The effect of forage type and level of concentrate supplementation on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows in early lactation

Abstract In 1993 and 1994, 40 cows in early lactation in early spring were assigned randomly to four feeding treatments. One group of cows was kept indoors with access to grass silage ad libitum, plus 6 kg of concentrate daily. The other three groups had access to grass pasture (5–6 h per day in 1993 and 11–12 h per day in 1994) plus grass silage similar to that fed to the previous group while indoors plus 6, 4 or 2 kg of concentrate daily. The average daily allocations of herbage (> 3·5 cm) were 8·5 and 14·0 kg DM cow^?1 day^?1 in 1993 and 1994 respectively. The treatments were applied for 8 weeks (26 February to 23 April) in 1993, and 7 weeks (11 March to 29 April) in 1994. Cows with access to pasture had lower (P < 0·001) silage dry‐matter (DM) intakes and higher (P < 0·001) total forage DM intakes in both years than those kept indoors. This resulted in significantly higher yields of milk, fat, protein and lactose. Similarly, milk protein concentration was higher (P < 0·05 in 1993; P < 0·001 in 1994). There was a significant linear increase in total DM intake in both years with increased concentrate supplementation. In 1993, there was a linear increase in milk (P < 0·01), fat (P < 0·01), protein (P < 0·001) and lactose (P < 0·01) yields with increased concentrate supplementation. In 1994, only milk protein yield (P < 0·05) was increased. Concentrate supplementation had no effect on milk composition or liveweight change. Cows with access to grazed grass had higher liveweight gains (P < 0·05) than those kept indoors in both years. In 1993, increasing the energy intake increased the processing qualities of the milk produced. The results showed that access to grass pasture resulted in higher milk production, in reduced silage requirement and in reduced level of concentrate supplementation required for a given level of milk production with spring‐calving cows in early lactation compared with those kept indoors.     

Comparison of the performance of dairy cows offered kale,swedes and perennial ryegrass herbage in situ and perennial ryegrass silage fed indoors in late pregnancy during winter in Ireland

The effects on the performance of dairy cows offered kale, swedes, and perennial ryegrass in situ and perennial ryegrass silage fed indoors to dairy cows pre‐partum during winter in Ireland was examined. Eighty‐eight spring‐calving dairy cows were randomly assigned to one of four offered treatments; (i) 8 kg of dry matter (DM) of kale leaf and stem + 4 kg DM of perennial ryegrass silage (treatment K), (ii) 8 kg DM of the root and leaf of swedes + 4 kg DM of perennial ryegrass silage (treatment S), (iii) 12 kg DM of perennial ryegrass herbage (treatment G) offered in situ and (iv) perennial ryegrass silage offered ad libitum indoors (treatment ID). Cows on treatments K, S and ID had a greater (P < 0·001) increase in body condition score (0·20, 0·14 and 0·50 units respectively) pre‐partum than cows on treatment G which lost 0·22 units. Pre‐partum treatment had no effect on variables of milk production in the following lactation. In the first 100 d of lactation, cows on treatment G pre‐partum had a lower milk fat concentration (35·6 g kg^?1) compared with cows on treatments S and ID (38·3 and 39·3 g kg^?1 respectively). There was no effect of treatment on the intervals between parturition and first insemination (mean 74·6 d) and conception (mean 96·1 d). The results suggest that offering kale and swedes to dairy cows pre‐partum resulted in a similar lactation performance to dairy cows grazing a perennial ryegrass sward or offered perennial ryegrass silage indoors.     

A short-term comparison of the performance of four grassland-based systems of milk production for autumn-calving dairy cows

