The geographic distribution of carcinomas of the small intestine in New Zealand sheep

A sample survey of anthelmintic usage and farmers' drenching policies was conducted on 614 sheep farms, in the North and South Islands, selected from among those carrying 1500 or more breeding ewes. The survey was based on information for the 1978/79 and 1979/80 farming years recorded on questionnaires completed during personal interviews between Livestock Officers and the farmers concerned.

Results show that there were no significant between-Island differences in mean drenching frequencies for any age class of sheep. In 1979/80, the overall New Zealand drenching frequencies were 6.3 for lambs, 1.8 for 1-2-year-olds and 1.2 for sheep older than 2 years. Of the farmers surveyed, 20% did not drench 1-2-year-old sheep and 29% did not drench sheep older than 2 years.

There were also no between-Island differences in timing of drenches and alternation of drench brands. Sixty-nine per cent of the farmers followed a pre-determined drenching programme whereas 27% stated that they drenched if and when necessary. For lambs, some drenching was carried out in all months of the year but fewer farmers drenched during the mid-winter to mid-spring period (July-October). Older stock were drenched in all months also but there was a general acceptance by farmers of the practices of pre-tupping and pre- or post-lambing drenching.

At the time of the survey, 48% of the farmers were using three or more brands of drench with a maximum of nine. Analysis of data relating to brands of drench used shows that whereas 39% of the farmers were alternating drench families [i.e. benzimidazoles (BZ) c.f. non-benzimidazoles (NBZ)] within a single farming year, only 3% were practising a strict alternation of drench families between years.

General comments by the farmers surveyed indicate a disturbing degree of misunderstanding and misconception regarding the properties and limitations of current anthelmintics. The survey also revealed a lack of appreciation of the rationale of prophylactic (‘preventive’) parasite control. These aspects are discussed in relation to currently recommended control strategies and the problem of anthelmintic resistance.     

A survey of anthelmintic usage for sheep: a time for change

A sample survey of anthelmintic usage and farmers; drenching policies was conducted on 614 sheep farms, in the North and South Islands, selected from among those carrying 1500 or more breeding ewes. The survey was based on information for the 1978179 and 1979/80 farming years recorded on questionnaires completed during personal interviews between Livestock Officers and the farmers concerned. Results show that there were no significant between-Island differences in mean drenching frequencies for any age class of sheep. In 1979/80, the overall New Zealand drenching frequencies were 6.3 for lambs, 1.8 for 1-2-year-olds and 1.2 for sheep older than 2 years. Of the farmers surveyed, 20% did not drench 1-2-year-old sheep and 29% did not drench sheep older than 2 years. There were also no between-Island differences in timing of drenches and alternation of drench brands. Sixty-nine per cent of the farmers followed a pre-determined drenching programme whereas 27% stated that they drenched if and when necessary. For lambs, some drenching was carried out in all months of the year hut fewer farmers drenched during the mid-winter to mid-spring period (July-October). Older stock were drenched in all months also but there was a general acceptance by farmers of the practices of pre-tupping and pre or post-lambing drenching. At the time of the survey, 48% of the farmers were using three or more brands of drench with a maximum of nine. Analysis of data relating to brands of drench used shows that whereas 39% of the farmers w,ere alternating drench families [i.e. benzimidazoles (BZ) c.f. non-benzimidazoles (NBZ)] within a single farming year, only 3% were practising a strict alternation of drench families between years. General comments by the farmers surveyed indicate a disturbing degree of misunderstanding and misconception regarding the properties and limitations of current anthelmintics. The survey also revealed a lack of appreciation of the rationale of prophylactic (;preventive;) parasite control. These aspects are discussed in relation to currently recommended control strategies and the problem of anthelmintic resistance.     

