GnRH‐agonist deslorelin implant alters the progesterone release pattern during early pregnancy in gilts

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of progesterone (P) and luteinizing hormone (LH) during recognition and establishment of pregnancy in the gilt. Therefore, the effects of eliminating episodic LH pulses on P patterns were determined during early pregnancy. To this end, a slow‐release GnRH implant deslorelin was used for GnRH down‐regulation. A group of gilts (GnRHa, n = 8) was implanted with the GnRH‐agonist on Day 11 of pregnancy, while a control group (C, n = 5) was treated with a non‐impregnated placebo implant. Blood was collected via a vena cava caudalis catheter at 10‐min intervals for 8 hr on Day 16 and 21 of pregnancy. As expected, the GnRH implant reduced LH secretion (p < 0.01) and abolished LH pulses completely at Day 16 and Day 21 of pregnancy. On Day 16, there was no difference in P levels between the treatments. However, on Day 21, the GnRH‐agonist treatment led to significantly increased P concentrations (p < 0.01) compared with the control gilts. Progesterone was secreted in a pulsatile manner in both treatment groups and no relationship between LH pulsatility and P pulsatility was observed. In conclusion, abolishment of LH pulsatility did not affect the pulsatile pattern of P secretion but led to an unexpected overall increase in P on Day 21 of pregnancy; this effect was delayed and occurred 10 days after commencing treatment with the GnRH depot agonist. The elevation of P on Day 21 of pregnancy in the GnRHa group suggests either a reduced negative feedback effect or an increased autocrine response by the corpora lutea.     

Progesterone and Luteinizing hormone secretion patterns in early pregnant gilts

We studied luteinizing hormone (LH) pulsatility and episodic progesterone release of the corpus luteum (CL) on Day 11 and Day 21 in inseminated gilts and aimed to establish a relationship between these two hormones. Blood was collected at 15-min intervals for 12 hr on Days 11, 16 and 21 from a vena cava caudalis catheter. At euthanasia, eight gilts were pregnant and six gilts were not pregnant. Progesterone parameters (basal, mean, pulse frequency and pulse amplitude) did not differ between pregnant and non-pregnant gilts on Day 11, LH pulse frequency and amplitude tended to differ (p = .07 and p = .079). In pregnant gilts, basal and mean progesterone, progesterone pulse amplitude and frequency declined significantly from Day 11 to Day 21 (p < .05). A significant decline was also seen in the LH pulse amplitude from Day 11 to Day 21 (p < .05). None of the LH pulses was followed by a progesterone pulse within 1 hr on Day 21. On Day 11 and Day 21 appeared a synchronicity in the LH pulse pattern, as there were two or three LH pulses in 12 hr and these LH pulses appeared in the same time window. We conclude that on Day 11 and Day 21 of pregnancy in gilts, progesterone pulses do not follow an LH pulse within one hour. Further we demonstrated that the successful or not successful formation of a CL of pregnancy is independent of progesterone release on Day 11 after insemination. We confirmed the decline of progesterone from Day 11 to Day 21 in the vena cava caudalis and could demonstrate that this decline is partly due to lower progesterone pulse amplitude and frequency and that the decline occurs simultaneously with a decline in LH pulse amplitude.     

Ovarian response to pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and porcine pituitary extract in gilts actively immunized against gonadotropin releasing hormone

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of exogenous gonadotropins on follicular development in gilts actively immunized against gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). Four gilts, which had become acyclic after immunization against GnRH, and four control gilts were given 1,000 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG), while four additional control gilts were given saline. Control animals were prepuberal crossbred gilts averaging 100 kg body weight. Control gilts given saline had ovaries containing antral follicles (4 to 6 mm in diameter). Control gilts given PMSG exhibited estrus and their ovaries contained corpora hemorrhagica and corpora lutea. PMSG failed to stimulate follicular growth in gilts immunized against GnRH, and ovaries contained regressed corpora albicantia and small antral follicles (less than 1 mm in diameter). Concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and estradiol-17 beta (E2) were non-detectable in gilts immunized against GnRH and given PMSG. In the second experiment, five gilts actively immunized against GnRH were given increasing doses of PMSG every third day until unilateral ovariectomy on d 50. PMSG failed to stimulate follicular growth, and concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), E2 and LH were not detectable. Six weeks later, gilts were given a booster immunization and then were given 112 micrograms LH and 15 micrograms FSH intravenously every 6 h for 9 d. The remaining ovary was removed on d 10. Although LH and FSH concentrations were elevated, administration of gonadotropins did not stimulate follicular growth or increase E2 concentrations. These results indicate that neither PMSG or exogenous LH and FSH can induce E2 synthesis or sustain follicular development in gilts actively immunized against GnRH.     

