Composition of HMW and LMW Glutenin Subunits and Their Effects on Dough Properties,Pan Bread,and Noodle Quality of Chinese Bread Wheats

Knowledge of composition of high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS) and low molecular weight glutenin subunits (LMW‐GS) and their associations with pan bread and noodle quality will contribute to genetically improving processing quality of Chinese bread wheats. Two trials including a total of 158 winter and facultative cultivars and advanced lines were conducted to detect the allelic variation at Glu‐1 and Glu‐3 loci by SDS‐PAGE electrophoresis and to understand their effects on dough properties, pan bread, and dry white Chinese noodle (DWCN) quality. Results indicate that subunits/alleles 1 and null at Glu‐A1, 7+8 and 7+9 at Glu‐B1, 2+12 and 5+10 at Glu‐D1, alleles a and d at Glu‐A3, and alleles j and d at Glu‐B3 predominate in Chinese germplasm, and that 34.9% of the tested genotypes carry the 1B/1R translocation (allelic variation at Glu‐D3 was not determined because no significant effects were reported previously). Both variations at HMW‐GS and LMW‐GS/alleles and loci interactions contribute to dough properties and processing quality. For dough strength related traits such as farinograph stability and extensigraph maximum resistance and loaf volume, subunits/alleles 1, 7+8, 5+10, and Glu‐A3d are significantly better than those of their counterpart allelic variation, however, no significant difference was observed for the effects of d, b, and f at Glu‐B3 on these traits. For extensigraph extensibility, only subunits 1 and 7+8 are significantly better than their counterpart alleles, and alleles d and b at Glu‐B3 are slightly better than others. For DWCN quality, no significant difference is observed for HMW‐GS at Glu‐1, and Glu‐A3d and Glu‐B3d are slightly better than other alleles. Glu‐B3j, associated the 1B/1R translocation, has a strong negative effect on all quality traits except protein content. It is recommended that selection for subunits/alleles 1, 7+8, 5+10, and Glu‐A3d could contribute to improving gluten quality and pan bread quality. Reducing the frequency of the 1B/1R translocation will be crucial to wheat quality improvement in China.     

Influence of High Molecular Weight (HMW) and Low Molecular Weight (LMW) Glutenin Subunits Controlled by Glu‐1 and Glu‐3 Loci on Durum Wheat Quality

The progenies of four intervarietal durum wheat crosses were used to determine the effects of glutenin variants coded at Glu‐1 and Glu‐3 loci on durum wheat quality properties. The F₂ lines were analyzed for high molecular weight (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) glutenin composition by electrophoresis. Whole grain derived F₃ and F₄ samples were analyzed for vitreousness, protein, and dry gluten contents, gluten index, SDS sedimentation volume, mixograph, and alveograph properties. Allelic variation at the Glu‐B1 and Glu‐B3 loci affected gluten quality significantly. Comparisons among the Glu‐B3 and Glu‐B1 loci indicated that the LMW glutenin subunits controlled by Glu‐B3 c and j made the largest positive contribution, followed by the alleles a, k, and b. HMW glutenin subunits 14+15 gave larger SDS values and higher mixing development times than subunits 7+8 and 20. The positive effects of the glutenin subunits LMW c and HMW 14+15 were additive. Flour protein content, vitreousness, and mixograph peak height values were positively correlated with each other as well as with Dglut values, whereas the SDS sedimentation highly correlated with mixing development time, alveograph strength, and extensibility but was not correlated with the other parameters. The results of quality analysis, together with the results of the genetic analysis, led to the conclusion that SDS sedimentation, mixograph mixing development time, and peak breakdown are the tests more influenced by allelic variation of prolamin. The uses of the results in durum wheat quality breeding programs are discussed.     