Management of gastrointestinal nematode parasites on sheep farms in New Zealand

AIM: To report current farmer opinions and farming practices relating to control of gastrointestinal nematodes and anthelmintic resistance on sheep farms in New Zealand. METHODS: An interview-based cross-sectional study of grazing management and anthelmintic usage was conducted by veterinarians on 80 randomly selected sheep farms in New Zealand. RESULTS: Useable data were returned by 74/80 (92%) farmers who participated in the study. However, despite contacting 400 farmers the target sample size of 100 farms was not reached. The results indicated that only 31% of farms had previously tested for drench resistance, that effective quarantine-drenching of imported stock was not always carried out, and that farmers were more likely to integrate cattle than ewes into their grazing management of lambs. Furthermore, the number of drenches given to lambs had changed little in 25 years. The use of faecal egg counting by farmers has increased. CONCLUSIONS: Dependence on anthelmintics continues to be high on sheep farms in New Zealand. Whilst the number of drench treatments has changed little, there is more widespread use of persistent or long-acting treatments. Farmers need to be encouraged to monitor the resistance status of nematode populations on their farms and use this information to develop strategies aimed at maintaining susceptible alleles within the parasite populations and conserving the efficacy of existing drug families.     

Management of gastrointestinal nematode parasites on sheep farms in New Zealand

AIM: To report current farmer opinions and farming practices relating to control of gastrointestinal nematodes and anthelmintic resistance on sheep farms in New Zealand.

METHODS: An interview-based cross-sectional study of grazing management and anthelmintic useage was conducted by veterinarians on 80 randomly selected sheep farms in New Zealand.

RESULTS: Useable data were returned by 74/80 (92%) farmers who participated in the study. However, despite contacting 400 farmers the target sample size of 100 farms was not reached. The results indicated that only 31% of farms had previously tested for drench resistance, that effective quarantine-drenching of imported stock was not always carried out, and that farmers were more likely to integrate cattle than ewes into their grazing management of lambs. Furthermore, the number of drenches given to lambs had changed little in 25 years. The use of faecal egg counting by farmers has increased.

CONCLUSIONS: Dependence on anthelmintics continues to be high on sheep farms in New Zealand. Whilst the number of drench treatments has changed little, there is more widespread use of persistent or long-acting treatments. Farmers need to be encouraged to monitor the resistance status of nematode populations on their farms and use this information to develop strategies aimed at maintaining susceptible alleles within the parasite populations and conserving the efficacy of existing drug families.     

The effective life of ivermectin on Western Australian sheep farms--a survival analysis

A mail survey of 235 Western Australian sheep farmers who had performed faecal egg count reduction tests for anthelmintic resistance in 1999 or 2000 was conducted, with some telephone follow-up. A response of 56% was achieved. Resistance to ivermectin, a member of the macrocyclic lactone class of anthelmintics, had developed on 44% of the farms surveyed. We used time to occurrence of resistance to ascertain factors that contributed to extending the time ivermectin remained an effective drench on these farms (median time = 10.5 years). This time was significantly longer when farmers implemented more worm control practices on their farms (P = 0.003). We developed a multivariable survival model that contained the following main effects: reduced winter drenching frequency, 0–2 flock treatments in 5 years (hazard ratio (HR) 0.52); availability of alternative effective anthelmintic classes on the farm (HR 0.30); always using safe pastures (HR 0.23); and veterinarians as the primary source of worm control advice (HR 0.58). The relationship of these findings to the understanding of anthelmintic resistance is discussed.     

Observations on the emergence of multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep flocks in the south-east of Scotland

Multiple resistance to benzimidazole, imidazothiazole and macrocyclic lactone anthelmintics is an emerging problem in the south-east of Scotland. The general management and nematode control strategies employed in four affected flocks (flocks 1-4) were investigated in an attempt to identify the risk factors which might have led to the appearance of production limiting disease associated with anthelmintic resistance. The important risk factors for multiple anthelmintic resistance could not be confirmed and it proved easier to criticise nematode control practices on theoretical grounds, than to propose practical solutions. It seems likely that different risk factors were involved in the four flocks. Lambs in flocks 1 and 2 had been treated with an anthelmintic at 3-4 weekly intervals with the aim of achieving suppressive nematode control, while sheep in flock 1 had been treated with an anthelmintic after they were moved onto clean grazing. Recently lambed ewes had been treated with moxidectin in three of the four flocks, with the aim of controlling their periparturient rise in faecal nematode egg output. All of these factors might have contributed to the emergence of multiple anthelmintic resistance, because they could have led to anthelmintic treatments at times when the nematode population in refugia was small, compared to that in the sheep. Annual rotation of the anthelmintic group was compromised by the emergence of benzimidazole resistance and did not prevent the emergence of multiple resistance in any of the flocks described, although the practice may have slowed the development of resistance. Underdosing may have selected for benzimidazole and imidazothiazole resistance in flock 2, associated with inaccurate estimation of the weights of terminal sire lambs. These investigations also highlighted problems associated with the diagnosis of anthelmintic resistance, in particular the confounding effects of the onset of host immunity to nematode parasites, the possible influence of the age of the adult nematode population, and the insensitivity of the undifferentiated faecal egg count reduction test in situations where resistance is emerging.     