Influence of dose, frequency, and duration of infused gonadotropin-releasing hormone on secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in nutritionally anestrous beef cows.

Nutritionally induced anovulatory cows were ovariectomized and used to determine the relationships between dose, frequency, and duration of exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses and amplitude, frequency, and concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in serum. In Experiment 1, cows were given pulses of saline (control) or 2 micrograms of GnRH infused i.v. during a 0.1-, 1.25-, 5-, 10-, or 20-min period. Concentrations of LH and FSH during 35 min after GnRH infusion were greater than in control cows (P < 0.01), and FSH concentrations were greater when GnRH infusions were for 10 min or less compared with 20 min. In Experiment 2, the effect of GnRH pulse frequency and dose on LH and FSH concentrations, pulse frequency, and pulse amplitude were determined. Exogenous GnRH (0, 2, or 4 micrograms) was infused in 5 min at frequencies of once every hour or once every 4th hr for 3 d. There was a dose of GnRH x frequency x day effect on LH and FSH concentrations (P < 0.01), indicating that gonadotropes are sensitive to changes in pulse frequency, dose, and time of exposure to GnRH. There were more LH pulses when GnRH was infused every hour, compared with an infusion every 4th hr (P < 0.04). Amplitudes of LH pulses were greater with increased GnRH dose (P < 0.05), and there was a frequency x dose x day effect on FSH pulse amplitude (P < 0.0006). We conclude that LH and FSH secretion in the bovine is differentially regulated by frequency and dose of GnRH infusions.     

Pulsatile administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to gilts actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone

Sexually mature gilts (n = 20) were actively immunized against GnRH. Primary and booster immunizations of GnRH conjugated to bovine serum albumin induced production of antibodies in all gilts. Nineteen of the gilts became acyclic with suppressed concentrations of gonadotropins and estradiol. Intravenous challenges with 100 micrograms GnRH and 5 micrograms D-(Ala6, des-Gly-NH2(10)) ethylamide GnRH (a GnRH agonist that did not cross-react with antibodies produced by the gilts) caused release of LH and FSH, indicating maintenance of secretory capacity of pituitary gonadotropes in the immunized animals. Gilts were given 100 ng GnRH agonist at 2-h intervals for 72 h (n = 4) or 144 h (n = 10) or did not receive agonist (n = 5). Blood samples were taken every 6 h, and detectable concentrations of LH were observed in 42% and 52% of samples taken from gilts treated with or without agonist. In contrast, serum concentrations of FSH and estradiol were undetectable. Reproductive tracts and anterior pituitaries were taken from gilts at the conclusion of pulsatile administration of GnRH agonist or at 144 h for controls. Pituitary concentration of LH and FSH, uterine wet and dry weight, and size of the uterus were similar among groups. Paired ovarian weights for treated gilts pulsed with GnRH agonist for 72 h were heavier (P less than .05); however, ovaries from all immunized gilts were atrophied without follicular structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Resynchronization of estrus in beef cattle: ovarian function, estrus and fertility following progestin treatment and treatments to synchronize ovarian follicular development and estrus

The objective was to optimize rebreeding of nonpregnant, previously inseminated beef cattle. In Experiment 1, 43 cows received a used intravaginal progesterone-releasing insert (IVPRI; Days 0-7) 12.3 d after ovulation and received concurrently no treatment, 100 microg gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), 1 mg estradiol cypionate (ECP), or 150 mg progesterone. Emergence of a new ovarian follicular wave was most synchronous (P < 0.0001) in the GnRH group. In Experiment 2, 675 heifers were given GnRH or no treatment on Day 0, fed melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5 mg/head/d) from Days 0-5 (Day 0 = 13-14 d after timed insemination; TAI), given 0.5 mg ECP or nothing on Day 7, and reinseminated 6-12 h after onset of estrus. Estrus was more synchronous (P < 0.05) in heifers given GnRH versus no treatment on Day 0. In Experiment 3, 317 TAI heifers were resynchronized with either MGA or a used IVPRI with or without ECP on Day 7; estrus was more synchronous (P < 0.05) and pregnancy rates were higher (54.1% versus 39.2%, P < 0.05) in heifers given a used IVPRI than those fed MGA. For resynchronization of heifers, pregnancy rates were not significantly improved with GnRH treatment, but were higher with a used IVPRI than with MGA.     