Eighty winter‐calving dairy cows of mixed parity were managed in four grassland‐based systems of milk production (F‐F, F‐C, C‐F and C‐C) over a full lactation (year 1) and during the winter period of the subsequent lactation (year 2). During the winter periods cows on systems F‐F and F‐C were offered silages of high feeding value, supplemented with 6·0 kg d^?1 of concentrate [crude protein (CP), 307 g kg^?1 dry matter (DM)] through an out‐of‐parlour feeding system, while cows on systems C‐F and C‐C were offered silages of medium feeding value, supplemented with c. 12·8 kg d^?1 of concentrate (CP, 204 g kg^?1 DM), in the form of a complete diet. After 25 February in year 1, cows on systems F‐F and C‐F were given access to grazing for periods of increasing duration, achieving full turnout on 17 April. Thereafter, until 21 October, these cows were offered a high daily allowance of herbage within a flexible grazing system (23·0 kg DM per cow, measured above a height of 4·0 cm), supplemented with 0·5 kg d^?1 of a ‘high magnesium’ concentrate. Cows on systems F‐C and C‐C (year 1) commenced grazing on 1 April, achieving full turnout on 17 April. Thereafter, until 20 October, these cows were managed on a restricted allowance of herbage in a rotational paddock grazing system, with concentrates (average allocation, 3·9 kg d^?1) being offered according to yield. In year 2, cows on systems F‐F and C‐F were given access to grazing for periods of increasing duration, from 11 March to 8 April, at which point the study was terminated. With systems F‐F, F‐C, C‐F and C‐C, mean feed inputs and milk outputs (per animal) during year 1 of the study were as follows: total concentrate DM intakes [881, 1272, 1729 and 2171 kg (s.e.m. 96·1)]; total silage DM intakes [1722, 1713, 1047 and 1154 kg (s.e.m. 70·7)], total grass DM intakes (3245, 2479, 3057 and 2481 kg) and total milk outputs [7541, 7527, 7459 and 7825 kg (s.e.m. 305·8)] respectively. Stocking rates associated with each of the four systems were 2·2, 2·5, 2·6 and 2·9 cows per hectare respectively. Performance of dairy cows on the systems during the winter of year 2 was similar to that recorded during year 1. The results of this study indicate that similar levels of milk output, DM intakes, tissue changes and plasma metabolite profiles can be achieved from grassland‐based systems involving very different combinations of grass silage, grazed grass and concentrate feeds.     

Effects of grass pasture and concentrate-based feeding systems for spring-calving dairy cows in early spring on performance during lactation

The effect of offering a total mixed ration of silage and concentrate (proportionately 0·44 silage) system [indoor feeding system (IF)] was compared with grazing at a high daily herbage allowance with a low level of concentrate supplementation [early grazing system (EG)] in early spring on the performance of spring‐calving dairy cows in Ireland. Sixty‐four spring‐calving Holstein–Friesian dairy cows (mean calving date, 2 February) were allocated to one of two systems between 16 February and 4 April 2004. An equal number of primiparous and multiparous cows were assigned to each system. The dairy cows on the IF system were housed for a 7‐week period and offered a diet of 10·9 kg DM cow^?1 d^?1 (s.d. 2·3) of concentrate, the remainder of the diet was 8·6 kg DM cow^?1 d^?1 (s.d. 1·9) of grass silage. The dairy cows on the EG system were offered a mean daily herbage allowance of 15·1 kg DM cow^?1 d^?1 (s.d. 3·7) and were supplemented with 3·0 kg DM cow^?1 d^?1 (s.d. 1·0) of concentrate. There was no difference in milk yield between the two systems but the cows in the EG system had a higher milk protein concentration (2·9 g kg^?1) and a higher milk protein yield than in the IF system. Milk fat concentration was higher for cows in the IF than EG system (3·0 g kg^?1). There was no difference in total daily dry‐matter intake between the systems, measured in week 6 of the study. Mean live weight of the cows in the IF system was greater than in the EG system. The results of the study suggest that a slightly greater performance can be achieved by a system offering a high daily herbage allowance to spring‐calving dairy cows in early lactation compared with a system offering a total mixed ration containing a high proportion of concentrate with grass silage.     

Mixing whole-crop pea–oat silage and grass–clover silage: positive effects on intake and milk production of dairy cows

Forty‐eight high‐yielding dairy cows of the Swedish Red breed were used to examine the effects of providing pea–oat silage (P), grass–clover silage (G) and a 0·50:0·50 mixture of the silages (M) ad libitum in diets with two concentrate levels (7 or 10 kg d^?1). A 9‐week experiment, including a 2‐week pre‐experimental period in which the cows were all fed the same diet, and an in vivo apparent digestibility study were conducted comparing the six dietary treatments (M7, M10, P7, P10, G7, G10). Intake and digestibility of the diets and milk production and live weight of the cows were measured. The G silage [11·3 MJ ME kg^?1 dry matter (DM)] was first‐cut grass herbage wilted for 24 h prior to addition of an additive, containing formic acid, propionic acid and ammonia, at 4 L t^?1 fresh matter (FM). The P forage was cut when the peas were at pod fill and ensiled directly with 6 L t^?1 FM of the same additive. The main hypothesis tested, that cows fed the M silage would produce more milk than the cows fed either the P or the G silages, was confirmed. The cows fed the M7 dietary treatment had similar milk yield and milk composition to cows offered the M10, G10 and P10 dietary treatments, and cows offered the G7 and P7 dietary treatments had lower milk and milk protein yields. This suggested that a mixed ration of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage has a concentrate‐sparing effect, and that the use of pea–oat bi‐crop and grass–clover silage as a mixed ration for high‐yielding dairy cows can be recommended.     