Effects of Allelic Variations in Wx‐1, Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 Loci on Flour Characteristics and White Salted Noodle‐Making Quality of Wheat Flour

Doubled haploid wheat lines developed from a cross between a hard white winter wheat variety of normal starch endosperm and a waxy wheat variety were used to determine the effects of allelic variation in Wx‐1, Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 loci on physiochemical properties of flour, noodle dough properties, and textural quality of cooked noodles. Milling yield, damaged starch content, protein content, and SDS sedimentation volume of flour were influenced the most by allelic composition of Pinb‐D1 loci, less by Wx‐1 loci, and least by Glu‐B3. Wheat lines carrying Pinb‐D1b or Glu‐B3h alleles exhibited higher milling yield and damaged starch content of flour than those with Pinb‐D1a and Glu‐B3d alleles. Wheat lines carrying the Pinb‐D1b allele were higher in protein content and SDS sedimentation volume than those carrying Pinb‐D1a. Mixograph water absorption was largely influenced by allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci, whereas mixograph mixing time and mixing tolerance were predominantly determined by allelic composition of Glu‐D1 loci. Amylose content and pasting properties of starch were mainly determined by allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci with little influence by allelic compositions of Glu‐D1, Glu‐B3, and Pinb‐D1 loci. Allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci contributed 53.4% of the variation in optimum water absorption of noodle dough and 26.7% of the variation in thickness of the noodle dough sheet. The variation of 7.8% in optimum water absorption of noodle dough was contributed by the allelic composition of Pinb‐D1 loci. Allelic composition of Wx‐1 loci was responsible for 73.2, 74.4, and 59.6% in the variation of hardness, springiness, and cohesiveness of cooked noodles, respectively. Cohesiveness of cooked noodles was also influenced by the allelic compositions of Glu‐B3 and Pinb‐D1 loci to a smaller extent.     

Influence of Low Molecular Weight Glutenins on Viscoelastic Properties of Intact Wheat Kernels and Their Relation to Functional Properties of Wheat Dough

The mechanical and viscoelastic properties of intact wheat kernels of 36 wheat cultivars differing in low molecular weight glutenin subunit (LMW‐GS) composition (loci Glu‐A3, Glu‐B3, and Glu‐D3) were evaluated using load‐compression tests. Comparison among genotypic groups representing Glu‐3 allelic variants showed that groups representing the alleles Glu‐A3 b, c, and d; Glu‐B3 d, g, and h; and Glu‐D3 a, b, and d, had harder kernel texture, higher kernel elastic work and larger gluten strength‐related parameters than those possessing alleles Glu‐A3 e; Glu‐B3 f, i and j (translocation 1B/1R); and Glu‐D3 d. Modulus of elasticity (stress to strain ratio) showed low values (111.9–168.8 MPa) for allelic groups possessing poor elastic properties (Glu‐A3 e; Glu‐B3 f, i, and j; and Glu‐D3 d), and high values (179.8–222.6 MPa) for allelic groups possessing high kernel elastic properties (Glu‐A3 b c, and d; Glu‐B3 d, g, and h; and Glu‐D3 a, b and c). The highest values for gluten strength‐related parameters (SDS‐sedimentation, dough mixing time, and dough strength [W]) corresponded to allelic groups Glu‐A3 d; Glu‐B3 d and g; and Glu‐D3 d, while the lowest corresponded to Glu‐A3 e and Glu‐B3 j. No significant differences were observed among groups with regard to gluten extensibility parameters; however, the highest P/L value (least extensibility) corresponded to Glu‐B3 j, which indicates presence of 1B/1R translocation. Except for the Glu‐B3 j (translocation 1B/1R) allele, which presented more variation within samples, a general relationship between kernel viscoelastic properties and dough viscoelastic properties was observed; samples showing higher elastic work to plastic work ratio (E/P) tended to possess better gluten strength than cultivars with low E/P ratio.     

Influence of Low‐Molecular‐Weight Glutenin Subunit Haplotypes on Dough Rheology in Elite Common Wheat Varieties

The low‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits (LMW‐GSs) are a class of wheat seed storage proteins encoded by a multigene family located at the Glu‐3 loci that influences wheat end‐use quality. Owing to ambiguities in the LMW‐GS allele nomenclature and to the complexity of the Glu‐3 loci organization, a clear relationship between LMW‐GS alleles and wheat end‐use quality has not been adequately determined. In the present study, four sets of elite common wheat varieties were analyzed for their LMW‐GS genic profile, along with their dough rheology and end‐product baking properties. Among these varieties, variation at the Glu‐A3 locus had a major impact on the analyzed dough rheology parameters, followed by the Glu‐B3 and Glu‐D3 loci. Also, the genes located at the linkage groups Glu‐A3‐3, Glu‐B3‐3, and Glu‐D3‐5 were more highly associated with dough strength, mixing, and extensibility properties. Results obtained in this study clearly indicate that there are specific LMW‐GS haplotypes that are more highly associated than others to variation in dough rheology.     

