An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a prototype equine metacarpal dynamic compression plate fixation with double dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVES: To compare the monotonic biomechanical properties of a prototype equine third metacarpal dynamic compression plate (EM-DCP) fixation with a double broad dynamic compression plate (DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. POPULATION: Twelve pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones. METHODS: Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (4 pairs each) for (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing, and (3) torsional testing. The EM-DCP (10-hole, 4.5 mm) was applied to the dorsal surface of one randomly selected bone from each pair. Two DCPs, 1 dorsally (10-hole, 4.5 mm broad) and 1 laterally (9-hole, 4.5 mm broad) were applied to the contralateral bone from each pair. All plates and screws were applied using standard AO/ASIF techniques to MC3 bones that had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: Mean 4-point bending yield load, yield bending moment, bending composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment of the EM-DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.0001) than those of the double broad DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure in 4-point bending of the EM-DCP fixation was significantly greater (P<.0008) than that of the double broad DCP fixation. Mean yield load, composite rigidity, and failure load in torsion of the EM-DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.0035) than that of the double broad DCP fixation. CONCLUSION: The EM-DCP provides increased stability in both static overload testing and cyclic fatigue testing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of this in vitro study support the conclusion that the prototype EM-DCP fixation is biomechanically superior to the double broad DCP fixation for the stabilization of osteotomized equine MC3.     

An in vitro evaluation of plate luting using osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones with a limited contact-dynamic compression plate

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of plate luting on the biomechanical properties of a broad limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones. STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by LC-DCP fixation, with 1 of the pair luted with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). ANIMAL POPULATION: Ten pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones. METHODS: Ten pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 2 test groups (5 pairs each) for (1) palmarodorsal 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing and (2) palmarodorsal 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing. The LC-DCP (8 hole, 4.5 mm) was applied to the dorsal surface of each pair of MC3 bones. All plates and screws were applied using standard AO/ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid-diaphyseal osteotomies. One of the matched pairs of LC-DCP-MC3 constructs were randomly chosen to be luted with PMMA. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group; significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: Mean palmarodorsal 4-point bending yield bending moment, failure bending moment of the LC-DCP fixation with luting was not significantly different (P>.05) than those of the LC-DCP fixation without luting. Mean cycles to failure for palmarodorsal 4-point bending was significantly (P<.0003) greater, with a 7.2-fold increase, for the LC-DCP fixation with luting compared with the LC-DCP fixation without luting. CONCLUSION: Luting the broad LC-DCP with PMMA in the fixation osteotomized equine MC3 bones increases the fatigue life of cyclic loading for palmarodorsal 4-point bending under the in vitro conditions studied. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cyclic fatigue data supports the conclusion that luted broad LC-DCP fixation is biomechanically superior to the non-luted broad LC-DCP fixation in osteotomized equine MC3 bones.     

In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

Objective— To compare monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a broad locking compression plate (LCP) fixation with a broad limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC‐DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. Study Design— In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid‐diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. Animal Population— Cadaveric adult equine MC3 bones (n=12 pairs). Methods— MC3 were divided into 3 groups (4 pairs each) for: (1) 4‐point bending single cycle to failure testing; (2) 4‐point bending cyclic fatigue testing; and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. The 8‐hole, 4.5 mm LCP was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. One 8‐hole, 4.5 mm LC‐DCP) was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. All plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid‐diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results— Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment, under 4‐point bending, single cycle to failure, of the LCP fixation were significantly greater than those of the LC‐DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure for 4‐point bending was significantly greater for the LCP fixation compared with LC‐DCP fixation. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load under torsional testing, single cycle to failure was significantly greater for the broad LCP fixation compared with the LC‐DCP fixation. Conclusion— The 4.5 mm LCP was superior to the 4.5 mm LC‐DCP in resisting the static overload forces (palmarodorsal 4‐point bending and torsional) and in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending. Clinical Relevance— The results of this in vitro study may provide information to aid in the selection of a biological plate for the repair of equine long bone fractures.     

