Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks |
| |
| Authors: | L Lebert S‐L Martz N Janecko A E Deckert A Agunos A Reid J E Rubin R J Reid‐Smith S A McEwen |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada;2. Centre for Foodborne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, Canada;3. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Canada;4. Department of Veterinary Microbiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada |
| |
| Abstract: | Surveillance is an important component of an overall strategy to address antimicrobial resistant bacteria in food animals and the food chain. The poultry market has many points of entry into the Canadian food chain, and some production practices are underrepresented in terms of surveillance. For example, pathogen carriage and antimicrobial resistance surveillance data are limited in smallholder chicken flocks raised for slaughter at provincially inspected abattoirs. In Canada, antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from commercial broiler chicken flocks, slaughtered at federally inspected abattoirs, is monitored by the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS ). The objective of this study was to establish baseline information of antimicrobial resistance presence in E. coli and Salmonella isolated from smallholder flocks in Ontario, utilizing CIPARS collection and isolation methodologies, and to compare findings with CIPARS federally inspected abattoir data from Ontario, Canada. Five chickens per flock were sampled from 205 smallholder flocks. Of 1,025 samples, the E. coli prevalence was 99% (1,022/1,025), and 47% (483/1,022) of positive E. coli isolates were resistant to one or more of the 14 antimicrobials. Furthermore, as compared to results reported for the CIPARS commercial flocks, E. coli isolates from smallholder flocks had significantly lower resistance prevalence to six of 14 individual antimicrobials. Recovery of E. coli did not differ between federally inspected and provincially inspected flocks. Salmonella prevalence at the bird level in smallholder flocks was 0.3% (3/1,025), significantly lower (p ? 0.0001, 95% CI 0.080%–0.86%) than federally inspected commercial flocks. The overall differences found between the commercial and smallholder flocks may be explained by differences in poultry husbandry practices and hatchery sources. |
| |
| Keywords: | β ‐lactam abattoir Canadian Integrated System for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance chickens smallholder flocks surveillance |
|
|