Follicle growth in hypophysial stalk-transected pigs given pulsatile GnRH and pregnant mare serum gonadotropin

In experiment 1, nine prepuberal crossbred gilts 145 +/- 2 days of age and 90.3 +/- 1.6 kg body weight (BW) were hypophysial stalk-transected (HST) or sham-HST. Starting at 0800 on Day 1 (35 +/- 2 days after surgery), three sham-HST and two HST gilts received 3.5% sodium citrate vehicle (V) while two HST gilts and two sham-HST gilts received pulses of 2.5 micrograms GnRH every 45 min for 9 days via a jugular vein cannula. At 0800 on day 7, all gilts received 1,000 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) im. Blood was sampled every 15 min from 0800 to 0845 on Days 1 through 6. On Day 10, ovarian morphology and ovarian and follicular fluid weights were recorded. In experiment 2, eight prepuberal crossbred gilts, 146 +/- 6 days of age and 79.5 +/- 1.5 kg BW, were HST or sham-HST. Starting at 0800 on Day 1 (7 +/- 4 days after surgery), two sham-HST and three HST gilts received V, while three HST gilts received pulses of 2.5 micrograms GnRH every 45 min for 8 days. At 1200 on Day 5, all gilts, including three unoperated controls (UC), received 1,000 IU of PMSG im. Blood was sampled from all but UC gilts every 15 min from 0800 to 0845 on Days 1 through 5. Ovarian data were obtained on Day 9. The HST + V gilts failed to respond to PMSG, whereas growth of ovulatory follicles was stimulated in the other groups in both experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pituitary responsiveness to GnRH, hypothalamic content of GnRH and pituitary LH and FSH concentrations immediately preceding puberty in gilts

To determine whether pituitary concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) or hypothalamic content of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) change before puberty, 40 prepubertal gilts averaging 7 mo of age were slaughtered before or on the second, third or fourth day after relocation and boar exposure. Some gilts responded to relocation and boar exposure as indicated by swollen vulvae, turgid uteri and enlarged ovarian follicles at the time of slaughter. Pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH and hypothalamic content of GnRH were similar between gilts that responded to relocation and boar exposure and gilts that did not respond. In addition, boar exposure and relocation had no effect on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH or on hypothalamic content of GnRH. To determine whether pituitary responsiveness to GnRH changes before puberty, a third experiment was conducted in which 72 gilts were injected with 400 micrograms of GnRH either before or on the second, third or fourth day after relocation and boar exposure. In gilts that subsequently responded (i.e., ovulated) as a result of relocation and boar exposure, pituitary responsiveness to GnRH was reduced as compared with gilts that failed to ovulate after relocation and boar exposure. Peak concentrations of serum LH after GnRH injection were 4.6 +/- 1.3 vs 9.8 +/- .8 ng/ml for responders vs nonresponders. Peak serum FSH after GnRH injection was also lower for responders than for nonresponders (29.5 +/- 4.2 vs 41.2 +/- 2.4 ng/ml). When compared with controls, relocation and boar exposure did not significantly affect GnRH-induced release of LH and FSH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prolactin and luteinizing hormone secretion in the pregnant pig.

Four pregnant, primiparous, crossbred gilts and six gilts from the same population that had been ovariectomized (OVX) for approximately 3 wk were placed in individual pens in an enclosed building. Blood samples were collected every 30 min for 12 h from all gilts via an indwelling jugular vein cannula when the pregnant gilts were at d 30, 50, 70, 90, and 110 of gestation. Serum was quantified for LH and prolactin (PRL) by RIA. The OVX gilts served as controls to ensure that any variations in serum LH and PRL concentrations observed in the pregnant animals were not due to environmental factors unrelated to pregnancy. Within the pregnant gilts, mean serum LH concentrations, mean basal serum LH concentration, and mean serum LH peak height were similar on all days; however, number of LH peaks on d 30, 50, and 70 were greater (P < .05) than on d 90 and 110, and number of LH peaks on d 50 was greater (P < .05) than that on d 70. Within the pregnant gilts, mean serum PRL concentration, mean basal serum PRL concentration, and mean PRL peak height were greater (P < .001) on d 110 than on all other days; however, number of PRL peaks were similar among days. Parameters of LH and PRL secretion in the OVX and pregnant gilts varied independently. Results of this study indicated that 1) LH secretion does not vary appreciably throughout pregnancy and 2) PRL secretion does not vary significantly during the first 90 d of pregnancy, after which it increases markedly on or before 110 d.     