Assessment of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep and goats owned by smallholder farmers in eastern Ethiopia

The anthelmintic resistance status was investigated of nematode parasites of sheep and goats owned by smallholder farmers in communities that received breeding stock from a source where a high level of anthelmintic resistance has been reported. The investigation used the faecal egg count reduction technique, whereby suitable animals within each of eight separate communities were pooled to achieve the numbers required to conduct separate tests for both sheep and goats. Anthelmintics tested were albendazole (ABZ), tetramisole (TET), a combination (ABZ $+$ TET) and ivermectin (IVM), at the manufacturers' recommended dose rates. Results showed that there was no evidence of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of either sheep an goats in any community. This indicates that dilution of resistant parasites imported with introduced breeding stock, and the low selection pressure imposed by the smallholder farmers themselves, has prevented anthelmintic resistance from emerging in nematode parasites of small ruminants in these communities.     

Anthelmintic resistance of nematode parasites of small ruminants in eastern Ethiopia: exploitation of refugia to restore anthelmintic efficacy

Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) were conducted in May 2003 to determine the efficacy of anthelmintics used for treatment against nematode parasites in separately managed sheep and goat flocks at Alemaya University in eastern Ethiopia. These tests revealed high levels of anthelmintic resistance to albendazole, tetramisole, the combination of these two drugs, and to ivermectin in the goat flock (predominantly infected by Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp.), whereas all drugs were highly efficacious in the sheep flock. A second FECRT confirmed these observations. Following this, a new management system was implemented on the goat flock for a period of 9 months (January-September 2004) in an attempt to restore the anthelmintic efficacy. This involved a combination of measures: eliminating the existing parasite infections in the goats, exclusion from the traditional goat pastures, and introducing communal grazing of the goats with the university sheep flock and livestock owned by neighbouring small-holder farmers. A second series of FECRTs (Tests 3 and 4) conducted 7 months after this change in management, showed high levels of efficacy to all three drugs (albendazole, tetramisole and ivermectin) in the goat flock. This is the first field study to demonstrate that anthelmintic efficacy in the control of nematode parasites of small ruminants can be restored by exploiting refugia.     

Farm management practices associated with macrocyclic lactone resistance on sheep farms in New Zealand

AIM: To identify farm practices associated with the presence of resistance to a macrocyclic lactone (ML) anthelmintic on sheep farms in New Zealand. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted to test for associations between the presence of resistance to an ML anthelmintic (ivermectin) and management practices on sheep farms in New Zealand. Selection of farms was both random (n=80) and purposive (n=32; being farms with a history of suspected ML resistance). Resistance was inferred from faecal nematode egg count (FEC) reduction (FECR) tests (FECRTs) when there was <95% reduction in FEC 7-10 days after treatment with a half dose of ivermectin (0.1 mg/kg). A logistic regression model was built to identify farm-level factors that were associated with the presence or absence of ML resistance. RESULTS: Of the 112 flock managers that were approached for interview, 103 (92%) returned useable questionnaires. The odds of ML resistance were increased: on farms that had used long-acting ML products in ewes as a pre-lambing treatment for > or =3 of the previous 5 years (odds ratio (OR) = 7.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-30.3); on farms where <70% of the total stock units mid-winter were from sheep (OR=6.5; 95% CI=1.6-25.6); on farms which over the year purchased >10% of the number of sheep present mid-winter (OR=7.1; 95% CI=1.5-34.7); and on farms where the average wool diameter of the main flock was <37 (OR=4.1; 95% CI=1.1-14.7) microns. The model provided a good fit to the data (pseudo R2=0.64; Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Explanatory factors identified as associated with the presence of ML (ivermectin) resistance on farms included the use of long-acting anthelmintic formulations in ewes pre-lambing, sources of refugia of unselected parasites on the farm, breed of sheep and their requirements for anthelmintic treatments, and the importing of resistant parasites with purchased stock. The study provides support for controls that aim to provide refugia of susceptible worms and that minimise the risk of introduction of resistance through effective quarantine drenching.     