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a 5.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation with a 4.5 mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

Objectives— To compare monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a 5.5 mm broad limited‐contact dynamic compression plate (5.5‐LC‐DCP) fixation with a 4.5 mm broad LC‐DCP (4.5‐LC‐DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. Study Design— In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid‐diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. Sample Population— Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=18 pair). Methods— MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (6 pairs each) for: (1) 4‐point bending single cycle to failure testing; (2) 4‐point bending cyclic fatigue testing; and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. The 8‐hole, 5.5 mm broad LC‐DCP (5.5‐LC‐DCP) was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. One 8‐hole, 4.5 mm broad LC‐DCP (4.5‐LC‐DCP) was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid‐diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t–test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results— Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment under 4‐point bending, single cycle to failure, of the 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation were significantly greater (P<.024) than those of the 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure for 4‐point bending was significantly (P<.05) greater for the 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation compared with the 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation. Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load in torsion for the 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation was not significantly different (P>.05) than those with the 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation. Conclusion— 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation was superior to 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation in resisting the static overload forces under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending. There was no significant difference between 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation and 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation in resisting static overload forces under torsion; however, the 5.5‐LC‐DCP offers significantly less stability (80% of that of the 4.5‐LC‐DCP) in cyclic fatigue testing. Clinical Relevance— The results of this in vitro study may provide information to aid in the selection of a biological plate for long bone fracture repair in horses.     

An in vitro biomechanical comparison between prototype tapered shaft cortical bone screws and AO cortical bone screws for an equine metacarpal dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVES: To compare biomechanical properties of a prototype 5.5 mm tapered shaft cortical screw (TSS) and 5.5 mm AO cortical screw for an equine third metacarpal dynamic compression plate (EM-DCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. STUDY DESIGN: Paired in vitro biomechanical testing of cadaveric equine MC3 with a mid-diaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. ANIMAL POPULATION: Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=12 pairs). METHODS: Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 groups (4 pairs each) for (1) 4-point bending single cycle to failure testing, (2) 4-point bending cyclic fatigue testing, and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. An EM-DCP (10-hole, 4.5 mm) was applied to the dorsal surface of each, mid-diaphyseal osteotomized, MC3 pair. For each MC3 bone pair, 1 was randomly chosen to have the EM-DCP secured with four 5.5 mm TSS (2 screws proximal and distal to the osteotomy; TSS construct), two 5.5 mm AO cortical screws (most proximal and distal holes in the plate) and four 4.5 mm AO cortical screws in the remaining holes. The control construct (AO construct) had four 5.5 mm AO cortical screws to secure the EM-DCP in the 2 holes proximal and distal to the osteotomy in the contralateral bone from each pair. The remaining holes of the EM-DCP were filled with two 5.5 mm AO cortical screws (most proximal and distal holes in the plate) and four 4.5 mm AO cortical screws. All plates and screws were applied using standard AO/ASIF techniques. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: Mean 4-point bending yield load, yield bending moment, bending composite rigidity, failure load and failure bending moment of the TSS construct were significantly greater (P<.00004 for yield and P<.00001 for failure loads) than those of the AO construct. Mean cycles to failure in 4-point bending of the TSS construct was significantly greater (P<.0002) than that of the AO construct. The mean yield load and composite rigidity in torsion of the TSS construct were significantly greater (P<.0039 and P<.00003, respectively) than that of the AO construct. CONCLUSION: The TSS construct provides increased stability in both static overload testing and cyclic fatigue testing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this in vitro study support the conclusion that the EM-DCP fixation using the prototype 5.5 mm TSS is biomechanically superior to the EM-DCP fixation using 5.5 mm AO cortical screws for the stabilization of osteotomized equine MC3.     

In vitro biomechanical comparison of dynamic compression plates with a rough contact surface and a polished contact surface for fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones

Objectives: To compare the number of cycles to failure of 4.5 mm broad dynamic compression plates (DCP), 4.5 mm broad limited‐contact dynamic compression plates (4.5‐LC‐DCP), and 5.5 mm broad limited‐contact dynamic compression plates (5.5‐LC‐DCP) having a rough (denoted by a prefix R‐) versus a standard smooth contact surface for the fixation of osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones. Study Design: Experimental. Animal Population: Fifteen pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones. Methods: Fifteen pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (5 pairs each) for comparison of (1) R‐DCP fixation with DCP fixation, (2) R‐4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation with 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation, and (3) R‐5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation with 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation to repair osteotomized equine MC3 bones under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending cyclic fatigue testing. For each group an 8‐hole plate with rough contact surface was applied to the dorsal surface of one randomly selected bone from each pair and a corresponding 8‐hole plate with smooth contact surface was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair. All plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had mid‐diaphyseal osteotomies. Mean number of cycles to failure for each method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Mean cycles to failure ± standard deviation was significantly greater for the R‐DCP fixation (230,025 ± 23,129) compared with the DCP fixation (103,451 ± 14,556), for the R‐4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation (99,237 ± 14,390) compared with the 4.5‐LC‐DCP fixation (46,464 ± 6325) and for the R‐5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation (65,113 ± 7796) compared with the 5.5‐LC‐DCP fixation (34,224 ± 3835). Conclusion: For the fixation of osteotomized MC3 bones, the constructs with plates having rough contact surface were superior to the corresponding constructs with plates having standard smooth contact surfaces in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending.     

