首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

成都平原不同耕作模式的农田效应研究 I.对土壤性状及作物产量的影响
引用本文:梁淑敏,谢瑞芝,汤永禄,杨锦忠,李朝苏,王灵便,吴春,李少昆.成都平原不同耕作模式的农田效应研究 I.对土壤性状及作物产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(19):3988-3996.
作者姓名:梁淑敏  谢瑞芝  汤永禄  杨锦忠  李朝苏  王灵便  吴春  李少昆
作者单位:(山西农业大学农学院)
基金项目:*,国家"973"项目,现代农业产业技术体系 
摘    要: 【目的】通过研究不同耕作模式对土壤性状及产量的影响,为成都平原主导耕作模式的筛选和调控技术提供理论依据。【方法】采用长期定位试验的方法,通过5年对5个处理CK:麦稻双旋(WRCT)、麦免+稻旋 (WNRCT)、麦稻双免(WRNT)、麦稻垄作(WRRT)、麦免+稻旋+秋作(WNRCVNT)]的大田试验研究,系统分析耕作模式对土壤性状和作物产量的影响。【结果】不同耕作模式对土壤性状的影响各不相同:与对照相比,单免和双免耕处理降低了0-10 cm土层的容重,增加了10-20 cm土层的土壤容重;增加了土壤的小孔隙、小孔隙的比例及0-10 cm土层的大孔隙,降低了10-20 cm的大孔隙,使土壤孔径分布得到改善。耕作措施对土壤吸湿水和土壤比重影响差异不显著,免耕降低了土壤比重。双免使土壤的渗水速率增加,不利于水稻生长,但单免能促进水稻生长。与对照相比,单免和双免耕秸秆覆盖增加了土壤有机质,降低了0-10 cm土层的碱性,但增加了10-20 cm土层的碱性。双免耕定位5年,增加了小麦产量,但大幅降低了水稻的产量。与此相反,单免则有利于小麦和水稻共同增产。【结论】免耕形成了“上松下紧”的土壤结构,改变了土壤的通透性,尤其是在10-20 cm,打破了传统耕作的犁底层。但免耕对土壤结构的改变对小麦和水稻的产量影响并不一致:长期双免耕能促进小麦增产,但对水稻生长和产量不利。

关 键 词:成都平原  耕作模式  土壤性状  作物产量
收稿时间:2010-06-27;

Effects of Tillage Systems on Fields in Chengdu Plain Ⅰ.The Effects of Tillage Systems on Soil Properties and Crop Yields
LIANG Shu-min,XIE Rui-zhi,TANG Yong-lu,YANG Jin-zhong,LI Chao-su,WANG Ling-bian,WU Chun,LI Shao-kun.Effects of Tillage Systems on Fields in Chengdu Plain Ⅰ.The Effects of Tillage Systems on Soil Properties and Crop Yields[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2010,43(19):3988-3996.
Authors:LIANG Shu-min  XIE Rui-zhi  TANG Yong-lu  YANG Jin-zhong  LI Chao-su  WANG Ling-bian  WU Chun  LI Shao-kun
Affiliation:(Agronomy College, Shanxi Agriculture University)
Abstract:【Objective】 In order to provide a theoretical basis for the main tillage systems and control technology of Chengdu plain, the effects of different tillages on soil properties and yield were compared. 【Method】 Based on long-term experiments, 5 years of field trials were carried and the tillages on crop yield and soil properties and their relationship were analysed. The five treatments were wheat and rice conventional tillage (WRCT); wheat no-tillage and rice conventional tillage (WNRCT); wheat and rice no-tillage (WRNT); wheat and rice ridge tillage (WRRT); wheat no-tillage and rice conventional tillage and autumn vegetable no-tillage (WNRCVNT).【Result】 The effects of different tillage systems on soil properties were different: Compared with the control, single and double no-tillage all reduced soil bulk density of the 0-10 cm layer, increased that of the 10-20 cm layer; which increased the small soil porosity, and increased the big soil porosity of the 0-10 cm layer, while increased the proportion of small pores, decreased the big soil porosity of the 10-20 cm layer, which improved the soil pore size distribution. It was not significantly different in soil specific gravity and soil hygroscopic water between tillage treatments. No-tillage decreased the soil specific gravity. The seepage rate of soil was increased too, which was not good for rice growth. No-tillage increased the soil organic. No-tillage straw mulching reduced alkalescence of the 0-10 cm soil layer, but increased alkalescence of the 10-20 cm soil layer. The average yield of five years showed that no-tillage increased wheat production, but significantly reduced rice production. 【Conclusion】 No-tillage resulted in the formation of “loose above and compact below” soil structure, which changed the soil permeability. Especially in the 10-20 cm, it broke the traditional plowpan. But no-tillage changed the soil structure which the effects on wheat and rice yield is not consistent. Under the same conditions, no-tillage is beneficial to increase wheat yield, but it is negative to rice growth and yield. The reason mainly due to no-tillage increased the rates of soil water seepage, and it caused leakage of water and nutrients seriously.
Keywords:Chengdu Plain  tillage systems  soil properties  crop yield
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号