine. Statistically higher values of SWC3a+ and lower values of CD11b+ cells was observed in pigs that received the attenuated vaccine than in pigs vaccinated with the subunit vaccine. Taken altogether, our results showed that the subunit vaccine produced a better stimulation of B cells and CD11b+ monocytes/macrophages /granulocytes/NK cells, whereas the attenuated vaccine induced a higher response of Th cells, naive/memory cells and macrophages/neutrophils. Thus, both vaccines were able to influence the porcine immune system, by activating different subsets of the immune effector/accessory cells.     

Monoclonal antibodies putatively recognising activation and differentiation antigens.

In the activation/maturation section, 46 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were analysed using freshly isolated as well as mitogen activated and recall antigen re-stimulated cells. A total of 10 internal standards as well as 6 antibodies with established reactivity for human cells, reported to cross-react with porcine leukocytes, were included in the panel. The standard antibodies were anti-CD25, CD44, CD45, SLA II, SWC1, SWC2, SWC7 and SWC8 reagents. The test panel contained antibodies with putative reactivity to CD25, SLA II and other mAbs directed against ill-defined targets. Single and double colour surface staining was performed in the attempt to group the mAbs tested into clusters of differentiation. Five new anti-class II reagents, two directed to SLA-DQ and three to SLA-DR, could be added to the previously established ones. One new anti-CD25 as well as two new antibodies with SWC7 and SWC8 specificities, respectively, could also be added to the previously established ones. The identity of the two latter antibodies was also confirmed in other sections of this workshop (B-cell section for SWC7 antibodies and myeloid section for the SWC8 antibodies). The antibody JM2F12, in our hands, has shown strong similarities to the cross-reactive anti human-CD49f reagent. No other clusters were identified, as all remaining antibodies behaved in a different way on different target leukocyte populations. The second purpose of the section was fulfilled: interesting staining profiles of several antibodies on differentiating lymphocytes were recorded and are discussed here.     

Summary of workshop findings for porcine myelomonocytic markers.

About 65 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) including 17 internal controls were analyzed for their ability to recognize and bind to various cells of the myelomonocytic lineage. Flow cytometry (FCM) utilizing both single and double staining, and immunoprecipitation (IP) assays were used in the analysis. About 38 of the mAb were reactive with myelomonocytic cells, resulting in nine clusters of interest. Although the exact identity of many of the molecules on the cells bound by the mAb remains undetermined, information obtained about the mAb analyzed in this workshop should be helpful in further identifying various populations of myelomonocytic cells and their stages of differentiation. Out of 12 mAbs with potential CD11 specificity, seven were assigned to three different swine specific alpha chains of the CD11/CD18 integrin heterodimer, the assignment of the remaining four was tentative. One antibody had a binding specificity consistent with SWC3 and one with SWC8. CD14 expression on pig cells was characterized with a panel of CD14-positive antibodies, two of these antibodies were assigned to swine CD14. Two antibodies were assigned to CD163. Further work is required to determine the antigens recognized by many of the other mAb.     

Definition of the specificity of monoclonal antibodies against porcine CD45 and CD45R: report from the CD45/CD45R and CD44 subgroup of the Second International Swine CD Workshop

Swine cell binding analyses of a set of 48 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including eleven standards, assigned to the CD44 and CD45 subset group of the Second International Swine CD Workshop yielded 13 clusters. Although none of these corresponded to CD44, seven mAbs formed a cluster which was identified as being specific for restricted epitopes of CD45 (CD45R). In addition, a T-cell subset specific cluster comprised of four mAbs was also identified. Two mAbs (STH106 and SwNL 554.1) reacted exclusively with CD8 bright lymphocytes, the other two (2B11 and F01G9) with a subset of CD4 lymphocytes. The other 10 clusters were either specific for MHC-class I like molecules or overlapped with clusters identified by the adhesion molecule subgroup and are therefore just briefly discussed in this report. The specificity of all the mAbs in the CD45R cluster was verified by their ability to immunoprecipitate distinct proteins and to react with CHO cells expressing individual isoforms of CD45. Three CD45R mAbs (3a56, MIL5, −a2) did react with a 210 kDa isoform(s), while another three (STH267, FG2F9, 6E3/7) only recognized a 226 kDa isoform(s). The remaining one (MAC326) precipitated both a 210 and 226 kDa protein. The specificity of all the mAbs in the CD45R cluster, and of the CD45 common mAbs, was confirmed by their reactivity with CHO cells transfected with cDNAs encoding the extracellular and transmembrane portions of distinct CD45R isoforms. Those mAbs recognizing a 210 kDa protein reacted with CHO cells expressing the CD45RC isoform, while those capable of precipitating a 226 kDa, but not the 210 kDa, polypeptide recognized CHO cells expressing either the CD45RAC and the relatively rare CD45RA isoform. MAC326 was unique in its inability to react with CHO cells engineered to produce the CD45RC and CD45RAC isoforms. Thus, three mAbs (6E3/7, STH267, and FG2F9) appear to be specific for an epitope(s) encoded by the A exon, while one (MAC326) recognizes a determinant encoded by the C exon. The remaining three mAbs (3a56, −a2, MIL5) are apparently specific for an epitope(s) which results from the fusion of the C exon to the invariant leader sequence and is destroyed by inclusion of the A exon. All three CD45 common mAbs, K252.1E4, MAC323 and 74.9.3, did react with the CHO cells lines expressing either the CD45RA, CD45RC, CD45RAC or CD45RO isoforms, but not with untransfected CHO cells. When the natural expression of CD45 isoforms was examined by reacting lymphocytes with CD45R mAbs, a high level expression of isoforms containing the A exon-generated domain was detected in all B cells while the majority of CD4⁺ T cells had undetectable or lower expression density of this protein than B cells. In contrast, the density of expression of the CD45 isoform(s) containing the C exon-generated domain ranged from undetectable to high in CD4⁺ T cells whereas the amounts were approximately ten-fold lower in B cells. Overall this panel of CD45 mAbs will be very useful in analyzing the maturation and differentiation of swine lymphoid cells subsets.     

Analyses of monoclonal antibodies reacting with porcine CD3: results from the Second International Swine CD Workshop

Among the 57 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) analyzed within the T-cell group from the Second Swine CD Workshop, six mAb fell within clusters T10 and T11 (No. 088, STH164; No. 148, FY1A3; No. 149, FY2C1; No. 150, FY1H2; No. 151, FY2A11; No. 169, BB23-8E6). The mAb within these two groups gave a similar appearance on flow cytometry and stained all peripheral blood T-cells as defined by CD4 and wCD8 staining. All six mAb precipitated a 24 kDa protein. On the basis of inhibition analyses performed as part of the workshop and from published data, the mAb define at least three epitopes. There is only minimal stimulation of resting peripheral lymphocytes, but four of the mAb produce strong stimulation in the presence of PMA. With the exception of STH164, all have been shown to react with CD3-transfected COS cells. The new mAb, therefore, react with three epitopes on porcine CD3 designated CD3a (BB23-8E6, FY2A11), CD3b (FY1A3, FY2C1), and CD3c (FY1H2). mAb STH164 appears to be reactive with another epitope, however, since its reactivity with CD3 has not been confirmed it is designated as wCD3.