Impact of Null Polyphenol Oxidase Alleles on White Salted Noodles

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) causes Asian noodles to lose their bright color over time. Null Ppo‐A1 and Ppo‐D1 alleles are available that confer very low kernel PPO levels. Our goal was to characterize the effect of the Ppo‐A1i and Ppo‐D1f null alleles on the color and texture profile of white salted noodles. A white‐seeded spring wheat carrying Ppo‐A1i/Ppo‐A2d and Ppo‐D1f was crossed to a hard white‐seeded isoline of Choteau spring wheat with Ppo‐A1b/Ppo‐A2a and Ppo‐D1b and to a hard white‐seeded isoline of Vida spring wheat with Ppo‐A1a/Ppo‐A2b and Ppo‐D1b. Resultant lines homozygous for the null‐Ppo alleles or for the alternate parent Ppo alleles were selected and grown in replicated trials. The null‐Ppo alleles had no detrimental effects on kernel or flour traits. Noodles prepared from straight‐grade or whole wheat flour from the null‐Ppo allele class were less cohesive and softer than noodles from the alternate parent Ppo allele class for the White Choteau but not the White Vida population. Noodles prepared from straight‐grade and whole wheat flour from the null‐Ppo class were brighter, more red, and more yellow after 24 h and showed less change in L* with time than noodles prepared from the alternate parent Ppo class. The relative difference between the two genotype classes for change in L* with time (0–24 h) exceeded 3.5 L* for noodles from both types of flour, which was an improvement over existing low‐Ppo alleles. Incorporating the null‐Ppo alleles into wheat varieties could improve the color profile of Asian noodles.     

Effect of High‐Molecular‐Weight Glutenin Subunit Allelic Composition on Wheat Flour Tortilla Quality

Wheat cultivars possessing quality attributes needed to produce optimum quality tortillas have not been identified. This study investigated the effect of variations in high‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits encoded at the Glu‐1 loci (Glu‐A1, Glu‐B1, and Glu‐D1) on dough properties and tortilla quality. Flour protein profiles, dough texture, and tortilla physical quality attributes were evaluated. Deletion at Glu‐D1 resulted in reduced insoluble polymeric protein content of flour, reduced dough compression force, and large dough extensibility. These properties produced very large tortillas (181 mm diameter) compared with a control made with commercial tortilla wheat flour (161 mm). Presence of a 7 + 9 allelic pair at Glu‐B1 increased dough strength (largest compression force, reduced extensibility, and small‐diameter tortillas). Deletion at Glu‐A1 produced large tortillas (173 mm) but with unacceptable flexibility during storage (score <3.0 at day 16). In general, presence of 2* at Glu‐A1, in combination with 5 + 10 at Glu‐D1, produced small‐diameter tortillas that required large force to rupture (tough texture). Presence of 2 + 12 alleles instead of 5 + 10 at Glu‐D1 produced tortillas with a good compromise between diameter (>165 mm) and flexibility during storage (>3.0 at day 16). These allele combinations, along with deletion at Glu‐D1, show promise for tortilla wheat development.     

Two‐Site Sandwich ELISA for Discriminating Different Gli‐1 (gliadin)/Glu‐3 (LMW‐glutenin subunit) Alleles in Hexaploid Wheat

A panel of monoclonal antibodies was assessed in a two‐site sandwich ELISA format, using both reduced glutenin subunit and gliadin‐rich antigen preparations, to develop assays that could potentially discriminate between Gli‐1/Glu‐3 allelic variants in hexaploid wheat. Each antibody was assessed as the immobilized and the enzyme‐labeled antibody in the sandwich ELISA. A number of antibody combination were identified which could discriminate different Gli‐1/Glu‐3 allelic variants in a population of doubled haploid lines derived from a cross between parents that differed at each of these loci. Certain labeled antibodies consistently detected allelic variation at a particular locus when used in conjunction with any of several immobilized antibodies. However, the level of discrimination was largely dependent on the choice of immobilized antibody. Two antibody combinations were identified that provided twofold differences in ELISA absorbances in flour extracts from different allelic variants at the Gli‐A1/Glu‐A3 and Gli‐B1/Glu‐B3 loci. By analyzing the prolamin composition of the antigen preparations, and the performance of the assays with flour extracts from a set of Gli‐1/Glu‐3 biotypes and a range of diverse cultivars, the biochemical basis for the discrimination was determined. The assays may have potential for use in high‐throughput screening in wheat breeding programs.     