A multi-species model to assess the effect of refugia on worm control and anthelmintic resistance in sheep grazing systems

Objective Develop a computer simulation model that uses daily meteorological data and farm management practices to predict populations of Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Haemonchus contortus and Teladorsagia (Ostertagia) circumcincta and the evolution of anthelmintic resistance within a sheep flock. Use the model to explore if increased refugia, provided by leaving some adult sheep untreated, would delay development of anthelmintic resistance without compromising nematode control. Procedures Compare model predictions with field observations from a breeding flock in Armidale, NSW. Simulate the impact of leaving 1–10% of adult sheep untreated in diverse sheep‐grazing systems. Results Predicted populations of Tr. colubriformis and T. circumcincta were less than those observed in the field, attributed to nutritional stress experienced by the sheep during drought and not accounted for by the model. Observed variation in faecal egg counts explained by the model (R²) for these species was 40–50%. The H. contortus populations and R² were both low. Leaving some sheep untreated worked best in situations where animals were already grazing or were moved onto pastures with low populations of infective larvae. In those cases, anthelmintic resistance was delayed and nematode control was maintained when 1–4% of adult stock remained untreated. Conclusions In general, the model predicted that leaving more than 4% of adults untreated did not sufficiently delay the development of anthelmintic resistance to justify the increased production risk from such a strategy. The choice of a drug rotation strategy had an equal or larger effect on nematode control, and selection for resistance, than leaving 1–10% of adults untreated.     

Use of anthelmintics by New England sheep producers

Six hundred and sixty-five New England sheep producers responded to a postal survey on management practices, anthelmintic use, and the perceived failure of anthelmintics to control nematodes. Although the average farm had 34.8 lambs and 29.8 stock sheep, 59.8% and 50.3% of the total number of lambs and stock sheep were on 16.5% of the farms, which had greater than 50 lambs. About 54% of the lambs were born in January and February. Spring markets and confinement rearing were popular, as only 45.7% of the total lambs grazed summer pasture. Most producers (81.5%) treated their stock sheep (and lambs) for nematodiasis 2 to 4 times per year (mean, 3.3), generally before lambing, before pasturing, midsummer, and/or before breeding. Only 27.5% of the producers indicated distinct drenching management for grazing lambs. There was little use of preventive control, such as spring prophylaxis (0.5%) or dosing in midsummer and moving animals to safe pasture (2.9%). More than one anthelmintic class was used on 59.6% of the farms, with a mean of 1.88 anthelmintics per farm. Though 53.7% of the producers had a policy of alternating anthelmintic classes within a year, only 11.6% alternated anthelmintics annually. Levamisole and thiabendazole were the anthelmintics most frequently used by 81.8% and 61.6% of producers, respectively. However, 26.5% and 16.2% of the farms used fenbendazole and phenothiazine, respectively. The presence of gastrointestinal nematode resistance to anthelmintics was suggested, because 35.4% of the producers had discontinued using at least one anthelmintic that they considered to be ineffective. The anthelmintic that was most frequently discontinued was thiabendazole.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Refugia--overlooked as perhaps the most potent factor concerning the development of anthelmintic resistance