Effects of cortisol on pregnancy rate and corpus luteum function in heifers: an in vivo study

To determine whether glucocorticoids affect the function of the bovine corpus luteum (CL) during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, we examined the effects of exogenous cortisol or reduced endogenous cortisol on the secretion of progesterone (P4) and on pregnancy rate. In preliminary experiments, doses of cortisol and metyrapone (an inhibitor of cortisol synthesis) were established (n=33). Cortisol in effective doses of 10 mg blocked tumor necrosis factor-induced prostaglandin F(2α) secretion as measured by its metabolite (PGFM) concentrations in the blood. Metyrapone in effective doses of 500 mg increased the P4 concentration. Thus, both reagents were then intravaginally applied in the chosen doses daily from Day 15 to 18 after estrus (Day 0) in noninseminated heifers (n=18) or after artificial insemination (n=36). Pregnancy was confirmed by transrectal ultrasonography between Days 28-30 after insemination. Plasma concentrations of P4 were lower in cortisol-treated heifers than in control heifers on Days 17 and 18 of the estrous cycle (P<0.05). However, the interestrus intervals were not different between control and cortisol-treated animals (P>0.05). Moreover, metyrapone increased P4 and prolonged the CL lifespan in comparison to control animals (P<0.05). Interestingly, in inseminated heifers, cortisol increased the pregnancy rate (75%) compared with control animals (58%), whereas metyrapone reduced the pregnancy rate to 16.7% (P<0.05). The overall results suggest that cortisol, depending on the physiological status of heifers (pregnant vs. nonpregnant), modulates CL function by influencing P4 secretion. Cortisol may have a positive influence on CL function during early pregnancy, leading to support of embryo implantation and resulting in higher rates of pregnancy in heifers.     

Endocrine changes associated with a dietary-induced increase in ovulation rate (flushing) in gilts

Effects of an increased level of dietary energy (flushing) on plasma concentrations of FSH, LH, insulin, progesterone and estradiol-17 beta and ovulation rate were studied in 16 gilts. Gilts received 5,400 kcal ME/d for one estrous cycle and the first 7 d of a second. On d 8 of the second estrous cycle, gilts received either 5,400 kcal ME/d (control [C], n = 8) or 11,000 kcal ME/d (flushed [F], n = 8) for the remainder of the estrous cycle. Blood was collected daily at 15-min intervals for 6 h from d 8 through estrus. Gilts were examined by laparotomy 6 d after estrus. Ovulation rate was greater (P less than .05) in F than C gilts (16.0 vs 9.4). Mean daily concentrations of FSH were greater (P less than .05) in F gilts at 5 d, 4 d and 3 d prior to estrus compared with C females. In both C and F gilts, FSH decreased (P less than .05) prior to estrus. Mean daily concentrations of LH and LH pulse amplitude were not different (P greater than .05) between treatments. Mean number of LH pulses/6 h at 4 d, 3 d and 2 d prior to estrus were greater (P less than .05) in F than in C gilts. In both treatments, LH pulse amplitude decreased (P less than .05) and pulse frequency increased (P less than .07) prior to estrus. Mean plasma concentrations of insulin tended to be higher (P less than .07) in F than in C females during the 7-d period before estrus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

In vivo investigation of luteal function in dogs: Effects of cabergoline,a dopamine agonist,and prolactin on progesterone secretion during mid-pregnancy and -diestrus