In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a Modified 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones

Objectives: To compare number of cycles to failure for palmarodorsal 4‐point bending of a modified 5.5 mm broad locking compression plate (M5.5‐LCP) fixation with a 5.5 mm broad LCP (5.5‐LCP) fixation used to repair osteotomized equine third metacarpal (MC3) bones. Study Design: In vitro biomechanical testing. Animal Population: Adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones (n=6 pairs). Methods: An 8‐hole, M5.5‐LCP, obtained by having a 1.0 mm thickness removed from the bone contact portion of the 5.5‐LCP, was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected MC3 from each pair, and an 8‐hole, 5.5‐LCP was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair using a combination of cortical and locking screws. Plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques to MC3 bones with a mid‐diaphyseal osteotomy. MC3 constructs had palmarodorsal 4‐point bending cyclic fatigue testing. Mean cycles to failure for each method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Mean±SD cycles to failure of the M5.5‐LCP fixation (188,641±17,971) was significantly greater than that of the 5.5‐LCP fixation (166,497±15,539). Conclusion: M5.5‐LCP fixation was superior to 5.5‐LCP fixation of osteotomized equine MC3 bones in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending. Clinical Relevance: This suggests that biological plate fixation is not the ideal choice for osteotomized equine MC3 bones.     

An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of a 5.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation with a 4.5 mm Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Osteotomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones

Objectives: To compare the monotonic biomechanical properties and fatigue life of a 5.5‐mm‐broad locking compression plate (5.5 LCP) fixation with a 4.5‐mm‐broad locking compression plate (4.5 LCP) fixation to repair osteotomized equine 3rd metacarpal (MC3) bones. Study Design: In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine MC3 with a middiaphyseal osteotomy, stabilized by 1 of 2 methods for fracture fixation. Animal Population: Fifteen pairs of adult equine cadaveric MC3 bones. Methods: Fifteen pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 3 test groups (5 pairs each) for (1) 4‐point bending single cycle to failure testing, (2) 4‐point bending cyclic fatigue testing, and (3) torsional single cycle to failure testing. An 8‐hole, 5.5 LCP was applied to the dorsal surface of 1 randomly selected bone from each pair and an 8‐hole, 4.5 LCP was applied dorsally to the contralateral bone from each pair using a combination of cortical and locking screws. All plates and screws were applied using standard ASIF techniques. All MC3 bones had middiaphyseal osteotomies. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group with significance set at P<.05. Results: Mean yield load, yield bending moment, composite rigidity, failure load, and failure bending moment, under 4‐point bending, single cycle to failure, of the 5.5 LCP fixation were significantly greater than those of the 4.5 LCP fixation. Mean cycles to failure in 4‐point bending of the 5.5 LCP fixation (170,535±19,166) was significantly greater than that of the 4.5 LCP fixation (129,629±14,054). Mean yield load, mean composite rigidity, and mean failure load under torsional testing, single cycle to failure was significantly greater for the broad 5.5 LCP fixation compared with the 4.5 LCP fixation. In single cycle to failure under torsion, the mean±SD values for the 5.5 LCP and the 4.5 LCP fixation techniques, respectively, were: yield load, 151.4±19.6 and 97.6±12.1 N m; composite rigidity, 790.3±58.1 and 412.3±28.1 N m/rad; and failure load: 162.1±20.2 and 117.9±14.6 N m. Conclusion: The 5.5 LCP was superior to the 4.5 LCP in resisting static overload forces (palmarodorsal 4‐point bending and torsional) and in resisting cyclic fatigue under palmarodorsal 4‐point bending. Clinical Relevance: These in vitro study results may provide information to aid in selection of an LCP for repair of equine long bone fractures.     