Anthelmintic resistance involving particularly the gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants is escalating globally, to the extent that in certain countries, such as South Africa, it has already reached alarming proportions, and is affecting practically all the anthelmintics. In this paper it is argued that the high levels of resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance indicate that the drugs have been used incorrectly. It is suggested that the phenomenon of refugia plays a much more important role in the selection of anthelmintic resistance than other phenomena that are more frequently investigated and recommended for counteracting it, such as reduced drenching frequency and avoiding under-dosing. While refugia is commonly mentioned in passing in most papers on anthelmintic resistance, it is, almost without exception, not incorporated in the final control/ management proposals. On the strength of the conclusions arrived at in the present paper strategies such as the drench-and-move system in which all the animals in a flock are drenched before they are moved to pastures containing few or no worms in refugia, and the system of strategic drenching on safe pastures should be condemned and never recommended. If such strategies are indeed unavoidable, the farmer should be warned that the farming system would probably not be sustainable even in the short term, in view of the generally high levels of resistance already present in most of the important sheep-producing regions. Farmers should be educated to consider refugia above all else when designing worm management programmes. Finally there seems to be too much complacency concerning the possibility that anthelmintic resistance may also escalate in cattle, eventually to reach the proportions that it has in sheep.     

A survey of nematode control measures used by milking goat farmers and of anthelmintic resistance on their farms

Forty-seven milking goat herds, located throughout New Zealand, were surveyed for anthelmintic usage and for gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to anthelmintics. Most farmers (62%) followed a predetermined drenching programme and usually (68%) had a policy of alternating between drench families. Alternation was generally within the farming year. Kids were on average being drenched 12.5 times during their first year (range 2-34). Does aged greater than one year were all being drenched at the same frequency (average 13.4, range 2-34) irrespective of age. On each of the 47 farms, a group of goats was treated with a benzimidazole (BZ) drench (oxfendazole, OFZ, at 4.5 mg/kg on 36 farms and thiabendazole, TBZ at 66 mg/kg on 11 farms); a second group was treated with a "cell membrane depolarizing" (CMD) drench (levamisole, LEV, at 8 mg/kg on 35 farms and morantel citrate, MOR, at 10 mg/kg on 12 farms); a third group remained untreated as controls. Faecal egg counts and larval cultures were done before dosing and one week later. Faecal egg count depressions of <80% were taken as being suggestive of anthelmintic resistance. On this basis resistance was found on 79% of farms surveyed. Resistance to BZs alone occurred on 36% of farms, resistance to CMDs alone on 4% and resistance to both on 38% of farms. On 23% of farms one or other of the drenches was without any apparent effect and on one farm both of the drenches tested failed to reduce the egg counts. Post-drenching larval cultures showed Trichostrongylus, Haemonchus and Ostertagia to be the most prevalent genera remaining after drenching with BZ on 14,11, and 8 farms, respectively. After drenching with LEV Ostertagia was the dominant species on 10 farms, Trichostrongylus on 2 and on one farm the two genera were equally common. Following treatment with MOR Trichostrongylus was the dominant species on 3 farms, Haemonchus on 2 and on one farm Trichostrongylus and Ostertagia were equally common. There was a positive association between drenching frequency and the presence of resistance on farms. Possible interpretations of this association are discussed.     

Sheep-farm risk factors for ivermectin resistance in Ostertagia circumcincta in Western Australia

On-farm risk factors associated with ivermectin resistance on sheep farms in Western Australia were identified from data derived from a postal survey of 235 farmers who had conducted a fecal egg-count-reduction test in 1999, 2000, or both years. A response of 54% was achieved. We developed a logistic-regression model. Contributory main effects in the final model were selling 10% more sheep in 2000 than is the usual policy (OR=4.00), farm purchased since 1975 (OR=2.34), and number of winter flock anthelmintic treatments in the previous 5 years (OR=1.04). A secondary logistic-regression model assessed risk factors for farms selling 10% more sheep than usual in 2000; these farmers appeared less committed to their sheep enterprises than other farmers. These results are discussed in relation to current hypotheses of anthelmintic resistance. This is the first time that the farmer’s management of the flock has been implicated in the development of anthelmintic resistance.     