The role of prolactin on luteal function in dogs was investigated in vivo. The function of prolactin in mid-luteal phase was compared in pregnant and nonpregnant dogs. A dopamine agonist, cabergoline, known for its prolactin secretion inhibitory effects, was injected subcutaneously at a dose of 5 μg/kg body weight in five pregnant and five nonpregnant Beagle bitches. Mean plasma prolactin and progesterone were dramatically suppressed for 4 to 5 days after injection in both groups when compared with control pregnant and non-pregnant animals, whereas no effect on luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was observed. The decline in plasma progesterone occurred after that in prolactin, suggesting plasma progesterone was impaired by inhibition of prolactin secretion. These results confirm the luteotropic importance of prolactin in pregnant bitches, and also demonstrate its importance in luteal phase of the nonpregnant dog.Second, to demonstrate that the effects of cabergoline were mediated by prolactin inhibition and not by a direct action on the corpus luteum, concomitant administration on Day 30 of cabergoline and prolactin (375 μg IV twice daily on Days 30 and 31) or cabergoline and LH (750 μg IV twice daily on Days 30 and 31) was affected in two groups of five pregnant animals each. Results showed that only prolactin was able to reverse the negative effects of cabergoline on circulating progesterone. This confirms the indirect mode of action of the dopamine agonist, cabergoline on corpus luteum function.Third, further investigation on the precise luteotropic role of prolactin was made by IV injection of 375 μg pure canine prolactin twice daily in five pregnant bitches on Days 30 and 31, and in five pregnant bitches on Days 40 and 41. No direct stimulatory effect of prolactin on plasma progesterone secretion occurred. Nor was there a noticeable effect on plasma LH secretion. These results suggest that prolactin is unable to directly stimulate progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum of pregnancy.The results of this study suggest that prolactin is an essential luteotropin in the dog from mid-luteal phase in both pregnant and nonpregnant animals. However, it appears to act by sustaining corpus luteum lifespan and function rather than by direct stimulatory effects on progesterone secretion.     

The effect of pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol administration on luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in pituitary stalk-sectioned ovariectomized pony mares

Hourly pulses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or bi-daily injections of estradiol (E2) can increase luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion in ovariectomized, anestrous pony mares. However, the site (pituitary versus hypothalamus) of positive feedback of estradiol on gonadotropin secretion has not been described in mares. Thus, one of our objectives involved investigating the feedback of estradiol on the pituitary. The second objective consisted of determining if hourly pulses of GnRH could re-establish physiological LH and FSH concentrations after pituitary stalk-section (PSS), and the third objective was to describe the declining time trends of LH and FSH secretion after PSS. During summer months, ovariectomized pony mares were divided into three groups: Group 1 (control, n = 2), Group 2 (pulsatile GnRH (25 μg/hr), n = 3), and Group 3 (estradiol (5 mg/12 hr), n = 3). All mares were stalk-sectioned and treatment begun immediately after stalk-section. Blood samples were collected every 30 min for 8 h on the day before surgery (DO) and 5 d post surgery (D5) to facilitate the comparison of gonadotropin levels before and after pituitary stalk-section. Additionally, jugular blood samples were collected every 12 hr beginning the evening of surgery, allowing for evaluation of the gonadotropin secretory time trends over the 10 d of treatment. On Day 10, animals were euthanized to confirm pituitary stalk-section and to submit tissue for messenger RNA analysis (parallel study). Plasma samples were assayed for LH and FSH by RIA. Mean LH secretion decreased from Day 0 to Day 5 in Groups 1 and 3, whereas LH secretion tended (P < 0.08) to decrease in Group 2 mares. On Day 5, LH was higher (P < 0.01) in Group 2 (17.26 ± 3.68 ng/ml; LSMEANS ± SEM), than either Group 1 (2.65 ± 4.64 ng/ml) or group 3 (4.28 ± 3.68 ng/ml). Group 1 did not differ from Group 3 on Day 5 (P < 0.40). Similarly, mean FSH levels decreased in all groups after surgery, yet Group 2 mares had significantly (P < 0.001) higher FSH concentrations (17.66 ± 1.53 ng/ml) than Group 1 or Group 3 (8.34 ± 1.84 and 7.69 ± 1. 63 ng/ml, respectively). Regression analysis of bi-daily LH and FSH levels indicated that the time trends were not parallel. These findings indicate: 1) Pituitary stalk-section lowered LH and FSH to undetectable levels within 5 d after surgery, 2) pulsatile administration of GnRH (25 μg/hr) maintained LH and FSH secretion, although concentrations tended to be lower than on Day 0, and 3) E2 did not stimulate LH or FSH secretion.     