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of two interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpal bones

OBJECTIVE--To compare the mechanical properties of 2 interlocking-nail systems for fixation of ostectomized equine third metacarpi (MC3): (1) a standard interlocking nail with 2 parallel screws proximal and distal to a 1-cm ostectomy; and (2) a modified interlocking nail with 2 screws proximal and distal to a 1-cm ostectomy with the screws offset by 30 degrees. ANIMAL OR SAMPLE POPULATION--Twelve pairs of adult equine forelimbs intact from the midradius distally. METHODS--Twelve pairs of equine MC3 were divided into 2 test groups (6 pairs each): torsion and caudocranial 4-point bending. Standard interlocking nails (6-hole, 13-mm diameter, 230-mm length) were placed in 1 randomly selected bone from each pair. Modified interlocking nails (6-hole, 13-mm, 230-mm length, screw holes offset by 30 degrees) were placed in the contralateral bone from each pair. All bones had 1-cm mid-diaphyseal ostectomies. Six construct pairs were tested in caudocranial 4-point bending to determine stiffness and failure properties. The remaining 6 construct pairs were tested in torsion to determine torsional stiffness and yield load. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t test within each group. Significance was set at P <.05. RESULTS--Mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-standard interlocking-nail composite and the MC3-modified interlocking-nail composite, respectively, in 4-point bending were: composite rigidity, 3,119 +/- 334.5 Nm/rad (newton. meter/radian) and 3,185 +/- 401.2 Nm/rad; yield bending moment, 205.0 +/- 18.46 Nm and 186.7 +/- 6.17 Nm; and failure bending moment, 366.4 +/- 21.82 Nm and 378.1 +/- 20.41 Nm. There were no significant differences in the biomechanical values for bending between the 2 fixation methods. In torsion, mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-standard interlocking-nail composite and the MC3-modified interlocking-nail composite were: composite rigidity, 135.5 +/- 7.128 Nm/rad and 112.5 +/- 7.432 Nm/rad; gap stiffness, 207.6 +/- 10.57 Nm/rad and 181.7 +/- 12.89 Nm/rad; and yield load, 123.3 +/- 2.563 Nm and 107.5 +/- 8.353 Nm, respectively. Composite rigidity and gap stiffness for standard interlocking-nail fixations were significantly higher than the modified interlocking-nail fixation technique in torsion. Yield load had a tendency to be higher for the standard interlocking-nail fixation (P =.15). CONCLUSIONS--No significant differences in biomechanical properties were identified between a standard interlocking nail and one with the screw holes offset by 30 degrees in caudocranial 4-point bending. The standard interlocking nail was superior to the modified interlocking nail in torsional gap stiffness and composite rigidity. The torsional yield load also tended to be higher for the standard interlocking nail. CLINICAL RELEVANCE--The standard interlocking nail with parallel screw holes is superior to a modified interlocking nail with the screw holes offset by 30 degrees in ostectomized equine MC3 bones in vitro when tested in torsion.     

Comparison of limited-contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate constructs for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis in the horse

This study compared in vitro monotonic and cyclic mechanical properties of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodeses stabilized using an open or closed technique combined with axial 4.5 mm narrow limited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) or 4.5 mm narrow locking compression plate (LCP). Ten forelimb pairs were randomly assigned to LCP or LC-DCP groups. One limb in each pair was assigned to either open or closed technique. Limbs were tested for cyclic fatigue at 20 000 cycles and then single-cycle to failure under 3-point dorsopalmar bending. There was no significant difference in stiffness of constructs during cyclic fatigue testing or on force or stiffness at failure in single cycle to failure testing between open and closed techniques or between plate types. Both implants, surgical technique, or combinations thereof are suitable for clinical use. More work is necessary to define the interaction between implant type and surgical technique.     

In vitro biomechanical comparison of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: prototype equine spoon plate versus axially positioned dynamic compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws inserted in lag fashion