An evaluation of the effects of grazing management systems involving preferential treatment of high-yielding dairy cows on animal performance and sward utilization

Two systems of grazing management involving preferential treatment of high- yielding dairy cows were compared with a grazing system in which both high- and low-yielders received uniform treatment. Cows were rotationally grazed across I-day paddocks without concentrate supplementation from 23 April to 8 October 1985, with a mean stocking rate over the season of 5-4 cows ha^?1. Preferential treatment of high-yielding cows was achieved either by using a leader/follower approach (LF) with high-yielding cows in the leader group, or by preferential forage feeding (PFF) where high-yielding cows were allowed access to grass silage for 1 -5 h daily and grazed alongside low-yielders. Control (C) cows grazed together as a single group. The high grazing stocking rates used on all three treatments resulted in good grass utilization with residual sward heights, assessed by a rising-plate sward stick, of 45, 50 and 48 mm for the LF, PFF and C treatments respectively. Animal performance data for the LF, PFF and C treatments respectively were: milk yield (kg d^?1) 15middot;1, 15middot;6 and 14middot;7 (s.e. 0middot;78); milk fat yield (g d^?1) 598, 606 and 567 (s.e. 34); milk protein yield (g d^?1) 500, 519 and 480 (s.e. 31); and live weight gain (kg d^?1) 0middot;12, 0middot;23 and 0middot;25 (s.e. 0·05). These results indicate that leader/follower grazing had little overall effect on animal performance when high grazing severity was imposed, with the improvement in animal performance of high-yielding cows in the leader group being offset by the reduced performance of the follower group. Buffer-feeding of high-yielding, rotationally-grazed cows with high-quality grass silage had little effect on animal performance and resulted in a decrease in the efficiency of grassland utilization. Silage appeared to substitute for herbage, with a reduction in herbage DM intake of 0middot;55 kg per kg silage DM consumed.     

The effects of incorporating small quantities of straw in grass/grass silage-based diets for dairy cows

Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of incorporating small quantities of straw in the diets of dairy cows. In Experiment 1, forty Holstein Friesian dairy cows were used in a 2 × 4 factorial design experiment, with factors examined consisting of two parities (primiparous and multiparous animals) and four levels of straw inclusion in the diet (0, 0·08, 0·16 and 0·24 of forage dry matter). The basal forage offered in this study was grass silage, and the primiparous and multiparous animals were supplemented with 9·0 and 11·0 kg concentrate d^–1 respectively. In Experiment 2, forty‐eight Holstein Friesian dairy cows were used in a 2 × 3 factorial design experiment, with factors examined consisting of two basal forage types (grass silage and zero‐grazed grass) and three levels of straw inclusion (0, 1·0 and 2·0 kg d^–1). All animals were offered 7·0 kg d^–1 of a concentrate supplement. Both experiments were partially balanced changeover designs, consisting of two, 4‐week periods. In Experiment 1, the total dry‐matter intake followed a significant quadratic relationship (P < 0·05), increasing with low levels of straw inclusion and decreasing at higher levels of inclusion. With increasing levels of straw inclusion, there was a linear decline in milk yield (P < 0·001) and milk protein concentration (P < 0·05), but milk fat concentration was unaffected (P > 0·05). In Experiment 2, the effect of straw inclusion on total dry‐matter intake was quadratic (P < 0·001), with intakes being maximum at the 1·0‐kg level of straw inclusion. Milk yield exhibited a linear decrease (P < 0·001) with increasing level of straw inclusion. Milk fat concentration was lowest at the 1·0 kg rate of straw inclusion (P < 0·05), but milk protein concentration was unaffected by straw inclusion. There were no significant interactions between basal forage type and level of straw inclusion for any of the variables examined (P > 0·05). Despite small increases in total dry‐matter intake at a low level of straw inclusion, there was no evidence that straw inclusion improved either nutrient utilization or animal performance. The reduction in milk yield observed with straw inclusion reflects, to a large extent, a reduction in metabolizable energy intake.     

Dairy cow performance and labour inputs associated with two silage feeding systems