Interactions of photoperiod, testosterone, and naloxone on GnRH and LH pulse parameters in the male sheep

This study tested the hypothesis that the effects of the opiate antagonist naloxone on GnRH (and LH) secretion is affected by photoperiod length and testosterone (T) concentrations. The effect of infusing naloxone on GnRH and LH pulse patterns was determined in four groups of orchidectomized sheep: long day (LD) photoperiod treated with T, LD without T (LDC), short day photoperiod (SD) with T, SDC (n = 5-7/group). Hypophyseal-portal and jugular blood samples were collected at 10 min intervals for 4 h before and 4 h during naloxone infusion (1 mg/kg/h). Neither photoperiod nor T affected either mean GnRH or LH whereas naloxone (P < 0.01) increased both. LD photoperiod (P < 0.01), T (P < 0.01) and naloxone (P < 0.01) all increased LH pulse amplitude whereas only naloxone increased GnRH pulse amplitude (P < 0.01). There was an interaction (P < 0.01) between steroid and naloxone on LH, but not GnRH, pulse amplitude. Both LD photoperiod and T increased both LH and GnRH (P < 0.01) interpulse-interval (IPI). Naloxone decreased GnRH IPI (P < 0.01). The LH/GnRH pulse amplitude ratio was (P < 0.02) increased by T--likely a secondary response to the T-induced increase in IPI. These results are interpreted as showing that in the ram the endogenous opiate peptides regulate both GnRH pulse frequency and amplitude, but that their specific role is modulated by photoperiod and T. These results do not support the concept that the opiate peptides are the primary mediators of the negative feedback effects of T.     

Lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone-III selectively releases follicle stimulating hormone in the bovine

Recent studies have shown that lamprey gonadotropin-releasing hormone (l-GnRH) is localized in the mammalian brain, and that l-GnRH-III, can selectively induce FSH secretion in the rat both in vivo and in vitro. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to determine if l-GnRH-III could elicit selective FSH release in cattle and compare this response with that to mammalian luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (m-LHRH). Cattle were chosen as the animal model because previous studies have demonstrated that FSH and LH are secreted by separate gonadotropes in that species. For these studies, crossbred cycling heifers were implanted with jugular cannulae and l-GnRH-III was infused either between Days 9–14 or on Day 20 of the estrous cycle. Blood samples were collected both before and following peptide infusion. Our results demonstrate that during Days 9–14 of the estrous cycle (luteal phase), when progesterone levels averaged between 4 and 5 ng/ml, a dose of 0.25 mg of l-GnRH-III induced the release of FSH (P < 0.05), but not LH. A 0.5 mg dose of l-GnRH-III caused a greater release of FSH (P < 0.01), but still did not induce LH release. Higher doses of the peptide were capable of significantly releasing both gonadotropins. Importantly, during the luteal phase, doses of 0.5 and 2 mg of m-LHRH were ineffective in stimulating FSH, but did elicit marked increases (P < 0.001) in LH. Again, progesterone levels averaged 4–5 pg/ml. In order to assess gonadotropin releasing ability of l-GnRH-III at a different phase of the estrous cycle, some animals were administered the peptide on Day 20, when progesterone levels were below 1.0 pg/ml. At this time, the l-GnRH-III induced the release of LH (P < 0.01), but not FSH. Overall, our results demonstrate that l-GnRH-III can selectively induce FSH in cattle during the luteal phase, whereas m-LHRH was ineffective in that regard. Furthermore, the fact that l-GnRH-III can selectively stimulate FSH when serum progesterone is high, and LH when serum progesterone is low, suggests its actions are under strong control of this steroid. We suggest the FSH releasing capacity of l-GnRH-III in cattle could render this peptide useful for enhancement of reproductive efficiency in this species.     

Relationship between peripheral plasma inhibin and FSH concentrations in Sahiwal cows (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Bos indicus</Emphasis>) and Murrah buffaloes (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Bubalus bubalis</Emphasis>) during estrous cycle

The present investigation was undertaken to study the relationship between circulating inhibin and FSH concentrations during the estrous cycle in buffaloes and Sahiwal cattle. The pattern of inhibin concentrations was similar, with peak concentrations on Day -2 (Day 0 = day of estrus) and minimum concentrations on Days 12 and 11 in buffaloes and cattle, respectively. Circulating FSH concentrations were the highest on Day 0 and lowest on Days 8 and 13 in buffaloes and cattle, respectively. Peripheral plasma inhibin concentrations were negatively correlated to FSH concentrations in buffaloes (r = -0.27, P < 0.01) and cattle (r = -0.35, P < 0.01) indicating that inhibin is involved in negative feedback regulation of FSH in both these species.     