Objectives— To compare in vitro monotonic biomechanical properties of an equine spoon plate (ESP) with an axial 3‐hole, 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression plate (DCP) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws (DCP‐TLS) inserted in lag fashion for equine proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis. Study Design— Paired in vitro biomechanical testing of 2 methods of stabilizing cadaveric adult equine forelimb PIP joints. Animal Population— Cadaveric adult equine forelimbs (n=18 pairs). Methods— For each forelimb pair, 1 PIP joint was stabilized with an ESP (8 hole, 4.5 mm) and 1 with an axial 3‐hole narrow DCP (4.5 mm) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion. Six matching pairs of constructs were tested in single cycle to failure under axial compression with load applied under displacement control at a constant rate of 5 cm/s. Six construct pairs were tested for cyclic fatigue under axial compression with cyclic load (0–7.5 kN) applied at 6 Hz; cycles to failure were recorded. Six construct pairs were tested in single cycle to failure under torsional loading applied at a constant displacement rate (0.17 radians/s) until rotation of 0.87 radians occurred. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group with statistical significance set at P<.05. Results— Mean yield load, yield stiffness, and failure load for ESP fixation were significantly greater (for axial compression and torsion) than for DCP‐TLS fixation. Mean (± SD) values for the ESP and DCP‐TLS fixation techniques, respectively, in single cycle to failure under axial compression were: yield load 123.9 ± 8.96 and 28.5 ± 3.32 kN; stiffness, 13.11 ± 0.242 and 2.60 ± 0.17 kN/cm; and failure load, 144.4 ± 13.6 and 31.4 ± 3.8 kN. In single cycle to failure under torsion, mean (± SD) values for ESP and DCP‐TLS, respectively, were: stiffness 2,022 ± 26.2 and 107.9 ± 11.1 N m/rad; and failure load: 256.4 ± 39.2 and 87.1 ± 11.5 N m. Mean cycles to failure in axial compression of ESP fixation (622,529 ± 65,468) was significantly greater than DCP‐TLS (95,418 ± 11,037). Conclusion— ESP was superior to an axial 3‐hole narrow DCP with 2 abaxial transarticular screws inserted in lag fashion in resisting static overload forces and cyclic fatigue. Clinical Relevance— In vitro results support further evaluation of ESP for PIP joint arthrodesis in horses. Its specific design may provide increased stability without need for external coaptation support.     

A mechanical comparison of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: an axial locking compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws versus an axial dynamic compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws

Objectives: To compare in vitro monotonic biomechanical properties of an axial 3‐hole, 4.5 mm narrow locking compression plate (ELCP) using 5.0 mm locking screws and 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion (ELCP–TLS) with an axial 3‐hole, 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression plate (DCP) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion (DCP–TLS) for equine proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis. Design: Experimental. Animal Population: Cadaveric adult equine forelimbs (n=18 pairs). Methods: For each forelimb pair, 1 PIP joint was stabilized with an axial ELCP using 5.0 mm locking screws and 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion and 1 PIP joint with an axial 3‐hole narrow DCP (4.5 mm) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion. Six matching pairs of constructs were tested in single cycle to failure under axial compression, 6 construct pairs were tested for cyclic fatigue under axial compression, and 6 construct pairs were tested in single cycle to failure under torsional loading. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group with statistical significance set at P<.05. Results: Mean yield load, yield stiffness, and failure load under axial compression, single cycle to failure, of the DCP–TLS fixation were significantly greater than those of the LCP–TLS fixation. There was no significant difference between the mean number of cycles to failure in axial compression of the LCP–TLS and the DCP–TLS fixations. Mean yield load, yield stiffness, and failure load under torsion, single cycle to failure, of the LCP–TLS fixation were significantly greater than those of the DCP–TLS fixation. Conclusion: The DCP–TLS construct provided significantly greater stability under axial compression in single cycle to failure than the ELCP–TLS construct, the ELCP–TLS construct provided significantly greater stability under torsional loading in single cycle to failure than the DCP–TLS construct, and there was no significant difference in stability between the 2 constructs for cyclic loading under axial compression.     

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of a prototype intramedullary pin-plate with a dynamic compression plate for equine metacarpophalangeal arthrodesis

OBJECTIVES : To compare the biomechanical properties of a prototype intramedullary pin-plate (IMPP) implant specifically designed for equine metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthrodesis with a dynamic compression plate (DCP) system. STUDY DESIGN : In vitro biomechanical testing of paired cadaveric equine forelimbs with a simulated traumatic disruption of the suspensory apparatus, stabilized by one of two methods for MCP arthrodesis. ANIMAL POPULATION : Twenty-one pairs of adult equine cadaveric forelimbs. METHODS : Each forelimb had the distal sesamoidean ligaments severed to create a disrupted suspensory apparatus. For each forelimb pair, the MCP joint was stabilized with the IMPP in one limb, and a DCP in the other limb. Seven matching limb pairs were tested in axial compression in a single cycle to failure, 7 matching limb pairs were tested in torsion in a single cycle to failure, and 7 matching limb pairs were fatigued tested in axial compression. Mean test variable values for each method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS : The mean yield load, yield stiffness, and failure load (axial compression, torsional loading) was significantly greater for the IMPP compared with the DCP system. Mean cycles to failure for axial compression was significantly greater for the IMPP compared with the DCP system. Significance in all tests was P<.0001. CONCLUSION : The IMPP was superior to the DCP system in resisting the biomechanical forces most likely to cause failure of MCP joint arthrodesis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE : The IMPP implant should be considered for MCP arthrodesis in horses with traumatic disruption of the suspensory apparatus. The specific design of the IMPP implant may facilitate equine MCP arthrodesis and avoid convalescent complications related to cyclic fatigue.     

