Measurement and convergence of agriculture total factor productivity in Fujian based on Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen indicator
-
摘要: 【目的】测算福建省农业全要素生产率(Total factor productivity,TFP)并判断其变动趋势,为促进区域协调发展及实现农业高质量发展提供科学决策。【方法】利用Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen(LHM)指标具备加性完备条件,基于自由处置壳(Free disposal hull,FDH)模型构造LHM TFP指标,将县域划分为一般县(市)、贫困县和发达市(区),测度2003—2018年福建省全省及县域的农业TFP,并分解为技术效率变化、规模效率变化和技术进步,分析其收敛性特征。【结果】2003—2018年福建省农业TFP整体上呈增长趋势,2018年达0.840,年均增长率为5.731%;技术效率变化、规模效率变化和技术进步年均增长率分别为-1.231%、2.032%和4.930%,表明技术进步是TFP增长的主要驱动力,技术效率变化拉低TFP增长。从福建省一般县(市)、贫困县、发达市(区)的划分来看,各区域农业TFP及其分解指标与全省层面表现基本一致。福建省全省及一般县(市)、贫困县农业TFP存在σ收敛、绝对β收敛及条件β收敛,发达市(区)农业TFP不存在收敛趋势。TFP低的县(市)有追赶效应,城镇化、工业化对福建省全省及一般县(市)农业TFP收敛过程有促进作用,但工业化对贫困县农业TFP收敛具有抑制作用。【建议】积极发展适度规模经营,加快先进生产要素向农业园区集聚,提升农业科技创新能力;各县域应因地制宜,发达市(区)发挥技术引领与辐射作用,一般县(市)着重提升技术效率级规模效率,贫困县则要优化要素资源配置;加快形成功能互补的发展格局,推动先进生产要素向农业优势,实现农业劳均产出均衡发展。。
-
关键词:
- Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen(LHM)指标 /
- FDH模型 /
- 农业全要素生产率 /
- 收敛分析 /
- 福建省
Abstract: 【Objective】In order to provide a scientific decision-making reference for achieving high-quality agricultural development, agricultural total factor productivity(TFP) was accurately measuredand its evolutionary trend and convergence characteristics in Fujian were discussed.【Method】Using the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen(LHM) indicator with additive completeness conditions, the LHM TFP indicator was constructed based on the free disposal shell(FDH) model.From the perspective of the county level, including general counties(cities), poor counties and developed cities(districts), the agricultural TFP in counties of Fujian from 2003 to 2018 was measured, and decomposed into technological efficiency changes(TEC) scale efficiency changes(SEC) and technological progress(TP), and then its convergence characteristics were analyzed.【Result】During 2003-2018, the agricultural TFP showed growing trend in Fujian, which reached 0.840 in 2018 with an average annual increase rate of 5.731%.The average annual growth rates of TEC, SEC, and TP were -1.231%, 2.032% and 4.930%, respectively, indicating that technological progress was the main driving force for TFP growth, but changes in technical efficiency was the main limiting factor.The agricultural TFP of general counties(cities), poor counties and developed cities(districts) in Fujian and its decomposition indicators were more consistent with the performance of the provincial level.There were σ convergence, absolute β convergence and conditional β convergence of agricultural TFP in Fujian and its general counties(cities) and poorcounties, while not in developed ones.A catch-up effect was observed in low total factor productivity counties(cities).Urbanization and industrialization could promote agricultural TFP convergence process in Fujian and the general counties(cities), but industrialization constrained TFP convergence process in the poor counties.【Suggestion】First, it is necessary to actively develop moderate-scale management body, to accelerate the gathering of advanced production factors in agricultural parks, and to enhance the innovation ability of agricultural science and technology.Second, with adaptation to local conditions, the developed cities(districts) must play a role in technology leadership and radiation, general counties(cities) focusing on improving TEC and SEC, and poor counties optimizing the allocation of factor resources.Finally, it is necessary to accelerate the formation of a functionally complementary development pattern, to promote advanced production factors to agricultural advantages, and to achieve balanced development of agricultural labor output. -