Corpus luteum activity,fertility, and adrenal cortex response in lactating carora cows during rainy and dry seasons in the tropics of Venezuela

The effects of the rainy (RS) and the dry season (DS) on fertility, corpus luteum activity, and adrenal cortex response relationships were evaluated after first service (49 ± 6 d postpartum) in Carora cows, a dairy cattle of Venezuela raised in tropical conditions. Cows (n = 84 in RS and n = 98 in DS) were kept semistabled, had two or three calvings, body condition score 3.5 on a 5-point scale, and similar milk yield (2450 ± 560 kg of milk during the previous lactation). Cows were grouped retrospectively according to pregnancy status. A split-plot model with repeated measures over Days 5, 7, 10, 14, and 15 after insemination was used to analyze the effects of season, pregnancy status, and their interaction involving the day on: 1) serum concentrations of progesterone in four treatments: RS pregnant (n = 26), RS nonpregnant (n = 24), DS pregnant (n = 24), and DS nonpregnant (n = 20) cows; 2) serum concentrations of cortisol at Days 0, 10, 14, 15, and 16 postservice in the previous treatments (n = 9, 7, 6, and 8, respectively); and 3) concentrations of cortisol after 0.1 mg of adrenocorticotropin in these last four groups of cows at Day 14 postin-semination. Breeding during the DS decreased (P < 0.05) conception rate to first service and increased (P < 0.01) days in service. In addition, the DS decreased (P < 0.05) the percentages of cows with normal interestrous interval (20–22 d), expression of estrus, and (P < 0.01) luteal phase progesterone; but DS increased (P < 0.05) percentages of short and long estrous cycles, anovulatory estrus, and repeat breeding rate. Mean serum concentration of progesterone was lower (P < 0.05) at Days 10, 14, and 15 in DS nonpregnant than in DS pregnant cows, and lower during luteal phase (P < 0.05) in DS nonpregnant than RS nonpregnant cows. Serum cortisol concentration was greater (P < 0.05) at Days 10, 14, and 16 in DS nonpregnant than DS pregnant cows. A significant (P < 0.05) negative correlation (r = −0.78) between serum concentrations of progesterone and cortisol was found within DS nonpregnant cows. Concentrations of cortisol after adrenocorticotropin were greater (P < 0.05) in DS nonpregnant cows than in other groups. These results indicate that elevated concentrations of cortisol associated with the DS may decrease progesterone secreted by the corpus luteum and therefore mediate the negative effect of the DS on fertility.     

Induction of ovulation in the prepuberal gilt by pulsatile administration of gonadotropin releasing hormone

An attempt was made to induce precocious puberty in gilts approximately 164 days of age by stimulating a luteinizing hormone (LH) secretory pattern similar to that which occurs before normal onset of puberty. Hourly iv administration of 1 μg synthetic gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) for 7 or 8 days resulted in a mean serum LH concentration of 1.7 ± .3 ng/ml in three treated gilts compared with .9 ± .1 ng/ml in three control gilts (P<.08). Serum LH peak frequency was also greater (P<.05) in treated (3.4 ± .5 peaks/4 hr) than in control gilts (1.2 ± .1 peaks/4 hr), but serum LH peak amplitude was not altered (P>.33) by GnRH treatment. All treated gilts displayed estrus and ovulated within 6 days after treatment began, and all control gilts remained prepuberal throughout the study (P=.05). Only one of the three treated gilts displayed a normal estrous cycle and reovulated after treatment. Precocious ovulation but not puberty was induced in gilts by hourly administration of 1 μg synthetic GnRH, indicating that the pituitary and ovaries of 164-day-old gilts are competent and that final sexual maturation occurs at the hypothalamic level.     

Hourly administration of GnRH to prepubertal gilts: endocrine and ovulatory responses from 70 to 190 days of age.