Comparison of double dynamic compression plating versus two configurations of an internal veterinary fixation device: Results of in vitro mechanical testing using a bone substitute

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical properties of 2 configurations of a veterinary fixation system (VFS) for large animal long bones with dynamic compression plating (DCP). SAMPLE POPULATION: Eighteen pairs of Canevasit tubes (Canevasit; Amsler und Frei, Schinznach Dorf, Switzerland) (length, 170 mm; diameter, 47.5 mm; cortex thickness, 10 mm), aligned with a 10-mm gap, and stabilized with 2 DCP or 2 VFS implants. METHODS: Three groups (n = 6) were compared. Group 1 Canevasit tubes were stabilized with two 10-hole, broad 4.5-mm stainless steel DCP applied with both plates centered over the gap, in orthogonal planes parallel to the long axis of the tubes and staggered to allow bicortical fixation with ten 4.5-mm, 52-mm-long cortex screws each. Group 2 tubes were stabilized similarly with 2 VFS implants, each composed of a stainless steel rod (length, 167 mm; diameter, 8 mm), and 10 clamps were applied in alternating fashion left and right on the rod and fixed bicortically with ten 4.5-mm, 52-mm-long, cortex screws. Group 3 tubes were stabilized similarly, but using only 6 clamps/rod. All groups were tested initially in torsion within elastic limits and subsequently in 4-point bending, with 1 implant on the tension side, until gap closure occurred. RESULTS: None of the constructs failed, but all had plastic deformation after 4-point bending. No statistically significant differences were found among the 3 groups in torsional stiffness. Double DCP fixation was significantly stiffer and stronger in 4-point bending, compared with both configurations of double VFS fixation. CONCLUSIONS: The plate design was favored in this study. The VFS system may have to be adapted before further tests are conducted. Test modalities have to be chosen closer to clinical conditions (real bone, cyclic loading, closed gap). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The veterinary fixation system has not yet proven its advantages for large animal long bone fracture repair. From the pure mechanical point of view, double DCP is the favored method for the treatment mentioned.     

An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of an Interlocking Nail System and Dynamic Compression Plate Fixation of Ostectomized Equine Third Metacarpal Bones

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical properties of two stabilization methods for ostectomized equine third metacarpi (MC3): (1) an interlocking nail system and (2) two dynamic compression plates. Animal or Sample Population-Ten pairs of adult equine forelimbs intact from the midradius distally. METHODS: Ten pairs of equine MC3 were divided into two test groups (five pairs each): caudocranial four-point bending and torsion. Interlocking nails (6 hole, 13-mm diameter, 230-mm length) were placed in one randomly selected bone from each pair. Two dynamic compression plates one dorsally (12 hole, 4.5-mm broad) and one laterally (10 hole, 4.5-mm broad) were attached to the contralateral bone from each pair. All bones had 1 cm mid-diaphyseal ostectomies. Five construct pairs were tested in caudocranial four-point bending to determine stiffness and failure properties. The remaining five construct pairs were tested in torsion to determine torsional stiffness and yield load. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t-test within each group. Significance was set at P<.05. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-interlocking nail composite and the MC3-double plate composite, respectively, in four-point bending were: composite rigidity, 3,454+/-407.6 Nm/rad and 3,831+/-436.5 Nm/rad; yield bending moment, 276.4+/-40.17 Nm and 433.75+/-83.99 Nm; failure bending moment, 526.3+/-105.9 Nm and 636.2+/-27.77 Nm. There was no significant difference in the biomechanical values for bending between the two fixation methods. In torsion, mean (+/-SEM) values for the MC3-interlocking nail composite and the MC3-double plate composite were: composite rigidity, 124.1+/-16.61 Nm/rad and 262.4+/-30.51 Nm/rad; gap stiffness, 222.3+/-47.32 Nm/rad and 1,557+/-320.9 Nm/rad; yield load, 94.77+/-7.822 Nm and 130.66+/-20.27 Nm, respectively. Composite rigidity, gap stiffness, and yield load for double plate fixation were significantly higher compared with interlocking nail fixation in torsion. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in biomechanical properties were identified between an interlocking nail and double plating techniques for stabilization of ostectomized equine MC3 in caudocranial four-point bending. Double plating fixation was superior to interlocking nail fixation in torsion.     