Two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of two winter feeding systems on the performance of dairy cows in early lactation. Experiments 1 (144 d duration) and 2 (146 d duration) involved sixty‐four (primiparous) and eighty‐six (primiparous and multiparous) Holstein Friesian dairy cows respectively. Rations offered comprised grass silage, maize silage [0·26–0·29 of forage dry matter (DM)] and concentrates (10–12 kg d^?1). With the complete diet (treatment CD), the forage and concentrate components were mixed using a complete diet mixer wagon, and offered daily in the form of a ‘complete diet’. With the easy feed (treatment EF), the dairy cows were offered the forage component of the ration twice weekly in whole blocks, in quantities sufficient for the following 3‐ or 4‐d period, while the concentrate component of the diet was offered via electronic out‐of‐parlour feeding stations. Total DM intakes were similar, namely 17·6 and 17·0 kg d^?1 (Experiment 1) and 18·7 and 18·5 kg d^?1 (Experiment 2), for treatments CD and EF respectively. Feeding system had no significant effect on milk yield, milk fat or milk protein content, or on end of study indices of body tissue reserves in either experiment (P > 0·05). Similarly, feeding system had no significant effect on the digestibility of the ration measured in Experiment 2 (P > 0·05). Feeding times associated with each component of the two feeding systems were measured, and these were then used to calculate total feeding time for a 97‐cow dairy herd. Calculated feeding times for this herd were 209·3 and 156·0 min week^?1 for treatments CD and EF respectively.     

Effect of replacing time available for grazing with time available for eating maize silage and soyabean meal on milk yield and feeding behaviour in dairy cows

Low rates of herbage dry matter (DM) intake impose limits on total daily DM intake in grazing dairy cows. The objective of this study was to increase total daily DM intake and milk production by restricting daily time available for grazing (TAG) and replacing it with time available for eating a maize silage/soyabean meal (TAMS) diet indoors. The treatments (TAG + TAMS) were 20 + 0, 19 + 1, 10 + 10 and 5 + 15 h. Measurements were made of milk production, intake and feeding behaviour. The interactions of TAG + TAMS treatments with sward height (SH) and concentrate level (CL) were also examined. Two experiments, each lasting 42 days, were carried out in spring ( Experiment 1 ) and autumn ( Experiment 2 ) using forty‐eight and twenty‐four Holstein‐Friesian cows respectively. Treatments were arranged in a factorial design with TAG + TAMS treatments, SH ( Experiment 1 only) and CL as the independent variables and a TAG + TAMS of 20 h. Reducing TAG and increasing TAMS significantly reduced estimated herbage DM intake and significantly increased maize silage/soyabean meal intake in both experiments, but there were no significant main effects of TAG + TAMS treatments on milk yield (mean, 27·4 and 25·5 kg d^?1 for Experiments 1 and 2 respectively), and yield of milk constituents. Increasing SH ( Experiment 1 ) and CL ( Experiments 1 and 2 ) significantly increased milk yield. In Experiment 1 , there was a significant interaction between TAG + TAMS treatments and SH with the taller sward height of 8–10 cm and the 20 + 0 treatment having the highest milk yield (29·7 kg d^?1) and the 5 + 15 treatment the lowest (27·2 kg d^?1), whereas at the lower sward height of 4–6 cm, milk yield was lowest on the 20 + 0 treatment (25·5 kg d^?1) with the other three treatments being higher (mean, 26·9 kg d^?1). Replacing TAG with TAMS significantly increased liveweight gain in Experiment 1 but not in Experiment 2 . Estimated rates of intake of herbage were lower in the autumn experiment ( Experiment 2 , 9·6 g DM min ^?1) than in the spring experiment ( Experiment 1 , 29·4 g DM min ^?1) but rates of intake of maize silage were higher in the autumn (112·4 g DM min^?1) than in the spring (72·5 g DM min^?1). In conclusion, in spring the response to replacing TAG with TAMS was dependent on sward conditions with the highest milk fat plus protein yield being on the 20 + 0 treatment at the high sward height and on the 19 + 1 treatment at the low sward height. The high liveweight gain of the 5 + 15 treatment could be an important means of restoring body condition in grazing lactating cows. In autumn, intakes of herbage were low in spite of its high estimated nutritive value with all treatments having a similar level of performance.     

A comparison of two grassland-based systems for autumn-calving dairy cows of high genetic merit

A full lactation study compared the performance of autumn‐calving dairy cows of high genetic merit under two contrasting systems of milk production: high forage (HF) and high concentrate (HC). During the winter, animals on system HF were offered a silage with a high feeding value characteristics, supplemented with 5·5 kg of concentrate [crude protein content of 280 g kg^?1 dry matter (DM)] through an out‐of‐parlour feeding system. From 14 March, these animals were given increasing access to grazing, achieving 24‐h turnout on 15 April. Thereafter, until day 305 of lactation, these animals were offered a large daily herbage allowance (23·0 kg grass DM cow^?1, measured above a height of 4·0 cm), supplemented with 0·5 kg d^?1 of a ‘high‐magnesium’ concentrate. During the winter, animals on system HC were offered a silage of medium feeding value, mixed with ≈14·0 kg of concentrate d^?1 (crude protein content of 202 g kg^?1 DM) in the form of a complete diet. These animals commenced grazing on 9 April, achieving 24‐h turnout on 18 April. From 18 April until 9 June, daily herbage allowances and concentrate feed levels were 17·0 kg DM and 5·0 kg respectively; thereafter, and until day 305 of lactation, these daily allowances were reduced to 15·0 kg of herbage DM and 4·0 kg of concentrate. Animal performance during the first 305 days of lactation for systems HF and HC, respectively, were as follows: total concentrate DM inputs, 842 and 2456 kg; total silage DM intakes, 2205 and 1527 kg; total grass DM intakes, 3019 and 2044 kg; total feed DM intake, 6061 and 6032 kg and total milk output, 7854 and 8640 kg. Total milk output per cow with system HF was 786 kg lower than for system HC, despite similar total DM intakes, suggesting a greater total nutrient requirement with the former to support a given milk production. However, the study confirms that relatively similar levels of animal performance can be achieved from systems based on very different sources of nutrient supply.     