This study investigated the responsiveness of the pituitary-ovarian axis of prepubertal gilts to hourly injections (i.v.) with GnRH. Six gilts each at 70, 100, 150, and 190 d of age were assigned either to treatment with GnRH or saline. Treatments were given until gilts showed estrus or for 7 d, whichever came first. Hourly pulsing with GnRH resulted in gradually increasing concentrations of estradiol-17 beta (E2), a preovulatory surge of LH, and subsequently increased progesterone (P4) concentrations. The increase in serum P4 was preceded by ovulation and corpora lutea (CL) formation in two gilts 70 d of age and all older gilts. The interval (h) from start of GnRH treatment to peak E2 (88 +/- 3), peak LH (103 +/- 3), and concentrations of P4 greater than or equal to 1 ng/mL (144 +/- 4) did not differ (P greater than .50) for 18 gilts between 100 and 190 d of age. In two ovulating, 70-d-old gilts, the interval from onset of GnRH treatment to peak E2 (171 +/- 6), peak LH (186 +/- 0), and P4 greater than or equal to 1 ng/mL (216 +/- 4) was lengthened (P less than .001). Peak concentrations of E2 (pg/mL) were higher (P less than .01) at 190 d (48 +/- 2) and 150 d (49 +/- 2) than at younger ages and lower (P less than .01) in gilts 70 d of age (31 +/- 1) than in gilts 100 d of age (41 +/- 2). Peak LH (nanograms/milliliter) was higher (P less than .01) in gilts 100 d of age (12.7 +/- 6) than in older gilts. Concentrations of P4 were similar (P greater than .20) for all ovulating gilts. The number of CL (12.7 +/- .7) did not differ (P greater than .20) for 18 gilts 100 d of age or older but was higher (P less than .01) than that (4.5 +/- 1.1) for two gilts 70 d of age. Corresponding endocrine responses or ovulations were not observed in four 70-d-old gilts treated with GnRH or in gilts given saline. These findings indicate that the functional integration of the pituitary-ovarian axis is completed between 70 and 100 d of age. Hourly treatment with GnRH is an adequate stimulus to induce ovulation in prepubertal gilts as early as 70 d of age. Also, the number of follicles reaching ovulatory competency was similar (P greater than .20) in gilts between 100 and 190 d of age, when GnRH was given on a BW basis.     

Comparison of luteinizing hormone and steroid hormone secretion during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods in Mangalica and Landrace gilts

The objective of this study was to determine plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P4) and estradiol-17beta (E2) in Mangalica gilts (M), a Hungarian native breed, and compare them with Landrace gilts (L) during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods. The estrous cycle of gilts was synchronised by Regumate feeding, and ovulation was induced with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Blood sampling was carried out via indwelling jugular catheters three times a day and in 2-h intervals during a 16-h period after the GnRH application. The concentrations of LH, E2 and P4 were determined by immunoassays. Gilts of both breeds showed a typical gonadotropin and gonadal hormone secretion pattern. Preovulatory E2 peaks were observed on day 2 (M) and day 4 (L) after the last Regumate feeding. Highest E2 concentration was different between M and L breeds (46.5 +/- 5.7 vs. 26.0 +/- 6.8 pg/ml, P < 0.05). Maximum LH levels measured up to 6 h after GnRH were not different between M and L breeds (11.5 +/- 4.1 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.3 ng/ml). Both LH amounts during surge (41.1 +/- 15.9 vs. 27.5 +/- 6.1 ng/ml) and total over LH release (73.4 +/- 22.2 vs. 50.0 +/- 8.7 ng/ml) did not differ significantly between M and L breeds. P4 concentrations started to rise on day 6 after Regumate feeding and increased significantly from 0.6 +/- 0.3 and 0.7 +/- 0.4 ng/ml to maximal 14.0 +/- 2.4 and 11.3 +/- 2.1 ng/ml in M and L breeds, respectively. Mean P4 secretion was higher in M on days 10-15 (12.9 +/- 2.6 vs. 9.3 +/- 2.2 ng/ml; P<0.05). At the same time the number of corpora lutea was lower in M compared to L (10.3 +/-1.5 vs. 17.8 +/- 5.0, P<0.05). In our experiment, there was no evidence that differences in the secretion of analysed hormones during the peri- and post-ovulatory periods are a possible cause of usually lower fecundity in Mangalica gilts.