Influence of High Molecular Weight Glutenins on Viscoelastic Properties of Intact Wheat Kernel and Relation to Functional Properties of Wheat Dough

High and low molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS and LMW‐GS, respectively) are the main factors determining the viscoelastic properties of wheat dough. The mechanical and viscoelastic properties of 29 samples of wheat kernels differing in HMW‐GS were evaluated with load‐compression tests. Samples were grouped by genotypes differing in HMW‐GS composition (allelic variants: Glu‐A1: null, 1, 2*; Glu‐B1: 7, 7+8, 7+9, 13+16, and 17+18; Glu‐D1: 5+10, 2+12). Groups representing Glu‐A1 1 and 2*; Glu‐B1 7, 7+9 and 17+18; and Glu‐D1 5+10 generally possessed hard grain and showed the largest kernel elasticity values, while those representing subunits Glu‐A1 null; Glu‐B1 7+8; and Glu‐D1 2+12 had soft kernels and showed lower elastic work values. Genotypes possessing HMW‐GS 1, 17+18 and 5+10 gave large SDS‐sedimentation values and better dough viscoelastic properties than those with allelels: null, 7+8, and 2+12. Kernel hardness showed significant correlation with the dough‐strength‐related parameters: SDS‐sedimentation; dough mixing time; and the alveographic parameters, W and P. There was a negative correlation between kernel plastic work and dough mixing time and the dough tenacity/extensibility parameters, P/L. The significant relationship between sedimentation tests and kernel elastic work seems to indicate that elastic work is related to genotype (protein composition). The general tendency was that higher values in kernel elastic work and size corresponded to better dough rheological quality. Mechanical properties of the kernel were significantly related to the elastic behavior measured in a single wheat kernel. The use of the compression test on individual kernels is easy, rapid and nondestructive and therefore seems to show potential use as a rapid tool in breeding to improve wheat quality.     

Comparison of Quality Characteristics and Breadmaking Functionality of Hard Red Winter and Hard Red Spring Wheat

Various whole‐kernel, milling, flour, dough, and breadmaking quality parameters were compared between hard red winter (HRW) and hard red spring (HRS) wheat. From the 50 quality parameters evaluated, values of only nine quality characteristics were found to be similar for both classes. These were test weight, grain moisture content, kernel size, polyphenol oxidase content, average gluten index, insoluble polymeric protein (%), free nonpolar lipids, loaf volume potential, and mixograph tolerance. Some of the quality characteristics that had significantly higher levels in HRS than in HRW wheat samples included grain protein content, grain hardness, most milling and flour quality measurements, most dough physicochemical properties, and most baking characteristics. When HRW and HRS wheat samples were grouped to be within the same wheat protein content range (11.4–15.8%), the average value of many grain and breadmaking quality characteristics were similar for both wheat classes but significant differences still existed. Values that were higher for HRW wheat flour were color b*, free polar lipids content, falling number, and farinograph tolerance. Values that were higher for HRS wheat flour were geometric mean diameter, quantity of insoluble polymeric proteins and gliadins, mixograph mix time, alveograph configuration ratio, dough weight, crumb grain score, and SDS sedimentation volume. This research showed that the grain and flour quality of HRS wheat generally exceeds that of HRW wheat whether or not samples are grouped to include a similar protein content range.     

Synergistic and Additive Effects of Three High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunit Loci. II. Effects on Wheat Dough Functionality and End‐Use Quality

Understanding the relationship between basic and applied rheological parameters and the contribution of wheat flour protein content and composition in defining these parameters requires information on the roles of individual flour protein components. The high molecular weight glutenin subunit (HMW‐GS) proteins are major contributors to dough strength and stability. This study focused on eight homozygous wheat lines derived from the bread wheat cvs. Olympic and Gabo with systematic deletions at each of three HMW‐GS encoding gene loci, Glu‐A1, Glu‐B1, and Glu‐D1. Flour protein levels were adjusted to a constant 9% by adding starch. Functionality of the flours was characterized by small‐scale methods (2‐g mixograph, microextension tester). End‐use quality was evaluated by 2‐g microbaking and 10‐g noodle‐making procedures. In this sample set, the Glu‐D1 HMW‐GS (5+10) made a significantly larger contribution to dough properties than HMW‐GS coded by Glu‐B1 (17+18), while subunit 1 coded by Glu‐A1 made the smallest contribution to functionality. These differences remained after removing variations in glutenin‐to‐gliadin ratio. Correlations showed that both basic rheological characteristics and protein size distributions of these flours were good predictors of several applied rheological and end‐use quality tests.     