Effect of grazing management on herbage protein concentration,milk production and nitrogen excretion of dairy cows in mid‐lactation

The objective of this experiment was to use diurnal and temporal changes in herbage composition to create two pasture diets with contrasting ratios of water‐soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP) and compare milk production and nitrogen‐use efficiency (NUE) of dairy cows. A grazing experiment using thirty‐six mid‐lactation Friesian x Jersey cows was conducted in late spring in Canterbury, New Zealand. Cows were offered mixed perennial ryegrass and white clover pastures either in the morning after a short 19‐day regrowth interval (SR AM) or in the afternoon after a long 35‐day regrowth interval (LR PM). Pasture treatments resulted in lower pasture mass and greater herbage CP concentration (187 vs. 171 g kg^?1 DM) in the SR AM compared with the LR PM but did not affect WSC (169 g kg^?1 DM) or the ratio of WSC/CP (1·0 g g^?1). Cows had similar apparent DM (17·5 kg DM cow^?1 d^?1) and N (501 g N cow^?1 d^?1) intake for both treatments. Compared with SR AM cows, LR PM cows had lower milk (18·5 vs. 21·2 kg cow^?1 d^?1), milk protein (0·69 vs. 0·81 kg cow^?1 d^?1) and milk solids (1·72 and 1·89 kg cow^?1 d^?1) yield. Urinary N concentration was increased in SR AM, but estimated N excretion and NUE for milk were similar for both treatments. Further studies are required to determine the effect of feeding times on diurnal variation in urine volume and N concentration under grazing to predict urination events with highest leaching risk.     

The effects of a flexible grazing management strategy and leader/follower grazing on the milk production of grazing dairy cows and on sward characteristics

An experiment was carried out during 1984 to examine the effects of three alternative grazing strategies for January/February calved British Friesian dairy eows on sward and animal production. Cows were rotationally grazed across 1 d paddocks without concentrate supplementation from 30 April to 1 October. A flexible grazing (EG) treatment involved manipulating residual herbage height, as assessed by a rising-plate sward stick, with cows initially grazing to 80 mm, reducing to 60 mm when milk yield declined below 20 kg d^?1 and finally to 50 mm when milk yield declined below 15 kgd^?1. Control (C) cows grazed to a constant residual herbage height of 60 mm throughout the season (a 60-inm rising-plate sward stick height is equivalent to a sward surface height of approximately 80 mm). On a further treatment a leader/follower (LF) approach was used, with cows paired for calving date and parity and within pairs allocated to either a high-(leader) or a low-yielding (follower) group, according to milk yield at turnout, with the leader group grazing 1 d ahead of the follower group. Overall stocking rates on C and LE treatments were identical but herbage allowances differed as a result of treatment effects. Animal performance data for the FG, C and LE treatments, respectively, were: milk yield (kg d^?1) 14·5, 14·7 and 16·0 (s.e. 0·59); milk fat yield (g d^?1) 577, 571 and 637 (s.e. 29); milk protein yield (g d^?1) 528, 527 and 576 (s.e. 19); and liveweight gain (kg d^?1) 0·09, 0·20 and 0·14 (s.e. 0·04). Overall, there was no benefit in animal production following lax grazing in spring even with high-yielding cows, and this approach resulted in the accumulation of stem and senescent material in the sward in mid-season. However, preferential treatment of high-yielding cows by grazing as a leader group in a leader-follower system resulted in higher milk production, particularly in late season, with an overall improvement in milk yield for the LF treatment of 9% relative to treatment C.     