An in vitro biomechanical study of bone plate and interlocking nail in a canine diaphyseal femoral fracture model

OBJECTIVE: To compare the structural properties and the interfragmentary motion in ostectomized canine femurs stabilized with either an 8-mm interlocking nail system (IN) or a 10-hole dynamic compression broad plate (DCP). ANIMAL OR SAMPLE POPULATION: Ten pairs of adult canine femurs with a 25-mm mid-diaphyseal gap. METHODS: Bone specimens were divided into 2 groups (10 femurs each). Left femurs were stabilized with a DCP and 8 bicortical screws; right femurs were stabilized with an IN and 3 screws. Mechanical tests were performed in eccentric axial loading and in craniocaudal bending. The testing was first conducted nondestructively and then until breakage. Structural properties, ie, stiffness, yield limits, and failure limits, were determined. Interfragmentary motion was measured during nondestructive tests with the use of an optoelectronic device. Axial, transverse, and rotational motions were calculated. Mean values of stiffness, yield and failure limits, and axial and shear motions for each fixation method were compared using a paired t test within each group (P <.05). RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) values of stiffness and failure limit were significantly higher for IN constructs than for DCP constructs in compression, while there was little difference in the results between each tested group in bending. Mean yield load values were significantly higher for IN than for DCP specimens in compression as well as in bending. The axial-motion analysis revealed significant differences between IN and DCP groups during bending tests only. The highest score of transverse motion at the gap was recorded during bending tests, and was higher for DCP than for IN specimens. There were insignificant differences between the two groups with regard to rotation around the diaphyseal axis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Structural properties and interfragmentary shear motion analysis demonstrated a much higher rigidity in the IN-bone than in the DCP-bone constructs.     

Arthrodesis of the Equine Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: A Biomechanical Comparison of Two 7-Hole 3.5-mm Broad and Two 5-hole 4.5-mm Narrow Dynamic Compression Plates

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biomechanical characteristics and mode of failure of two different dynamic compression plate (DCP) techniques for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthrodesis in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized block-design blocking on horse (1-5), method of fixation (two 7-hole, 3.5-mm broad DCP vs two 5-hole, 4.5-mm narrow DCP), side (left, right), and end (front, hind). Constructs were loaded to failure in 3-point bending in a dorsal-to-palmar (plantar) direction. SAMPLE POPULATION: Ten paired limbs from 5 equine cadavers. METHODS: Two 7-hole, 3.5-mm broad dynamic compression plates (bDCP) were used in 1 limb of a pair, and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates (nDCP) were used on the contralateral limb. Plates were positioned abaxially across the dorsomedial and dorsolateral aspect of the PIPJ. Arthrodesis constructs were loaded (19 mm/s) in 3-point bending in a dorsal-to-palmar (plantar) direction using a materials-testing machine. Composite stiffness, yield point, and maximal bending moment at failure were obtained from bending moment-angular deformation curves. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, X(2) analysis, and Fisher's exact tests; the power of the test was calculated when differences were not significant. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in composite stiffness (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 21.9%), yield point (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 34.4%), or maximal bending moment (P >.05; power = 0.8 @ delta = 17.8%) between the two fixation techniques. For bDCP constructs, 11% (15 of 140) of the 3.5-mm screws were damaged; 7 of the screw heads pulled through plates where the plates bent, 1 screw head broke off, and 7 screws were bent or pulled out of the phalanx. For nDCP constructs, 8% (8 of 100) of the 4.5-mm screws were damaged; 1 screw head pulled through a plate, 1 screw head broke off, and 6 screws were bent or pulled out of the phalanx. CONCLUSIONS: There were no biomechanical or failure differences between bDCP and nDCP fixation of the PIPJ in horses when evaluated in single-cycle 3-point bending to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is no biomechanical advantage to the use of two 7-hole, 3.5-mm bDCP in equine proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis compared with two 5-hole, 4.5-mm nDCP. Two 5-hole, 4.5-mm nDCP may be easier to place, whereas two 7-hole, 3.5-mm bDCP may provide more versatility in fracture repair.     