江激宇, 徐腾.2019.安徽粮食全要素生产率时空演变及收敛性分析[J].新疆农垦经济, (6):62-69.[Jiang J Y, Xu T.2019.Spatio-temporal evolution and convergence analysis on total factor productivity of grain in Anhui Province[J].Xinjiang State Farms Economy, (6):62-69.] 李欠男, 李谷成, 高雪, 尹朝静.2019.农业全要素生产率增长的地区差距及空间收敛性分析[J].中国农业资源与区划, 40(7):28-36.[Li Q N, Li G C, Gao X, Yin C J.2009.Analysis of regional gap and spatial convergence of agricultural total factor productivity growth[J].Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 40(7):28-36.] 李汝资, 吕芸芸, 王文刚, 刘耀彬.2019.中国城市用地扩张对农业全要素生产率的影响研究——基于土地财政的门槛效应视角[J].华东经济管理, 33(8):76-82.[Li R Z, Lü Y Y, Wang W G, Liu Y B.2019.The impact of urban land expansion on agricultural TFP in China-Based on threshold effect of land finance[J].East China Economic Management, 33(8):76-82.] 李文华.2018.基于DEA-Malmquist指数的中国农业全要素生产率时空差异及影响因素分析[J].山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 20(2):96-103.[Li W H.2018.Total factor productivity of China's agriculture based on DEAMalmquist index analysis of time and space difference and influencing factors[J].Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 20(2):96-103.] 刘德娟, 曾玉荣.2018.环境约束下福建省农业全要素生产率研究[J].福建农业学报, 33(9):994-1002.[Liu D J, Zeng Y R.2018.Agricultural total factor productivity of Fujian under environmental constraints[J].Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(9):994-1002.] 刘晗, 王钊, 姜松.2015.基于随机前沿生产函数的农业全要素生产率增长研究[J].经济问题探索, (11):35-42.[Liu H, Wang Z, Jiang S.2015.Research on agricultural total factor productivity growth based on stochastic frontier production function[J].Inquiry into Economic Issues, (11):35-42.] 刘战伟.2018.中国农业全要素生产率的动态演进及其影响因素分析[J].中国农业资源与区划, 39(12):104-111.[Liu Z W.2018.Analysis on the dynamic evolution and influencing factors of agricultural total factor productivity in China[J].Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 39(12):104-111.] 史常亮, 朱俊峰, 揭昌亮.2016.中国农业全要素生产率增长地区差异及收敛性分析——基于固定效应SFA模型和面板单位根方法[J].经济问题探索, (4):134-141.[Shi C L, Zhu J F, Jie C L.2016.Analysis of regional difference and convergence of China's agricultural total factor productivity growth-Based on fixed effect SFA model and panel unit root[J].Inquiry into Economic Issues, (4):134-141.] 王军, 杨秀云.2019.改革开放以来中国农业全要素生产率的动态演进及收敛性分析[J].统计与信息论坛, 34(11):59-66.[Wang J, Yang X Y.2019.The dynamic evolution and convergence analysis of agricultural total factor productivity in China since the Reform and Opening[J].Statistics & Information Forum, 34(11):59-66.] 尹朝静.2020.城镇化、工业化对农业全要素生产率增长的影响研究——来自重庆37个县(区) 面板数据的证据[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 26(6):58-68.[Yin C J.2020.Research on the impact of urbanization and industrialization on the growth of agricultural total factor productivity:Evidence based on panel data of 37 counties in Chongqing[J].Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition), 26(6):58-68.] 詹礼辉, 苏时鹏, 董艳会, 许佳贤, 黄森慰.2016.福建县域农业全要素生产率测算及其收敛分析[J].资源开发与市场, 32(1):60-63.[Zhan L H, Su S P, Dong Y H, Xu J X, Huang S W.2016.Calculation of county agricultural total factor productivity in Fujian and the convergence hypothesis[J].Resource Development & Market, 32(1):60-63.] 张子龙, 薛冰, 陈兴鹏, 李勇进.2015.中国工业环境效率及其空间差异的收敛性[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 25(2):30-38.[Zhang Z L, Xue B, Chen X P, Li Y J.2015.Convergence in spatial difference of industrial environmental efficiency in China[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(2):30-38.] Ang F, Kerstens P J.2017.Decomposing the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen total factor productivity indicator:An application to U.S.agriculture[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 260(1):359-375. Kerstens K Briec W.2004.A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator:Its relation to the Hicks-Moorsteen productivity index and the Luenberger productivity indicator[J].Economic Theory, 23(4):925-939. Kerstens K, Shen Z Y, van de Woestyne I.2018.Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-HicksMoorsteen productivity indicators:How well is total factor productivity approximated[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 195:311-318. O'Donnell C J.2012.An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38:255-272. Shen Z Y, Baležentis T, Ferrier G D.2019.Agricultural productivity evolution in China:A generalized decomposition of the Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator[J].China Economic Review, 57:101315. Walden J, Tomberlein D.2010.Estimating fishing vessel capacity:A comparison of nonparametric frontier approaches[J].Marine Resource Economics, 25(1):23-36.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 25
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0