A computer model to simulate control of parasitic gastroenteritis in sheep on UK farms

A computer model that simulates the population dynamics and epidemiology of three major species of parasitic nematodes of sheep found in the UK (Telodorsagia [Ostertagia] spp., Haemonchus spp. and Trichostrongylus spp.) is described. The model has been developed as a tool for veterinarians and advisors to aid in the implementation of integrated parasite control strategies designed to optimise anthelmintic usage and delay the development of resistance on UK farms. The model represents the parasite life cycle, flock dynamics and the response of individuals with different susceptible and resistant genotypes to the major broad-spectrum classes of anthelmintic available in the UK. Where possible, UK data have been used for the model parameters. The model allows worm control simulations on individual UK farms. Inputs include environmental and farm management variables which impact on the epidemiology of the disease, e.g. regional weather data; flock stocking rates; initial pasture larval contamination levels and species proportions; lambing dates; timing of flock movements to clean pastures; and removal of lambs during the year. Farm management data, as well as nematode egg outputs and grass larval counts, were collected from eight UK farms over a 1-year period for initial validation of the model outputs. The management data for each farm were used as inputs for each model run and model outputs for nematode egg counts from ewes and lambs were compared to the observed data for each farm. Statistical analysis of results shows a positive correlation for observed and simulated counts and regression analysis suggests an acceptable fit between the data. Comparison of observed and simulated outputs for resistance were possible for only one farm due to low numbers of worms developing in the laboratory tests. Additional studies will be necessary before resistance data can be reliably compared. Further validation studies are proposed to ensure that the model is robust and applicable across a diverse range of farm types. The model will be used to demonstrate the advantage, in terms of delaying resistance development, of current guidelines for anthelmintic use and management practices for worm control in sheep.     

Worm control practice against gastro-intestinal parasites in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks

Background

Anthelmintic treatment is the most common way of controlling nematode infections in ruminants. However, several countries have reported anthelmintic resistance (AR), representing a limitation for sustainable small ruminant production. The knowledge regarding worm control management represents a baseline to develop a guideline for preventing AR. The aim of the present study was therefore to improve our knowledge about the worm control practices in small ruminant flocks in Norway.

Methods

A questionnaire survey regarding worm control practices was performed in small ruminant flocks in Norway. Flocks were selected from the three main areas of small ruminant farming, i.e. the coastal, inland and northern areas. A total of 825 questionnaires, comprising 587 sheep flocks (return rate of 51.3%) and 238 goat flocks (52.6%) were included.

Results

The results indicated that visual appraisal of individual weight was the most common means of estimating the anthelmintic dose used in sheep (78.6%) and goat (85.1%) flocks. The mean yearly drenching rate in lambs and ewes were 2.5 ± 1.7 and 1.9 ± 1.1, respectively, whereas it was 1.0 (once a year) in goats. However, these figures were higher in sheep in the coastal area with a rate of 3.4 and 2.2 in lambs and ewes, respectively. Benzimidazoles were the predominant anthelmintic class used in sheep flocks (64.9% in 2007), whereas benzimidazoles and macrocyclic lactones were both equally used in dairy goat flocks. In the period of 2005-2007, 46.3% of the sheep flocks never changed the anthelmintic class. The dose and move strategy was practiced in 33.2% of the sheep flocks.

Conclusions

The present study showed that inaccurate weight calculation gives a risk of under-dosing in over 90% of the sheep and goat flocks in Norway. Taken together with a high treatment frequency in lambs, a lack of anthelmintic class rotation and the common use of a dose-and-move strategy, a real danger for development of anthelmintic resistance (AR) seems to exist in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks. This risk seems particularly high in coastal areas where high treatment frequencies in lambs were recorded.     

The comparative efficacy of abamectin, monepantel and an abamectin/derquantel combination against fourth-stage larvae of a macrocyclic lactone-resistant Teladorsagia spp. isolate infecting sheep

Anthelmintic resistance by gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep continues to be an issue of global interest. While the recent introduction in some countries of one or two new anthelmintic classes (amino-acetonitrile derivatives [AAD] and spiroindoles [SI]) has been welcomed, it is important that there is no relaxation in parasite control and the management of drug resistance. Monepantel (an AAD) was the first new anthelmintic to be approved for use (New Zealand, 2009) and was followed a year later in the same country by a combination of derquantel (a SI) and abamectin. The present study determined the efficacy of the new anthelmintic products and abamectin against fourth-stage larvae of macrocyclic lactone-resistant Teladorsagia spp. in lambs. Efficacies were calculated by comparing post-mortem nematode burdens of treated animals with those of untreated control sheep, and were 98.5, 86.3 and 34.0% for monepantel, abamectin/derquantel and abamectin, respectively. The nematode burdens of monepantel- and abamectin/derquantel-treated sheep were significantly lower than those sheep treated with abamectin and the untreated controls. Similarly, the burden of the monepantel group was significantly lower than that of the abamectin/derquantel group. These findings provide an opportunity to reinforce the recommendation that farmers and animal health advisors need to know the resistance status of nematode populations on subject farms to ensure effective control programs are designed and implemented. Such control programs should include an appropriate choice of anthelmintic(s), monitoring parasite burdens for correct timing of treatments, and pasture management to reduce larval challenge balanced with the maintenance of drug-susceptible populations in refugia.     