In vitro comparison of three fixation methods for humeral fracture repair in adult horses

The stiffness, load to failure, and bending moments of adult intact equine humeri and humeri repaired with 3 fixation techniques were determined in vitro. Bones were tested in axial compression (30 pairs), mediolateral 3-point bending (15 pairs), and caudocranial 3-point bending (15 pairs). An oblique osteotomy of 1 humerus of each pair was performed to simulate the long spiral oblique fractures that occur clinically in horses. Bones were repaired in 3 ways: group 1--nylon band cerclage fixation (20 bones); group 2--multiple intramedullary pinning (20 bones); and group 3--nylon band cerclage fixation and multiple intramedullary pinning (20 bones). Intact bones were significantly (P less than 0.05) stronger than repaired bones in each testing mode. Bones repaired with bands only were significantly less stiff in bending than were bones repaired with pins only or with pins and bands. In compression, only specimens repaired with pins and bands were significantly stiffer than were bones repaired with bands only. Bones repaired with bands only required significantly less load to failure in compression and in caudocranial bending than did bones repaired with pins only or with pins and bands. Bones repaired with pins only deformed through the full displacement of the actuator (5 cm), and pins deformed plastically. Bones repaired with pins and bands were stiffer and had higher bending moments than did bones repaired with pins only, but the differences were not significant.     

An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison of Equine Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Techniques: An Axial Positioned Dynamic Compression Plate and Two Abaxial Transarticular Cortical Screws Inserted in Lag Fashion Versus Three Parallel Transarticular Cortical Screws Inserted in Lag Fashion

Objectives— To compare in vitro monotonic biomechanical properties of an axial 3‐hole, 4.5 mm narrow dynamic compression plate (DCP) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion (DCP‐TLS) with 3 parallel transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion (3‐TLS) for the equine proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis. Study Design— Paired in vitro biomechanical testing of 2 methods of stabilizing cadaveric adult equine forelimb PIP joints. Sample Population— Cadaveric adult equine forelimbs (n=15 pairs). Methods— For each forelimb pair, 1 PIP joint was stabilized with an axial 3‐hole narrow DCP (4.5 mm) using 5.5 mm cortical screws in conjunction with 2 abaxial transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion and 1 with 3 parallel transarticular 5.5 mm cortical screws inserted in lag fashion. Five matching pairs of constructs were tested in single cycle to failure under axial compression, 5 construct pairs were tested for cyclic fatigue under axial compression, and 5 construct pairs were tested in single cycle to failure under torsional loading. Mean values for each fixation method were compared using a paired t‐test within each group with statistical significance set at P<.05. Results— Mean yield load, yield stiffness, and failure load under axial compression and torsion, single cycle to failure, of the DCP‐TLS fixation were significantly greater than those of the 3‐TLS fixation. Mean cycles to failure in axial compression of the DCP‐TLS fixation was significantly greater than that of the 3‐TLS fixation. Conclusion— The DCP‐TLS was superior to the 3‐TLS in resisting the static overload forces and in resisting cyclic fatigue. Clinical Relevance— The results of this in vitro study may provide information to aid in the selection of a treatment modality for arthrodesis of the equine PIP joint.     

An in vitro biomechanical investigation of an MP35N intramedullary interlocking nail system for repair of third metacarpal fractures in adult horses

OBJECTIVE: To compare monotonic mechanical properties of gap-ostectomized third metacarpal bones (MC3) stabilized with an MP35N interlocking nail system with contralateral intact bones. ANIMALS OR SAMPLE POPULATION: Twenty-four pairs of cadaveric equine MC3s. METHODS: Third metacarpal bones were divided into 4 mechanical testing groups (6 pairs per group): compression, palmarodorsal (PD) and mediolateral (ML) 4-point bending, and torsion. One MC3 from each pair was randomly selected as an intact specimen, and the contralateral gap ostectomized bone was stabilized with a 4-hole, 14-mm-diameter, 250-mm-long, MP35N intramedullary nail, and four, 7-mm-diameter, 60-mm-long MP35N interlocking screws (constructs). Mechanical testing properties were compared between intact specimens and constructs with a paired t test (significance set at P <.05). RESULTS: Intact specimens were significantly stronger and stiffer than constructs in all testing modes except PD bending. Constructs achieved mean yield strengths that were 57% (compression), 81% (PD bending), 68% (ML bending), and 78% (torque) of intact specimens. Constructs achieved mean stiffnesses that were 53% (compression), 58% (PD bending), 41% (ML bending), and 47% (torque) of intact specimens. CONCLUSION: Monotonic yield mechanical properties of MP35N intramedullary interlocking nail-stabilized, gap-ostectomized MC3 were lower than those of paired intact bones but exceeded reported in vivo loads for dorsopalmar bending and compression and estimated in vivo torsional loads. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering the benefits associated with intramedullary interlocking nail fixation of fractures, this system should be considered for use for repair of MC3 fractures with applicable fracture configurations.