The effect of initial spring grazing date and subsequent stocking rate on the grazing management, grass dry matter intake and milk production of dairy cows in summer

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of an early (February; F) or delayed (April; A) primary spring grazing date and two stocking rates, high (H) and medium (M), on the grazing management, dry matter (DM) intake of grass herbage and milk production of spring‐calving dairy cows grazing a perennial ryegrass sward in the subsequent summer. Sixty‐four Holstein‐Friesian dairy cows (mean of 58 d in milk) were assigned to one of four grazing treatments (n = 16) which were imposed from 12 April to 3 July 2004. Cows on the early spring‐grazing treatment were grazed at 5·5 cows ha^?1 (treatment FH) and 4·5 cows ha^?1 (treatment FM) while cows on the late‐grazing treatment were grazed at 6·4 cows ha^?1 (treatment AH) and 5·5 cows ha^?1 (treatment AM). The organic matter digestibility and crude protein concentration of the grass herbage were higher on the early‐grazing treatment than on the late‐grazing treatment. The cows on the FM treatment had significantly (P < 0·001) higher milk (24·5 kg), solids‐corrected milk (22·5 kg), fat (P < 0·01, 918 g) and protein (831 g) yields than the other three treatments. Cows on the FM treatment had a higher (P < 0·001) DM intake of grass herbage by 2·3 kg DM per cow per day than cows on the AH treatment, which had a DM intake significantly lower than all other treatments (15·2 kg DM per cow per day). The results of the present study showed that grazing in early spring has a positive effect on herbage quality in subsequent grazing rotations. The study also concluded that early spring‐grazed swards stocked at a medium stocking rate (4·5 cows ha^?1; FM) resulted in the highest DM intake of grass herbage and milk production.     

Increased concentration of water-soluble carbohydrate in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.): milk production from late-lactation dairy cows

Eight multiparous Holstein–Friesian dairy cows in late lactation were used to investigate the potential of using perennial ryegrass with a high concentration of water‐soluble carbohydrate (WSC) to increase the efficiency of milk production. After a pretreatment period on a common pasture, the cows were each given ad libitum access to one of two varieties of zero‐grazed grass continuously for 3 weeks. Treatments were: high sugar (HS), an experimental perennial ryegrass variety bred to contain high concentrations of WSC; or control, a standard variety of perennial ryegrass (cv. AberElan) containing typical concentrations of WSC. The two grass varieties were matched in terms of heading date. All animals also received 4 kg day^–1 standard dairy concentrate. Grass dry matter (DM) intake was not significantly different between treatments (11·6 vs. 10·7 kg DM day^–1; s.e.d. 0·95 for HS and control diets respectively), although DM digestibility was higher on the HS diet (0·71 vs. 0·64 g g^–1 DM; s.e.d. 0·23; P < 0·01) leading to higher digestible DM intakes for that diet. Milk yield from animals offered the HS diet was higher (15·3 vs. 12·6 kg day^–1; s.e.d. 0·87; P < 0·05) and, although milk constituent concentrations were unaffected by treatment, milk protein yields were significantly increased on the HS diet. The partitioning of feed N was significantly affected by diet, with more N from the HS diet being used for milk production (0·30 vs. 0·23 g milk N g^–1 feed N; s.e.d. 0·012; P < 0·01) and less being excreted in urine (0·25 vs. 0·35; s.e.d. 0·020; P < 0·01). In a separate experiment, using the same grasses harvested earlier in the season, the fractional rate of DM degradation, measured by in situ and gas production techniques, was higher for the HS grass than for the control. It is concluded that increased digestible DM intakes of the HS grass led to increased milk yields, whereas increased efficiency of utilization of the HS grass in the rumen resulted in the more efficient use of feed N for milk production and reduced N excretion.     

The performance of summer-calving cows grazing perennial ryegrass swards

The objectives of this experiment were to study the effects of different grazing managements in spring on herbage intake and performance of summer-calving dairy cows and to examine the effects of regrowth in early June on herbage intake and cow performance. Four spring-grazing treatments were applied to predominantly perennial ryegrass swards: Control (C), sward grazed by cows to 6–8 cm sward surface height (SSH); CG16, sward grazed by cows to 3–4 cm SSH in May and allowed to regrow to a target SSH of 16cm in early June; CG8, sward grazed by cows to 3–4 cm SSH in May and allowed to regrow to 8cm in early June; and SG8, sward grazed by sheep to 2–3 cm SSH in May and allowed to regrow to 8 cm in early June, All swards were continuously stocked by summer-calving (May and July) primiparous and multiparous cows from 16 June to 7 September, to a target SSH of 8–10cm. Spring treatments bad marked effects on herbage intakes and milk production. Estimated in July by n alkane analysis, the mean herbage intake ± s.e.d. of cows on each treatment were 1·8, 1·4, 1·4 and 3·0 ± 0·31 kg dry matter (DM) 100 kg live weight (LW)^?1 d^?1 (P < 0·01) for treatments C, CG16, CG8 and SG8 respectively. Measured in August, intakes were 1·8, 20, 2·1 and 2·4 ± O·33kg DM 100kg LW^?1 d^?1 respectively. Severe spring grazing led to increased milk yield and reduced milk fat content from summer-calving cows fed 5·2 kg d^?1 of a proprietary concentrate. Average milk yields for the eleven experimental cows on each treatment were 24·3, 23·4, 26·2 and 29·0 ± 1·20 kgd^?1 (P < 0·01) for C, CG16, CG8 and SG8, and average milk fat contents were 45·4. 42·4, 43·9 and 40·9 ± 1·02gkg^?1 (P<0·05) respectively. The results suggest that severe grazing of swards in early season could improve herbage intake and milk yield of summer-calving cows in mid- and late season. The most favourable spring treatment in this respect was severe grazing by sheep. However, this advantage could be negated in midseason by lax grazing at that time.     

