• ISSN 1008-505X
  • CN 11-3996/S
曾科, 朱文彬, 田玉华, 尹斌. 尿素施肥方式对水稻增产增效和土壤氮素损失的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(3): 427-436. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2022336
引用本文: 曾科, 朱文彬, 田玉华, 尹斌. 尿素施肥方式对水稻增产增效和土壤氮素损失的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(3): 427-436. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2022336
ZENG Ke, ZHU Wen-bin, TIAN Yu-hua, YIN Bin. Influence of urea fertilization methods on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen loss[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(3): 427-436. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2022336
Citation: ZENG Ke, ZHU Wen-bin, TIAN Yu-hua, YIN Bin. Influence of urea fertilization methods on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen loss[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(3): 427-436. DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2022336

尿素施肥方式对水稻增产增效和土壤氮素损失的影响

Influence of urea fertilization methods on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrogen loss

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨尿素施用量、基施比例和方法对水稻产量、吸氮量和氮肥利用率的影响,以及肥料氮的去向,为制定科学合理的施氮措施提供理论依据。
    方法 水稻季田间试验于2019年和2020年在江苏太湖地区开展。供试脲酶抑制剂为N-丁基硫代磷酰三胺(NBPT),硝化抑制剂为对羟基苯丙酸甲酯(MHPP),二者用量均为施氮量的1%。试验共设6个处理:1)不施氮肥对照 (CK);2)表施尿素N 300 kg/hm2 (当地常规施肥,CN);3)表施尿素N 225 kg/hm2 (RNB);4)尿素N 225 kg/hm2,50%表施,50%深施 (RND);5)表施尿素N 225 kg/hm2+NBPT+MHPP (RNB+DI);6)尿素N 225 kg/hm2+NBPT+MHPP,50%表施,50%深施 (RND+DI)。表施氮肥处理基肥∶分蘖肥∶孕穗肥为4∶3∶3;深施氮肥处理基肥∶孕穗肥为7∶3。2020年在处理小区内设置了 15N示踪微区试验。调查了水稻产量、吸氮量、氮肥利用率以及15N肥料植株利用、土壤残留和总损失量。
    结果 与CN相比,除RNB处理2020年的秸秆生物量外,其余三个处理的籽粒与秸秆生物量均无显著差异;两年4个处理的氮肥表观利用率、农学利用率和偏生产力利用率均显著提高;15N示踪试验结果表明,4个处理均显著减少了15N吸收量,RND、RNB+DI和RND+DI还显著降低了氮肥总损失量。与RNB相比,RND处理的水稻产量增加3.3%—4.0%,氮肥表观利用率显著增加20.4%—27.3%,15N吸收量和利用率显著增加28.2%,总损失率显著降低34.6%;RNB+DI处理的水稻产量和氮肥表观利用率没有显著增加,15N吸收量和利用率显著增加11.6%,总损失率显著降低13.1%;RND+DI处理的水稻产量增加2.6%—4.3%,氮肥表观利用率显著增加23.4%,15N吸收量和利用率显著增加36.9%,损失率显著降低45.0%。与RND相比,RND+DI处理的水稻产量、氮肥利用率和15N植株吸收量均无显著差异,但降低了总损失率。
    结论 在太湖地区水稻生产中,将氮肥用量由N 300 kg/hm2减至225 kg/hm2,基施比例由40%提高到70%,同时将基肥中的50%深施,不会降低水稻产量,还显著提高了氮肥利用率,降低了氮肥总损失率,将此技术与添加氮肥抑制剂技术集成,可进一步降低氮素的损失率。从生产成本和应用效果考虑,减少氮肥总量的前提下,加大氮肥基施比例并配合基肥深施加少量撒施,是提高水稻产量和效益的适宜措施。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives We studied the effects of urea fertilization methods on rice yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and the fate of nitrogen fertilizer in soil to propose economically and environmentally friendly N management measures.
    Methods A paddy field experiment was conducted in the Taihu Lake region in 2019 and 2020, and a 15N-urea micro-plot experiment was installed in the same field plot in 2020. Urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) and nitrification inhibitor methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate (MHPP) were added at 1% of urea-N. We included six fertilizer treatments: no N application (CK); broadcasted urea N at 300 kg/hm2 (conventional fertilization, CN); broadcasted urea N at 225 kg/hm2 (RNB); 50% in deep and 50% in broadcasting of urea N at 225 kg/hm2 (RND); broadcasted urea N at 225 kg/hm2+NBPT+MHPP (RNB+DI); 50% in deep and 50% in broadcasting of urea N at 225 kg/hm2+NBPT+MHPP (RND+DI). Broadcasted urea N was applied in three splits (4 : 3 : 3) as basal, at tillering and panicle initiation stages. Deep-placed nitrogen was applied in two splits (7 : 3) as basal, and at panicle initiation stage. Rice yield, N uptake, N utilization, absorptive capacity, soil residual and total 15N loss were quantified.
    Results Compared with CN, RNB, RND, RNB+DI and RND+DI treatments recorded similar grain yield and straw biomass, except the lower straw biomass in RNB in 2020; However, all the four treatments achieved higher N use efficiency, agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity of nitrogen fertilizer, and 15N tracing result also proved the significant reduction in 15N uptake and total N loss under the four treatments. Compared with RNB, RND enhanced apparent N recovery efficiency (NRE) and 15N use efficiency by 20.4%–27.3% and 28.2%, and reduced 15N loss by 34.6% (P<0.05). RNB+DI had no impact on NRE, but (P<0.05) increased 15N use efficiency by 11.6% and reduced 15N loss rate by 13.1%. RND+DI increased rice yield by 2.6%–4.3%, NRE by 23.4%, 15N use efficiency by 36.9%, and reduced 15N loss by 45.0%. Compared with RND, RNB+DI had no impact on rice yield and NRE but reduced the 15N loss rate.
    Conclusions In the rice production of Taihu lake area, the measurement of reducing urea-N rate from 300 kg/hm2 to 225 kg/hm2, but increasing the basal fertilizer ratio from 40% to 70%, and changing total broadcasting to 50% by deep placement, will not decrease rice yield, but significantly increase nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency, decrease total N loss. Adding NBPT and MHPP in urea will further decrease the total N loss. We recommend that a higher proportion of urea should be allocated to the deep basal placement and a lower proportion to broadcasting, rather than adding N inhibitors, to increase rice yield and N use efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回