Interactions of Genotype and Glutenin Subunit Composition on Breadmaking Quality of Durum 1AS•1AL‐1DL Translocation Lines

Dual‐purpose durum (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum) wheat, having both good pasta and breadmaking quality, would be an advantage in the market. In this study, we evaluated the effects of genotype and varying HMW and LMW glutenin subunit composition on durum breadmaking quality. Genotypes included five near‐isogenic backgrounds that also differed by variability at the Glu‐D1d (HMW subunits 1Dx5+1Dy10), Glu‐B1 (presence or absence of subunit 1By8), and Glu‐B3 (LMWI or LMWII pattern) loci. Quality tests were conducted on genotypes grown at five North Dakota locations. Genotype had a stronger influence on free asparagine content than glutenin subunit composition. Genotypes carrying Glu‐D1d had higher glutenin content than lines that did not carry Glu‐D1d. Among Rugby translocation genotypes, lines carrying LMWI had higher gliadin content and better loaf volume than genotypes carrying LMWII. Absence of 1By8 produced major reductions in loaf volume in nontranslocation lines regardless of whether LMWI or LMWII was present. In contrast, the presence of Glu‐D1d compensated well for the absence of 1By8 regardless of which LMW pattern was present. The durum genotypes did not have loaf volumes equal to bread wheat cultivars, and results suggest that improved extensibility is needed to improve durum breadmaking quality.     

Reduced Amylose Effects on Bread and White Salted Noodle Quality

Amylose content in wheat endosperm is controlled by three Wx loci, and the proportion of amylose decreases with successive accumulation of Wx null alleles at the three loci. The proportion of amylose is believed to influence end‐use quality of bread and Asian noodles. The objectives of this study were to determine influence of the allelic difference at Wx‐B1 locus on bread quality, bread firmness, and white salted noodle texture in a spring wheat cross segregating for the Wx‐B1 locus and in a set of advanced spring wheat breeding lines differing in allelic state at the Wx‐ B1 locus. In addition, we examined the relationship between amylose content and flour swelling properties on bread and noodle traits. Fifty‐four recombinant inbred lines of hard white spring wheat plus parents were grown in replicated trials in two years, and 31 cultivars and breeding lines of hard spring wheat were grown in two locations. Bread and white salted noodles were processed from these trials. The presence of the Wx‐B1 null allele reduced amylose content by 2.4% in a recombinant inbred population and 4.3% in a survey of advanced breeding lines and cultivars compared with the normal. The reduced amylose was accompanied by an average increase in flour swelling power (FSP) for the Wx‐B1 null group of 0.8 g/g for the cross progeny and 2.3 g/g for the cultivar survey group. The Wx‐B1 allelic difference did not affect flour protein in cross progeny where the allelic difference was not confounded with genetic background. Bread from the Wx‐B1 null groups on average had increased loaf volume and was softer than the normal group for the cross progeny and cultivar survey group. The Wx‐B1 allelic difference altered white salted noodle texture, most notably noodle springiness and cohesiveness where the Wx‐B1 null groups was more springy and more cohesive than the normal groups for both sets of genetic materials. Flour protein was more highly related to loaf volume than were FSP or amylose. Both flour protein and FSP were positively related to noodle textural traits, but especially noodle springiness and cohesiveness.     

Specific Glu‐D1ƒ Allele Frequency of Japanese Common Wheat Compared with Distribution of Glu‐1 Alleles in Chinese Wheat

The quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain favored in breadmaking is strongly affected by components of seed storage protein, particularly high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS). The HMW‐GS 2.2 controlled by the Glu‐D1ƒ allele is frequently found in Japanese cultivars and landraces. In the investigation into the factors affecting the distribution of the allele, the available data on HMW‐GS of common wheats from Japan were analyzed and compared with the data for intensity of winter habit and wheat flour hardness. We show that the main factors affecting the Glu‐D1ƒ allele frequency in Japanese wheat were the intensity of natural selection for winter habit and artificial selection for flour hardness. According to a study of the worldwide distribution of Glu‐1 alleles, the Glu‐D1ƒ allele is rare. However, Glu‐D1ƒ allele was the most common Japanese wheat seed storage protein allele. It is well known that Chinese wheat contributed to Japanese landraces, and Japanese landraces contributed to modern cultivars from Japan. However, common Japanese and Chinese wheats differ in the frequencies of Glu‐D1ƒ allele. These results may be explained either by the founder effect or by a selective bottleneck in Japanese common wheat genetic resources.     