The effect of concentrate feed level on the response of lactating dairy cows to a constant proportion of fodder beet inclusion in a grass silage-based diet

Abstract The effects of level of concentrate supplementation on the response of dairy cows to grass silage‐based diets containing a constant proportion of fodder beet were examined. Forty Holstein‐Friesian dairy cows of mixed parity were used in a 2 × 5 factorial design experiment. Two basal diet types [grass silage alone or grass silage mixed with fodder beet in a 70:30 dry matter (DM) ratio] were offered ad libitum, and the effects of five levels of concentrate supplementation (mean = 3·0, 5·3, 7·5, 9·8 and 12·0 kg DM per cow d^?1) were examined. Concentrate supplements were offered via an out‐of‐parlour feeding system. These treatments were examined in a three‐period (period length = 4 weeks) partially balanced changeover design experiment. Fodder beet inclusion had no significant effect on the estimated metabolizable energy (ME) concentration of the ration (P > 0·001). Total DM intake, estimated ME intake, milk yield, milk protein content and milk energy output all showed significant linear increases with increasing level of concentrate inclusion (P < 0·001) while, in addition, milk yield and milk energy output exhibited a significant quadratic increase (P < 0·01). The inclusion of fodder beet in the diet reduced silage DM intake (P < 0·01) but resulted in an increase in total DM intake and estimated ME intake (P < 0·001). However, inclusion of fodder beet had no significant effect on milk yield (P > 0·05), while increasing milk protein content and milk energy output (P ≤ 0·05). Milk energy output, as a proportion of estimated ME intake, was significantly (P < 0·001) reduced by fodder beet inclusion (0·44 vs. 0·38). Despite large increases in estimated ME intake with the inclusion of fodder beet at all levels of concentrate supplementation, milk energy output responses were small, resulting in an overall reduction in the efficiency of conversion of ME intake into milk energy output. An increased partitioning of dietary ME intake to tissue gain is suggested as the most likely explanation for the observations made.     

Herbage intake and milk production by grazing dairy cows 2. The effects of level of winter feeding and daily herbage allowance

Two experiments are described in which two levels of winter feeding and three levels of herbage allowance during the grazing season were imposed upon March/April calving British Friesian dairy cows. The winter treatments resulted in differences in live weight and milk yield at turnout of 35 and 53 kg and 3·4 and 3·2 kg d^-1 for the two trials. Subsequently, when grazed at generous herbage allowances, the cows were able to compensate for much of this difference but when herbage was restricted the milk yield differences were accentuated. Groups of cows from each winter treatment were offered 25, 50 or 75 (Experiment 1) and 30, 50 or 70 (Experiment 2) g herbage DM per kg LW daily during the grazing season. Daily herbage intakes on the three allowances in each trial were 14·1, 13·3, 10·7 and 12·5, 12·1, 11·5 kg OM and milk yields were 16·0, 15·3, 12·5 and 15·2, 14·3, 11·8 kg SCM respectively. Both intake and milk production were depressed once the cows were forced to consume more than 50% of herbage on offer or to graze the sward down to a mean height of less than 8–10 cm. Grazing behaviour observations indicated that under rotational managements the cows did not compensate for restrictions in available herbage by grazing longer. Highest levels of milk production per unit area were observed in both trials when production per cow was depressed by 20–25%.     