Parasitic helminths of veterinary importance in cattle,sheep and goats on communal farms in the northeastern Free State,South Africa

The purpose of the study was to record and determine intensities, seasonal incidence and distribution of helminth parasites of veterinary importance that occur in cattle, sheep and goats in the northeastern Free State. The study was conducted at Harrismith and Kestell and in Qwa-Qwa from March 2000 to May 2001. Cattle of various breeds (including Bonsmara, Simmentaler and Friesian), Merino sheep and Angora goats were sampled. Faecal samples were analysed using the McMaster and Visser sieve techniques for egg counts and faecal cultures for 3rd-stage nematode larvae identification. Haemonchus and Oesophagostomum were the dominant nematode genera found to be infecting the animals. The socioeconomic status of the farmers in the study area was determined through a questionnaire survey aimed at recording their management strategies. It indicated that 81% of farmers take care of their livestock by feeding them with supplements. The low to moderate faecal egg counts from cattle showed that helminth infections in this region are still under control even though helminthosis seems to be a problem in small-stock, since EPG counts of more than > 1000 were found. Cattle farmers in this region are encouraged to continue with good animal husbandry practices that have ensured that helminth infections rates are kept low. Small-stock farmers are, however, encouraged to control helminth infections in their sheep and goats by anthelmintic treatment.     

Multigeneric resistance to benzimidazole anthelmintics in sheep

Benzimidazole resistance involving several gastrointestinal nematode genera on a single sheep farm in New Zealand is reported for the first time. A controlled slaughter trial showed that at the recommended dose rate of 12.5 mg/kg, mebendazole had efficacies of 0, 60, 66, 90, 54 and 38% against Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia spp., Nematodirus spp., intestinal Trichostrongylus spp., Strongyloides spp. and Oesophagostomum venulosum, respectively. The relevance of such multigeneric resistance to possible future options for controlling anthelmintic resistant sheep trichostrongylids is briefly discussed.     

Resistance to a triple combination of broad-spectrum anthelmintics in naturally-acquired Ostertagia circumcincta infections in sheep

AIM: To measure the efficacy of two macrocyclic lactone-levamisole-benzimidazole combination drenches against naturally-acquired abomasal nematode infections on a sheep farm in the North Island, New Zealand. METHODS: Eighteen lambs carrying naturally-acquired worm burdens were removed from pasture and randomly allocated to one of three equal-sized groups, consisting of an untreated control group and two treatment groups. One treatment group was given a single oral dose of a triple-combination anthelmintic administered at the manufacturer's recommended dose rate of 0.2 mg/kg ivermectin, 7.5 mg/kg levamisole and 5.0 mg/kg albendazole. The other treatment group received a similar dose of another triple-combination drench consisting of 0.2 mg/kg abamectin, 8.0 mg/kg levamisole and 4.5 mg/kg oxfendazole. Worm counts were carried out post mortem on the abomasa of all animals in all groups, 10 days after treatment. RESULTS: While the abamectin-levamisole-oxfendazole combination was highly effective against all three abomasal nematode species present, the ivermectin-levamisole-albendazole combination was not. In the latter instance, a reduction of only 78% was achieved against infections of Ostertagia (=Teladorsagia) circumcincta. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence of resistance to an ivermectin-levamisole-albendazole combination drench by O. circumcincta. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Besides representing the first confirmed report of resistance to a combination drench consisting of three broad-spectrum anthelmintics, the present results provide further evidence of the continuing escalation of multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep nematodes in New Zealand.