A Study of Puroindoline b Gene Involvement in the Milling Behavior of Hard‐Type Common Wheats

Differences in milling behavior among hard‐type common wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars are well known to millers. Among them, the French cultivar Soissons, which contains the Pinb‐D1d allelic form of the puroindoline b gene, is particularly distinguished for its high milling value. Near‐isogenic lines (NILs) differing by the allelic forms of the puroindoline b gene, Pinb‐D1d or Pinb‐D1b (one of the most frequent alleles found in the European wheat population), were constructed. Grain characteristics obtained after wheat cultivation in distinct environmental conditions were compared between NILs and the cultivar Soissons, as was their fractionation behavior. Results showed that NILs containing the Pinb‐D1d allele displayed lower values of grain hardness and vitreousness than did the corresponding lines containing the Pinb‐D1b allelic form under the same cultivation conditions. Both genetic background and environmental conditions appeared to affect grain texture. Measured single‐kernel characterization system hardness index values of the samples under study were found to be correlated with the vitreousness values. Studies of the milling behavior helped to point out that grain vitreousness is an important factor acting on endosperm breakage ability, whatever the genetic background of the wheat. Our results also demonstrated that, at similar levels of vitreousness, the endosperm of Soissons could more easily be reduced than that of other wheat lines.     

Synergistic and Additive Effects of Three High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunit Loci. I. Effects on Wheat Dough Rheology

The high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW‐GS) play an important role in governing the functional properties of wheat dough. To understand the role of HMW‐GS in defining the basic and applied rheological parameters and end‐use quality of wheat dough, it is essential to conduct a systematic study where the effect of different HMW‐GS are determined. This study focuses on the effect of HMW‐GS on basic rheological properties. Eight wheat lines derived from cvs. Olympic and Gabo were used in this study. One line contained HMW‐GS coded by all three loci, three lines were each null at one of the loci, three lines were null at two of the loci and one line null at all three loci. The flour protein level of all samples was adjusted to a constant 9% by adding starch. In another set of experiments, in addition to the flour protein content being held at 9%, the glutenin‐to‐gliadin ratio was maintained at 0.62 by adding gliadin. Rheological properties such as elongational, dynamic, and shear viscometric properties were determined. The presence of Glu‐D1 subunits (5+10) made a significantly larger contribution to dough properties than those encoded by Glu‐B1 (17+18), while subunit 1, encoded by Glu‐A1, made the least contribution to functionality. Results also confirmed that HMW‐GS contributed to strength and stability of dough.     

Effect of Variation in Amylose Content and Puroindoline Composition on Bread Quality in a Hard Spring Wheat Population

Milling and breadbaking quality of hard‐textured wheat may be influenced by alternative alleles at the Wx loci controlling percent amylose in the endosperm, and the puroindoline (pin) loci controlling grain hardness. For this experiment, we developed recombinant inbred lines (RIL) from a cross between Choteau spring wheat cultivar and experimental line MTHW9904. Choteau has the PinB‐D1b mutation conferring grain hardness and the Wx‐B1a allele at the Wx‐B1 locus conferring wild‐type amylose content. MTHW9904 has the PinA‐D1b allele conferring grain hardness and the Wx‐B1b allele conferring lower amylose content, causing a partial waxy phenotype. RIL with the PinB‐D1b mutation (n = 49) had significantly softer kernels, higher break flour yield, and higher loaf volume than lines with the PinA‐D1b mutation (n = 38). Lines with partial waxy phenotype due to Wx‐B1b (n = 43) had significantly lower kernel weight, lower amylose content, and higher flour swelling power than lines with wild‐type starch due to Wx‐B1a (n = 51). These results provide additional evidence for the positive effect of PinB‐D1b on bread quality in hard wheats, while genotype at Wx‐B1 was generally neutral for bread quality in this population. Interactions between the Pin and Wx loci were minimal.     