Nitrogen flows and balances in four grassland‐based systems of dairy production on a clay‐loam soil in a moist temperate climate

This study examined productivity, nitrogen (N) flows and N balances in grassland‐based systems of dairy production in Ireland. There were four stocking densities of dairy cows on grass/white clover pastures and four inputs of N as fertilizers, concentrates and biological fixation over 2 years; 2001 and 2002. Annual stocking densities were 1·75, 2·10, 2·50 and 2·50 cows ha^?1. Associated N inputs were 205, 230, 300 and 400 kg ha^?1 respectively. There were eighteen cows per system. Cows calved within a 12‐week interval in spring with a mean calving date of 28 February and lactation extended until mid‐December in each year. There were no differences in annual milk yield (6337 kg cow^?1; s.e.m. 106·1), live weight or body condition score. Pre‐grazing N concentrations in herbage increased (P < 0·001) with increasing N input, whereas there were no differences in N concentrations in silage reflecting optimum N inputs for silage production. Grazed herbage accounted for 0·64, silage 0·26 and concentrates 0·10 of annual dry matter consumed by the cows. Annual intakes of N ranged from 144 to 158 kg cow^?1 and were mostly influenced by N concentration in grazed herbage. Annual output of N in milk and liveweight change was 38 kg cow^?1 and was not different between systems. Annual N surpluses increased with increasing N inputs from 137 to 307 kg ha^?1, whereas the proportion of N inputs recovered in products declined from 0·34 to 0·24. More efficient N use was associated with lower N inputs and in particular lower N concentrations in grazed herbage.     

Silage intake and milk production in cows given barley supplements of reduced ruminal degradability

Three change-over experiments were conducted to determine the effect on ad libitum silage intake and milk production in dairy cows of treatment of barley supplements with an acid-formaldehyde reagent designed to reduce the rate of starch and protein digestion in the rumen. In Experiment 1 there were six dietary treatments consisting of silage with supplements of 4·0,6·5 and 9·0 kg d^-1 of barley given untreated or treated with formaldehyde reagent (8·1 t^-1). In Experiment 2 there were four dietary treatments consisting of silage with supplements of barley (7·0 kg d^-1) or barley and fishmeal (6·0 kg d^-1 plus 1·0 kg d^-1), with the barley untreated or treated with formaldehyde reagent (15·1t^-1). In Experiment 3 there were four dietary treatments consisting of silage given alone or with supplements of barley (9·0 kg d^-1). Treated barley (15·1 t^-1, 9·0 kg d^-1) and barley plus sodium bicarbonate (9·0 kg d^-1 plus 25·0 g d^-1). Treatment of the barley supplement with formaldehyde reagent had no effect on silage intake or milk production in Experiment 1 where the rate of application of the reagent was low and the basal silage-barley diet was limiting in rumendegradable nitrogen. However, in Experiments 2 and 3 treated barley supplements were associated with improvements in silage intake and milk production. As compared with corresponding control diets containing untreated barley, increases in silage intake ranged from 0 to 0·16 of the control value, whilst associated increases in the yields of milk, milk fat, milk protein and lactose were 0·077–0·089, 0·016–0·026, 0·092–0·118 and 0·080–0·092 of the control value. These responses are discussed in relation to the increases in silage intake and milk production observed with fishmeal supplementation of the diet in Experiment 2 and inclusion of sodium bicarbonate in Experiment 3.     

Nutritive value of barley/kale bi-crop silage for lactating dairy cows

Six mid‐lactation multiparous Holstein–Friesian dairy cows were used to examine the potential of a fermented whole‐crop barley (Hordeum vulgare)/kale (Brassica oleracea) bi‐crop as a feed compared with a first‐cut perennial ryegrass silage. The barley/kale bi‐crop was grown as a strip intercrop, and was harvested and ensiled as an intimate mixture [0·80 barley and 0·20 kale on a dry‐matter (DM) basis]. Animals were offered ad libitum access to one of three experimental diets in a duplicated Latin Square design experiment: (i) Bi‐crop (the barley/kale bi‐crop); (ii) Grass (the grass silage); and (iii) Mix (a 1:1 fresh mixture of Bi‐crop and Grass). All animals also received a standard dairy concentrate at a rate of 4 kg d^?1 in equal portions at each of two milkings. The Bi‐crop and Grass silages contained 346 and 293 g DM kg^?1, 108 and 168 g crude protein kg^?1 DM, 268 and 36 g starch kg^?1 DM, and had pH values of 3·87 and 3·80 respectively. Animals offered the two bi‐crop silage‐containing diets consumed more forage DM than those offered grass silage (14·6, 14·9 and 12·6 kg DM d^?1 for Bi‐crop, Mix and Grass respectively; s.e.d. 0·45, P < 0·01) and yielded more milk (24·0, 23·9, 22·6 kg d^?1 for Bi‐crop, Mix and Grass respectively; s.e.d. 0·26, P < 0·01). However, differences in the partitioning of dietary nitrogen towards milk protein and away from excretion in urine suggest a more efficient (rumen) utilization of feed protein by animals offered diets containing the bi‐crop silage. It is concluded that, despite having a low crude protein concentration, barley/kale bi‐crop silage offers excellent potential as a feed for lactating dairy cows.