| 高山松地上生物量遥感估算的不确定性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄屹杰,张加龙,胡耀鹏,程滔.高山松地上生物量遥感估算的不确定性分析[J].浙江农林大学学报,2022,39(3):531-539. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄屹杰 张加龙 胡耀鹏 程滔 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.西南林业大学 林学院，云南 昆明 6502332.国家基础地理信息中心 调查监测部，北京 100830 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31860207)；2020年云南省高层次人才培养支持计划“青年拔尖人才”专项(81210468)；西南林业大学科研启动基金(111932) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 采用遥感数据估算森林地上生物量仍存在一些不确定性问题，研究估算过程中的误差来源及其占比，对提高森林地上生物量的估测精度具有重要意义。 方法 从遥感影像提取因子，结合高山松Pinus densata外业调查数据，建立多元线性回归、梯度提升回归树、随机森林等3种地上生物量估测模型，对样地尺度与3种模型的不确定性进行分析和度量。 结果 ①高山松单株生物量模型不确定性为16.43%，样地尺度的不确定性为7.07%；②多元线性回归模型残差不确定性为34.86%，参数不确定性为21.30%，与样地不确定性合成后总不确定性为41.45%；③非参数模型中，梯度提升回归树估测高山松地上生物量的总不确定性为23.12%，随机森林为19.42%。 结论 3种遥感估算模型中，非参数模型的不确定性明显低于参数模型。相较于样地尺度，遥感估算模型的不确定性对地上生物量估算精度的影响较大。图3表3参26
|
| 关 键 词： | 高山松 地上生物量 遥感估测模型 不确定性 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-07-08 |
Uncertainty analysis of estimating aboveground biomass of Pinus densata by remote sensing |
| |
| HUANG Yijie,ZHANG Jialong,HU Yaopeng,CHENG Tao.Uncertainty analysis of estimating aboveground biomass of Pinus densata by remote sensing[J].Journal of Zhejiang A&F University,2022,39(3):531-539. |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Yijie ZHANG Jialong HU Yaopeng CHENG Tao |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650233, Yunnan, China2.Department of Investigation and Monitoring, National Geomatics Center of China, Beijing 100830, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To improve the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass, this study is aimed to conduct an uncertainty analysis, trying to figure out the percentage error of estimating forest aboveground biomass by remote sensing and the causes behind. Method With factors extracted from remote sensing images and combined with the data of Pinus densata from field surveys, three types of aboveground biomass estimation model were established, namely Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Gradient Boost Regression Tree (GBRT), and Random Forest (RF), before the uncertainty of sample plot scale and three models was measured and analyzed. Result (1) The uncertainty of tree biomass model for P. densata is 16.43%, and the uncertainty of the scale up to the sample plot is 7.07%; (2) The residual uncertainty of the MLR model is 34.86%, the parameter uncertainty is 21.30% whereas the total uncertainty combined with the sample plot uncertainty is 41.45%. (3) In the non-parametric model of the GBRT modeling estimates, the total uncertainty of the aboveground biomass is 23.12%, and the RF is 19.42%. Conclusion Among the three remote sensing models, the uncertainty of the non-parametric model is obviously lower than that of the parametric model. Compared with the uncertainty of the sample plot scale, the remote sensing estimation model has a great effect on the accuracy of the aboveground biomass estimation. Ch, 3 fig. 3 tab. 26 ref.] |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《浙江农林大学学报》下载全文 |
|
