首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤温度、根际微生物及酶活性的影响
引用本文:杨滨娟,黄国勤,钱海燕.秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤温度、根际微生物及酶活性的影响[J].土壤学报,2014,51(1):150-157.
作者姓名:杨滨娟  黄国勤  钱海燕
作者单位:江西农业大学生态科学研究中心,江西农业大学生态科学研究中心,中国科学院南京土壤研究所
基金项目:江西省研究生创新专项资助项目(YC2012-B016)、国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAD14B14-01)和江西省科技支撑计划项目(2009BNA09300)共同资助
摘    要:以单施秸秆为对照,研究秸秆还田配施不同比例化肥对土壤温度、土壤根际微生物和酶活性的影响。结果表明:(1)在水稻不同生育期,与对照相比秸秆还田配施化肥各处理在8:00和20:00均提高了土壤温度,而在14:00降低了土壤温度。从地温日较差分析可知,秸秆还田配施化肥处理的整日地温变化幅度低于对照,且差异显著。此外随着土层深度的增加,秸秆还田配施化肥处理与对照间的差距逐渐减少,调温作用逐渐减弱。(2)秸秆还田配施化肥各处理能够增加根际土壤总细菌、放线菌、真菌、氨氧化细菌、好气性自生固氮菌、亚硝酸细菌、磷细菌和好气性纤维素分解菌的数量,但普遍区组间差异不显著。除了秸秆还田配施低量NP处理(SNP1,秸秆3 000 kg hm-2+N 150 kg hm-2+P2O575 kg hm-2)以外,秸秆还田配施化肥各处理的过氧化氢酶、脲酶、转化酶活性均高于对照,但区组间均未达到显著差异。因此,秸秆还田配施化肥能合理调节土壤温度,显著提高土壤微生物的数量与活性,有利于土壤生态环境的改善,其中秸秆还田配施NPK处理(SNPK1,秸秆3 000 kg hm-2+N 150 kg hm-2+P2O575 kg hm-2+K2O 37.5 kg hm-2;SNPK2,秸秆3 000 kg hm-2+N 225 kg hm-2+P2O5112.5 kg hm-2+K2O 56.3 kg hm-2)效果最为显著。

关 键 词:秸秆还田  不同比例化肥  土壤温度  根际  微生物  酶活性
收稿时间:2013/1/17 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/9/23 0:00:00

Effects of straw incorporation plus chemical fertilizer on soil temperature, root micro-organisms and enzyme activities
Yang Binjuan,Huang Guoqin and Qian Haiyan.Effects of straw incorporation plus chemical fertilizer on soil temperature, root micro-organisms and enzyme activities[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2014,51(1):150-157.
Authors:Yang Binjuan  Huang Guoqin and Qian Haiyan
Affiliation:Research Center on Ecological Science,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Research Center on Ecological Science,Jiangxi Agricultural University,Nanjing Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Soil
Abstract:In order to explore effects of straw incorporation plus application of chemical fertilizer varying in NPK ratio on soil temperature and moisture conservation and soil-root biological properties, a field experiment was conducted. Results show that the treatments of straw incorporation plus application of chemical fertilizer varying in ratio raised soil temperature at 8:00 and 20:00 and lowered at 14:00 in all the growing periods, compared with the control. Analysis of soil temperature shows that the range of its daily variation was narrower in the treatments than in the control and the difference was significant. However, the difference was getting less significant with the increasing soil depth, which means that the soil temperature regulating effect of the treatments was declining gradually. Besides, the treatments significantly increased the populations of bacteria, actinomyces, fungi, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, aerobic authigenic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, nitrite bacteria, phosphorus bacteria and aerobic cellulose decomposing bacteria, but generally the difference between the treatments in the effect was not significant. All the treatments, except Treatment SNP1 (3 000 kg hm-2 crushed straw 150 kg hm-2N 75 kg hm-2 P2O5), were higher than the control in activity of catalase, urease and invertase, but the differences were not very significant. The findings demonstrate that straw incorporation plus application of chemical fertilizer, though varying in ratio, may reasonably regulate, increase the population and activity of soil microbes and help improve the soil eco-environment. Among the treatments, Treatment SNPK1 (3 000 kg hm-2 straw 150 kg hm-2 N 75 kg hm-2 P2O5 37.5 kg hm-2 K2O) and Treatment SNPK2 (3 000 kg hm-2 straw 225 kg hm-2N 112.5kg hm-2 P2O5 56.3 kg hm-2K2O) are the most significant in this effect.
Keywords:Straw incorporation  Different ratio of fertilizer  Soil temperature  Rhizosphere  Microbes  Enzyme activity
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号