Occurrence of Puroindoline Alleles in Chinese Winter Wheats

Grain hardness is one of the most important characters that determine the end‐use quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mutations in genes encoding either puroindoline a (Pina) or b (Pinb) have been associated with hard grain texture, i.e., Pina null at Pina‐D1 or seven mutations at Pinb‐D1. In this study, the diversity of puroindoline alleles in 251 Chinese winter wheat cultivars and advanced lines from four major autumn‐planted wheat regions were investigated. Among the examined cultivars, 79 were classified as soft, while 53 were mixed in hardness, and 119 were uniformly hard. Of these hard winter wheats, three of the seven reported mutation types were observed, with Pina‐D1a/Pinb‐D1b being the dominant type for hard texture; 91 genotypes carried this allele. Sixteen genotypes had the Pina‐D1b allele, and two genotypes had the Pinb‐D1d allele. A new mutation, designated as Pinb‐D1p, was detected in 10 hard genotypes, with a single nucleotide (A) deletion corresponding to position 42 in the amino acid sequence of puroindoline b, involving a lysine (K) to asparagine (N) change, and leading to a shift in the open reading frame (ORF). This deletion disrupts the last part of the tryptophanrich domain, changing it from KWWK to NGGR, which is considered essential for the lipid‐binding activity of this protein, and results in a stop codon corresponding to position Pro‐60 in the amino acid sequence. The characterization of different hardness alleles provides useful information in understanding the mechanism underlying the formation of endosperm hardness while providing breeders the means of manipulating this important trait.     

Predicting Wheat Quality Characteristics and Functionality Using Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy

The accuracy of using near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) for predicting 186 grain, milling, flour, dough, and breadmaking quality parameters of 100 hard red winter (HRW) and 98 hard red spring (HRS) wheat and flour samples was evaluated. NIRS shows the potential for predicting protein content, moisture content, and flour color b* values with accuracies suitable for process control (R² > 0.97). Many other parameters were predicted with accuracies suitable for rough screening including test weight, average single kernel diameter and moisture content, SDS sedimentation volume, color a* values, total gluten content, mixograph, farinograph, and alveograph parameters, loaf volume, specific loaf volume, baking water absorption and mix time, gliadin and glutenin content, flour particle size, and the percentage of dark hard and vitreous kernels. Similar results were seen when analyzing data from either HRW or HRS wheat, and when predicting quality using spectra from either grain or flour. However, many attributes were correlated to protein content and this relationship influenced classification accuracies. When the influence of protein content was removed from the analyses, the only factors that could be predicted by NIRS with R² > 0.70 were moisture content, test weight, flour color, free lipids, flour particle size, and the percentage of dark hard and vitreous kernels. Thus, NIRS can be used to predict many grain quality and functionality traits, but mainly because of the high correlations of these traits to protein content.     

Mutagenesis‐Derived Puroindoline Alleles in Triticum aestivum and Their Impacts on Milling and Bread Quality

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) end‐product quality is impacted by grain hardness, which is determined by the Hardness locus consisting of the Puroindoline a and Puroindoline b genes, Pina and Pinb, respectively. Hard wheats commonly contain just one of two Pin mutations. We previously demonstrated the creation and preliminary hardness testing of 46 Pin missense alleles. In this study we examine the degree that individual Pin missense alleles confer unique milling and bread quality traits. Three Pina (PINA‐R103K, ‐G47S, and ‐P35S) and four Pinb (PINB‐D34N, ‐T38I, ‐G46D, and ‐E51K) missense alleles were chosen because they impart variable grain hardness levels, with one allele conferring soft seed texture, three conferring intermediate hardness (single‐kernel characterization system [SKCS] hardness approximately 50), and three conferring hard grain texture (SKCS hardness greater than 60). All but two of the alleles (PINA‐R103K and PINA‐G47S) resulted in higher total flour yield when compared with wild‐type controls. All hard and intermediate hardness alleles had decreased break flour yield, but intermediate hardness allele PINA‐P35S had higher break flour yield than common hard allele Pinb‐D1b. Intermediate and hard alleles resulted in increased abundance of larger and reduced levels of smaller flour particles. None of the missense alleles differed from their controls for loaf volume. The seven selected Pin alleles imparted defined levels of grain hardness and milling properties not previously available that may prove useful in wheat improvement.